In this article we'll be finding out what the best cheap tyre on the market is!

Times are hard, and now more so than ever people are asking me what the best budget tyre they can buy is. As these have never been tested against each other properly, I usually don't have an answer, but all that is about to change!

Sadly I've not been able to test every budget available, there are literally hundreds of tyre brands coming out of the far east, most of them from just a handful of factories. In fact, I've got over 300 tyre brands on the tyre reviews website, and as much as I love big tests, even that's too much for me.

Instead, I've bought eight of the most common and cheapest tyres available I could find, and because I've never tested a retread tyre, I bought one of those too. Naturally they'll all be going through a full tyre reviews tyre test to see which is best.

Obviously, there's no point in seeing what's best if we have no reference point to know how best that is, so to see if any of them can match a premium tyre, I've have a benchmark tyre in the test. It's not going to be easy as it's the brand new, and already multiple test winning, Continental PremiumContact 7.

Can any of these eight cheap tyres get anywhere near one of the best tyres on the market in this segment?! Let's find out.

Test Publication:

https://www.tyrereviews.com

Test Size: 205/55 R16

Tyres Tested: 9 tyres

Test Categories:
4 categories (13 tests)

View Test Summary

Similar Tests

---

Test Category	Best Performer	Worst Performer	Difference
Dry (3 tests)
Dry Braking	▲ Continental PremiumContact 7: 35.27 M	▼ Triangle SporteX TH201: 40.01 M	4.7 M (11.8%)
Dry Handling	▲ Continental PremiumContact 7: 51.73 s	▼ Double-Coin DC99: 53.39 s	1.7 s (3.1%)
Subj. Dry Handling	▲ Continental PremiumContact 7: 100 Points	▼ Double-Coin DC99: 30 Points	70.0 Points (233.3%)
Wet (6 tests)
Wet Braking	▲ Continental PremiumContact 7: 31.58 M	▼ Double-Coin DC99: 46.04 M	14.5 M (31.4%)
Wet Handling	▲ Continental PremiumContact 7: 84.85 s	▼ Double-Coin DC99: 96.27 s	11.4 s (11.9%)
Subj. Wet Handling	▲ Continental PremiumContact 7: 100 Points	▼ Double-Coin DC99: 50 Points	50.0 Points (100.0%)
Wet Circle	▲ Continental PremiumContact 7: 11.5 s	▼ Double-Coin DC99: 12.8 s	1.3 s (10.2%)
Straight Aqua	▲ Continental PremiumContact 7: 74.91 Km/H	▼ Double-Coin DC99: 64.55 Km/H	10.4 Km/H (16.0%)
Curved Aquaplaning	▲ Continental PremiumContact 7: 3.3 m/sec2	▼ Double-Coin DC99: 2.3 m/sec2	1.0 m/sec2 (43.5%)
Comfort (2 tests)
Subj. Comfort	▲ Winrun R330: 100 Points	▼ Double-Coin DC99: 90 Points	10.0 Points (11.1%)
Noise	▲ Double-Coin DC99: 70.2 dB	▼ Maxtrek MAXIMUS M1: 74.4 dB	4.2 dB (5.6%)
Value (2 tests)
Price	▲ Double-Coin DC99: 45.87	▼ Continental PremiumContact 7: 86.19	40.3 (46.8%)
Rolling Resistance	▲ Tomket Sport Series 1: 8.28 kg / t	▼ Maxtrek MAXIMUS M1: 9.82 kg / t	1.5 kg / t (15.7%)

Wet

Naturally the premium tyre had a huge advantage in wet braking, stopping the Golf over 7 meters shorter from the 80 km/h than the best budget tyre, and over 14 meters shorter than the worst!

Like in wet braking, the Continental was in a in a league of its own during the wet handling test, it's a brand new premium tyre and one of the best in its class in the wet, so that's no surprise. 

The next best tyre was the Tomket, 4.4 seconds behind the Continental, but the worst budget tyre, which was the Doublecoin, was another 7.1 seconds behind the tomket! The spread inside the cheap end of the market can be as big as it is between premium and budget tyres!

