2024 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test

Below is all the glorious data from the Auto Bild full winter test, in 205/55 R16. These are the top 20 tyres that made it through the 53 tyre shootout, so they're all essentially good tyres, they're just different shades of good.

In a welcome change, Auto Bild actually published what the reference summer and all season tyres were. They were the Continental PremiumContact 7 summer tyre, and the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 all season tyre. Naturally the summer tyre aced dry and wet, and was useless in snow, however the performance of the Goodyear all season tyre really further throws into question the line between European winter tyres and a well rounded all season tyre.

Dry BrakingKumho Winter Craft WP52: 43 MFulda Kristall Control HP2: 46.4 M
Dry HandlingContinental WinterContact TS 870: 110.6 Km/HFirestone Winterhawk 4: 108.2 Km/H
Wet BrakingKumho Winter Craft WP52: 54 MFulda Kristall Control HP2: 60.3 M
Wet HandlingBridgestone Blizzak 6: 76.01 Km/HFulda Kristall Control HP2: 71.49 Km/H
Wet CircleBridgestone Blizzak 6: 12.26 sFulda Kristall Control HP2: 12.84 s
Straight AquaHankook Winter I cept RS3: 84.5 Km/HKumho Winter Craft WP52: 73 Km/H
Curved AquaplaningHankook Winter I cept RS3: 3.93 m/sec2Kumho Winter Craft WP52: 1.98 m/sec2
Snow BrakingHankook Winter I cept RS3: 29.1 MFirestone Winterhawk 4: 30.9 M
Snow TractionDunlop Winter Sport 5: 2570 NYokohama BluEarth Winter V906 plus: 2271 N
Snow HandlingGiti GitiWinterW2: 60.9 Km/HYokohama BluEarth Winter V906 plus: 57.5 Km/H
Snow SlalomHankook Winter I cept RS3: 3.31 m/sec2Firestone Winterhawk 4: 3.12 m/sec2
NoiseGiti GitiWinterW2: 70.3 dBFulda Kristall Control HP2: 72.9 dB
WearMichelin Alpin 6: 50500 KMKumho Winter Craft WP52: 37350 KM
ValueSemperit Speed Grip 5: 6.64 Price/1000Bridgestone Blizzak 6: 11.29 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceBarum Polaris 5: 7.28 kg / tGiti GitiWinterW2: 10.15 kg / t

Dry

In the dry braking test, the Kumho Winter Craft WP52 performed best among winter tyres, stopping in 43.0 meters. The worst-performing winter tyre was the Fulda Kristall Control HP2, which took 46.4 meters to stop - a difference of 3.4 meters. Interestingly, the reference summer tyre outperformed all winter tyres with a stopping distance of 38.6 meters, while the reference all-season tyre was comparable to the best winter tyres at 43.1 meters. The reference budget winter tyre performed significantly worse, needing 47.9 meters to stop.

The Continental WinterContact TS 870 achieved the highest average speed of 110.6 km/h in the dry handling test, while the Firestone Winterhawk 4 was the slowest at 108.2 km/h - a difference of 2.4 km/h. The reference summer tyre again outperformed all winter tyres with an average speed of 115.0 km/h. The reference all-season tyre performed well, matching some of the better winter tyres at 112.6 km/h. The reference budget winter tyre was significantly slower at 106.3 km/h, showing the performance gap in dry conditions.

These results demonstrate that while winter tyres have improved in dry performance, they still lag behind summer tyres in these conditions. The Kumho Winter Craft WP52 and Continental WinterContact TS 870 showed consistent performance across both dry tests, while the Fulda Kristall Control HP2 and Firestone Winterhawk 4 struggled in dry conditions.

Wet

The Bridgestone Blizzak 6 and Kumho Winter Craft WP52 tied for the best wet braking performance among winter tyres, both stopping in 54.0 meters. The worst performer was the Fulda Kristall Control HP2, needing 60.3 meters - a significant difference of 6.3 meters. The reference summer tyre outperformed all tyres with a stopping distance of 52.9 meters, while the reference all-season tyre was close to the best winter tyres at 54.7 meters. The reference budget winter tyre performed extremely poorly, requiring 79.1 meters to stop - highlighting the importance of quality in wet conditions.

The Bridgestone Blizzak 6 achieved the highest average speed of 76.01 km/h in wet handling, while the Fulda Kristall Control HP2 was again the slowest at 71.49 km/h - a difference of 4.52 km/h. The reference summer tyre once more outperformed all others with a speed of 77.36 km/h. The reference all-season tyre performed well at 74.52 km/h, while the reference budget winter tyre was significantly slower at 62.36 km/h.

The Hankook Winter I cept RS3 performed best in straight aquaplaning resistance, maintaining control up to 84.5 km/h. The Kumho Winter Craft WP52 performed worst, losing control at 73.0 km/h - a substantial difference of 11.5 km/h. Interestingly, the reference summer tyre (80.4 km/h) and all-season tyre (79.8 km/h) were outperformed by many winter tyres in this test. The reference budget winter tyre performed poorly, losing control at just 66.1 km/h.

The Hankook Winter I cept RS3 also excelled in curved aquaplaning, maintaining 3.93 m/s² of lateral acceleration. The Kumho Winter Craft WP52 struggled most, managing only 1.98 m/s² - a significant difference of 1.95 m/s². The reference summer tyre (3.19 m/s²) and all-season tyre (2.95 m/s²) were outperformed by many winter tyres. The reference budget winter tyre performed very poorly at 1.23 m/s².