While the Tomket couldn't match the poise and balance of the Continental, it was pretty easy to drive, with nice steering, a good balance and predictable levels of grip. Predictability in tyre in the wet is underrated as people tend to focus on lap times, but having a well balanced tyre is a very important quality.

This was highlighted by the Nankang, which was almost as fast over the lap but wanted to oversteer you off the track at every opportunity. I've said it before about Nankang products, the grip levels aren't bad, and they certainly make for some entertaining tyres as track day tyres, but they need to work on the balance they give the vehicle. 

Davanti, Winrun, Triangle and Maxtrex were the next group, all struggling to really communicate what was happening to the driver, they'd push into understeer quite quickly then you'd spend a lot of time off power waiting for the tyre to come back to you. 

The retreaded King Meiler was next. This was my first experience with a retreaded tyre so I had no idea what to expect, and in the wet at least, it didn't feel any different to any of the other tyres at this end of the market.

And finally, the Doublecoin. Not only was it the slowest, but it was also the hardest to drive. I couldn't quite work out when or why or what caused the sudden oversteer, but there it was. It was the worst tyre in wet braking, wet handling, and straight and curved aquaplaning.

Dry

Dry conditions usually means much closer results than in the wet, and while dry braking was closer, there was still a significant gap between the Continental and the best budget tyre, which was once again the Tomket. The difference, around 7% or nearly a car length, means when you're stopped on the Continental you're "only" doing 26kmh on the tomket, and 34 km/h on the triangle! That would be an expensive crash.

The dry handling lap times were relatively close, but it's a short track and the VW Golf test vehicle doesn't have the most power, and while the Continental was the nicest to drive, there were also some good tyres in the group. 

The Winrun was my favorite, it had good steering and stable handling making it easy to drive fast, helped by a little understeer. The Tomket was also nice during lane changes and the lap, the Nankang felt sporty for a 16" tyre with quick turn in, but once again the rear wasn't very stable meaning oversteer. Fun for a track, but perhaps not the best on the road.

As for the retreaded King Meiler, well that felt good in steering and balance, but the compound couldn't seem to keep up with the demands of the car meaning the lap time wasn't great.

The Doublecoin and Davanti were the slowest of the group, the Davanti steering felt fine sublimit and was noticeably more comfortable on the way to track than some of its competitors, but once going quickly there was little feedback and a lot of understeer, and finally the Doublecoin continued to be a really messy tyre, difficult to control and subjectively by far the worse of the group.

Environment

Echoing my subjective experience, the Doublecoin and Davanti were the quietest during the passby noise test, with the premium Continental finishing midpack. While external noise does have an impact on the noise in the cabin, it is not a direct correlation as tyre manufacturers can direct the sound into the vehicle to achieve a slightly better external noise test, and this reading doesn't account for pitch.

The Winrun and Tomket also had better a rolling resistance than the Continental, though it was less than 2%, and we've seen in the other test that the Continental was also 20% behind the best premium, so this isn't a huge win for the cheap tyres.

Shockingly, the Continental was the most expensive tyre on test.

Results

1st: Continental PremiumContact 7
205/55 R16 3PMSF: no	Test # Result Best Difference % Dry Braking 1st 35.27 M 100% Dry Handling 1st 51.73 s 100% Subj. Dry Handling 1st 100 Points 100% Wet Braking 1st 31.58 M 100% Wet Handling 1st 84.85 s 100% Subj. Wet Handling 1st 100 Points 100% Wet Circle 1st 11.5 s 100% Straight Aqua 1st 74.91 Km/H 100% Curved Aquaplaning 1st 3.3 m/sec2 100% Subj. Comfort 2nd 92 Points 100 Points -8 Points 92% Noise 4th 72 dB 70.2 dB +1.8 dB 97.5% Price 9th 86.19 45.87 +40.32 53.22% Rolling Resistance 3rd 8.38 kg / t 8.28 kg / t +0.1 kg / t 98.81% It should come as no surprise that the brand new, and premium Continental PremiumContact 7 had a huge lead overall. The PC7 was beaten by a couple of the cheaper tyres in noise and rolling resistance, but the huge amount of grip, especially in the wet, is worth a 1.19% drop in rolling resistance. Read Reviews    Buy from £93.43
2nd: Tomket Sport Series 1
205/55 R16 3PMSF: no	Test # Result Best Difference % Dry Braking 2nd 37.83 M 35.27 M +2.56 M 93.23% Dry Handling 3rd 52.78 s 51.73 s +1.05 s 98.01% Subj. Dry Handling 3rd 85 Points 100 Points -15 Points 85% Wet Braking 2nd 38.69 M 31.58 M +7.11 M 81.62% Wet Handling 2nd 89.21 s 84.85 s +4.36 s 95.11% Subj. Wet Handling 2nd 90 Points 100 Points -10 Points 90% Wet Circle 3rd 12 s 11.5 s +0.5 s 95.83% Straight Aqua 5th 70.52 Km/H 74.91 Km/H -4.39 Km/H 94.14% Curved Aquaplaning 5th 2.8 m/sec2 3.3 m/sec2 -0.5 m/sec2 84.85% Subj. Comfort 3rd 91 Points 100 Points -9 Points 91% Noise 6th 72.6 dB 70.2 dB +2.4 dB 96.69% Price 4th 50.49 45.87 +4.62 90.85% Rolling Resistance 1st 8.28 kg / t 100% While it's difficult to recommend any of the cheap tyres due to the wet braking performance, the Tomket Sport is certain the tyre to look at if you need to save money on tyres. It was the closest to the premium tyre in wet braking and wet handling, performed well in the dry and was a pleasant tyre to drive. It also had the lowest rolling resistance of the group. Read Reviews
3rd: Nankang Econex NA1
205/55 R16 3PMSF: no	Test # Result Best Difference % Dry Braking 3rd 38.45 M 35.27 M +3.18 M 91.73% Dry Handling 2nd 52.23 s 51.73 s +0.5 s 99.04% Subj. Dry Handling 6th 75 Points 100 Points -25 Points 75% Wet Braking 3rd 39.61 M 31.58 M +8.03 M 79.73% Wet Handling 3rd 89.36 s 84.85 s +4.51 s 94.95% Subj. Wet Handling 4th 70 Points 100 Points -30 Points 70% Wet Circle 2nd 11.9 s 11.5 s +0.4 s 96.64% Straight Aqua 2nd 74.13 Km/H 74.91 Km/H -0.78 Km/H 98.96% Curved Aquaplaning 2nd 3.2 m/sec2 3.3 m/sec2 -0.1 m/sec2 96.97% Subj. Comfort 8th 90 Points 100 Points -10 Points 90% Noise 3rd 71.9 dB 70.2 dB +1.7 dB 97.64% Price 3rd 46.69 45.87 +0.82 98.24% Rolling Resistance 7th 9.18 kg / t 8.28 kg / t +0.9 kg / t 90.2% As we've seen in other tests, the Nankang Econex NA-1 objectively performed well, for the price point it had good grip in grip tests, and had good aquaplaning resistance and low noise, however subjectively it was one of the tricker tyres to drive on the VW Golf test car, with a rapid transition between grip and oversteer. If you want a fun, cheap, track day tyre in a 16" wheel size, this is the tyre for you. Read Reviews    Buy from £69.88
4th: Winrun R330
205/55 R16 3PMSF: no	Test # Result Best Difference % Dry Braking 6th 39.41 M 35.27 M +4.14 M 89.5% Dry Handling 5th 52.85 s 51.73 s +1.12 s 97.88% Subj. Dry Handling 2nd 90 Points 100 Points -10 Points 90% Wet Braking 5th 40.91 M 31.58 M +9.33 M 77.19% Wet Handling 5th 92.25 s 84.85 s +7.4 s 91.98% Subj. Wet Handling 4th 70 Points 100 Points -30 Points 70% Wet Circle 4th 12.4 s 11.5 s +0.9 s 92.74% Straight Aqua 4th 70.83 Km/H 74.91 Km/H -4.08 Km/H 94.55% Curved Aquaplaning 4th 3 m/sec2 3.3 m/sec2 -0.3 m/sec2 90.91% Subj. Comfort 1st 100 Points 100% Noise 5th 72.2 dB 70.2 dB +2 dB 97.23% Price 2nd 46.59 45.87 +0.72 98.45% Rolling Resistance 2nd 8.37 kg / t 8.28 kg / t +0.09 kg / t 98.92% The Winrun R330 had a mid pack objective performance, but subjectively it was an easy tyre to drive with understeer balance. It was also one of the cheapest of the group and had the second lowest rolling resistance. Read Reviews
5th: Davanti DX390
205/55 R16 3PMSF: no	Test # Result Best Difference % Dry Braking 4th 39.08 M 35.27 M +3.81 M 90.25% Dry Handling 8th 53.32 s 51.73 s +1.59 s 97.02% Subj. Dry Handling 8th 70 Points 100 Points -30 Points 70% Wet Braking 4th 40.75 M 31.58 M +9.17 M 77.5% Wet Handling 4th 92.19 s 84.85 s +7.34 s 92.04% Subj. Wet Handling 7th 65 Points 100 Points -35 Points 65% Wet Circle 4th 12.4 s 11.5 s +0.9 s 92.74% Straight Aqua 3rd 70.98 Km/H 74.91 Km/H -3.93 Km/H 94.75% Curved Aquaplaning 3rd 3.1 m/sec2 3.3 m/sec2 -0.2 m/sec2 93.94% Subj. Comfort 3rd 91 Points 100 Points -9 Points 91% Noise 2nd 70.3 dB 70.2 dB +0.1 dB 99.86% Price 8th 57.78 45.87 +11.91 79.39% Rolling Resistance 4th 8.56 kg / t 8.28 kg / t +0.28 kg / t 96.73% The Davanti DX390 performed well in he aquaplaning tests and had slightly above average grip in the dry and wet, and it was also a comfortable tyre. The handling nature of the tyre was a safe understeer primary balance. It was the most expensive budget tyre though and was out performed by the cheaper Tomket, Nankang and Winrun products. Read Reviews
6th: Triangle SporteX TH201
205/55 R16 3PMSF: no	Test # Result Best Difference % Dry Braking 9th 40.01 M 35.27 M +4.74 M 88.15% Dry Handling 6th 52.97 s 51.73 s +1.24 s 97.66% Subj. Dry Handling 5th 80 Points 100 Points -20 Points 80% Wet Braking 7th 43.6 M 31.58 M +12.02 M 72.43% Wet Handling 6th 93.11 s 84.85 s +8.26 s 91.13% Subj. Wet Handling 4th 70 Points 100 Points -30 Points 70% Wet Circle 6th 12.7 s 11.5 s +1.2 s 90.55% Straight Aqua 7th 69.51 Km/H 74.91 Km/H -5.4 Km/H 92.79% Curved Aquaplaning 7th 2.7 m/sec2 3.3 m/sec2 -0.6 m/sec2 81.82% Subj. Comfort 3rd 91 Points 100 Points -9 Points 91% Noise 8th 73.2 dB 70.2 dB +3 dB 95.9% Price 7th 56.08 45.87 +10.21 81.79% Rolling Resistance 6th 8.71 kg / t 8.28 kg / t +0.43 kg / t 95.06% The Triangle SporteX TH201 was the second most expensive budget tyre, but the performance was near the back of the pack in every test meaning this is not a good choice at the cheap end of the market. Read Reviews
7th: King Meiler Sport 1 KM
205/55 R16 3PMSF: no	Test # Result Best Difference % Dry Braking 7th 39.48 M 35.27 M +4.21 M 89.34% Dry Handling 4th 52.84 s 51.73 s +1.11 s 97.9% Subj. Dry Handling 3rd 85 Points 100 Points -15 Points 85% Wet Braking 8th 43.93 M 31.58 M +12.35 M 71.89% Wet Handling 8th 95.24 s 84.85 s +10.39 s 89.09% Subj. Wet Handling 7th 65 Points 100 Points -35 Points 65% Wet Circle 6th 12.7 s 11.5 s +1.2 s 90.55% Straight Aqua 6th 69.61 Km/H 74.91 Km/H -5.3 Km/H 92.92% Curved Aquaplaning 5th 2.8 m/sec2 3.3 m/sec2 -0.5 m/sec2 84.85% Subj. Comfort 3rd 91 Points 100 Points -9 Points 91% Noise 7th 72.9 dB 70.2 dB +2.7 dB 96.3% Price 5th 54.3 45.87 +8.43 84.48% Rolling Resistance 8th 9.42 kg / t 8.28 kg / t +1.14 kg / t 87.9% The King Meiler Sport 1 KM retreaded tyre promises German engineering performance at Chinese tyres pricing, and while the subjective qualities of the tyre were fine, objectively it was near the back of each test. Read Reviews
8th: Maxtrek MAXIMUS M1
205/55 R16 3PMSF: no	Test # Result Best Difference % Dry Braking 5th 39.32 M 35.27 M +4.05 M 89.7% Dry Handling 7th 53.21 s 51.73 s +1.48 s 97.22% Subj. Dry Handling 6th 75 Points 100 Points -25 Points 75% Wet Braking 6th 43.45 M 31.58 M +11.87 M 72.68% Wet Handling 7th 93.93 s 84.85 s +9.08 s 90.33% Subj. Wet Handling 3rd 75 Points 100 Points -25 Points 75% Wet Circle 6th 12.7 s 11.5 s +1.2 s 90.55% Straight Aqua 8th 67.3 Km/H 74.91 Km/H -7.61 Km/H 89.84% Curved Aquaplaning 8th 2.6 m/sec2 3.3 m/sec2 -0.7 m/sec2 78.79% Subj. Comfort 3rd 91 Points 100 Points -9 Points 91% Noise 9th 74.4 dB 70.2 dB +4.2 dB 94.35% Price 6th 55.18 45.87 +9.31 83.13% Rolling Resistance 9th 9.82 kg / t 8.28 kg / t +1.54 kg / t 84.32% The Maxtrek Maximus M1 finish the test in a similar situation to the Triangle, as one of the most expensive budget tyres on test, but without the performance to match. Read Reviews
9th: Double Coin DC99
205/55 R16 3PMSF: no	Test # Result Best Difference % Dry Braking 8th 39.62 M 35.27 M +4.35 M 89.02% Dry Handling 9th 53.39 s 51.73 s +1.66 s 96.89% Subj. Dry Handling 9th 30 Points 100 Points -70 Points 30% Wet Braking 9th 46.04 M 31.58 M +14.46 M 68.59% Wet Handling 9th 96.27 s 84.85 s +11.42 s 88.14% Subj. Wet Handling 9th 50 Points 100 Points -50 Points 50% Wet Circle 9th 12.8 s 11.5 s +1.3 s 89.84% Straight Aqua 9th 64.55 Km/H 74.91 Km/H -10.36 Km/H 86.17% Curved Aquaplaning 9th 2.3 m/sec2 3.3 m/sec2 -1 m/sec2 69.7% Subj. Comfort 8th 90 Points 100 Points -10 Points 90% Noise 1st 70.2 dB 100% Price 1st 45.87 100% Rolling Resistance 5th 8.63 kg / t 8.28 kg / t +0.35 kg / t 95.94% The DoubleCoin DC99 was the cheapest tyre on test, and had the lowest noise and mid-pack rolling resistance, but every other test it was last, with the worst wet grip by far. Definitely a tyre to avoid, even if it is the cheapest tyre of the test. Read Reviews