These wet tests highlight the superior performance of quality winter tyres in challenging conditions. The Bridgestone Blizzak 6 showed consistent excellence across wet tests, while the Fulda Kristall Control HP2 and Kumho Winter Craft WP52 struggled in multiple wet scenarios. The results also demonstrate that while summer tyres excel in some wet conditions, winter tyres can outperform them in specific scenarios like aquaplaning resistance.

Snow

In snow braking, the Hankook Winter I cept RS3, Semperit Speed Grip 5, and Continental WinterContact TS 870 tied for best performance, stopping in 29.1 meters. The worst performer was the Firestone Winterhawk 4, needing 30.9 meters - a difference of 1.8 meters. As expected, the reference summer tyre performed extremely poorly, requiring 46.1 meters to stop. The reference all-season tyre performed well at 29.7 meters, while the reference budget winter tyre needed 35.8 meters, showing the importance of quality in winter tyres.

The Dunlop Winter Sport 5 provided the best snow traction with 2570 N of pulling force. The Yokohama BluEarth Winter V906+ performed worst with 2271 N - a significant difference of 299 N. The reference summer tyre struggled immensely with only 849 N of pulling force. The reference all-season tyre performed surprisingly well with 2516 N, while the reference budget winter tyre managed 1790 N.

The Giti GitiWinterW2 achieved the highest average speed of 60.9 km/h in snow handling. The Yokohama BluEarth Winter V906+ performed worst at 57.5 km/h - a difference of 3.4 km/h. The reference summer tyre's performance was not recorded for this test. The reference all-season tyre performed well at 59.6 km/h, while the reference budget winter tyre achieved 55.9 km/h.

These snow tests clearly demonstrate the superior performance of winter tyres in snowy conditions compared to summer tyres. The Hankook Winter I cept RS3 and Continental WinterContact TS 870 showed consistent excellence across multiple snow tests. The Firestone Winterhawk 4 and Yokohama BluEarth Winter V906+struggled in various snow scenarios. The all-season tyre performed surprisingly well in snow, often matching or exceeding some winter tyres, while the budget winter tyre consistently underperformed compared to premium options.

Comfort

The Giti GitiWinterW2 was the quietest tyre, producing 70.3 dB of external noise. The Fulda Kristall Control HP2 was the loudest at 72.9 dB - a difference of 2.6 dB. Interestingly, both the reference summer tyre (73.4 dB) and the reference budget winter tyre (74.2 dB) were noisier than all the tested winter tyres. The reference all-season tyre performed well at 71.0 dB, matching some of the quieter winter tyres.

Value

The Michelin Alpin 6 showed the best predicted tread life at 50,500 km. The Kumho Winter Craft WP52 had the worst wear performance at just 37,350 km - an difference of 13,150 km. 

The Semperit Speed Grip 5 offered the best value at €6.64 per 1000 km. The Bridgestone Blizzak 6 was the most expensive at €11.29 per 1000 km - a difference of €4.65 per 1000 km. 

The Barum Polaris 5 had the lowest rolling resistance at 7.28 kg/t. The Giti GitiWinterW2 had the highest at 10.15 kg/t - a difference of 2.87 kg/t. 

These results show that there can be significant differences in comfort, longevity, and efficiency among winter tyres. The Giti GitiWinterW2 excelled in noise reduction but struggled with rolling resistance. The Firestone Winterhawk 4 showed excellent wear characteristics but performed poorly in several performance tests. The Semperit Speed Grip 5 offered the best value, balancing cost and performance effectively.

Results

1st: Continental WinterContact TS 870

Continental WinterContact TS 870
  • 205/55 R16 91H
  • EU Label: C/B/70
  • 3PMSF: yes
  • Price: 460.00
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking4th43.9 M43 M+0.9 M97.95%
Dry Handling1st110.6 Km/H100%
Wet Braking11th57.9 M54 M+3.9 M93.26%
Wet Handling2nd75.14 Km/H76.01 Km/H-0.87 Km/H98.86%
Wet Circle2nd12.29 s12.26 s+0.03 s99.76%
Straight Aqua2nd84.3 Km/H84.5 Km/H-0.2 Km/H99.76%
Curved Aquaplaning2nd3.82 m/sec23.93 m/sec2-0.11 m/sec297.2%
Snow Braking1st29.1 M100%
Snow Traction3rd2520 N2570 N-50 N98.05%
Snow Handling4th60 Km/H60.9 Km/H-0.9 Km/H98.52%
Snow Slalom6th3.28 m/sec23.31 m/sec2-0.03 m/sec299.09%
Noise5th71 dB70.3 dB+0.7 dB99.01%
Wear5th47970 KM50500 KM-2530 KM94.99%
Value16th9.59 Price/10006.64 Price/1000+2.95 Price/100069.24%
Rolling Resistance5th7.83 kg / t7.28 kg / t+0.55 kg / t92.98%
Test winner with balanced strong performance in all weather conditions, short braking distances, very high mileage.
Higher price level.
The Continental WinterContact TS 870 emerges as the test winner, showcasing exceptional performance across all weather conditions. It excels in both snowy and wet conditions, offering short braking distances and very high mileage. While it comes with a higher price tag, its balanced performance and safety features make it a top choice for drivers seeking premium winter tyres.

Read Reviews    Buy from £124.49

2nd: Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3

Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
  • 205/55 R16 91H
  • EU Label: C/B/70
  • 3PMSF: yes
  • Price: 440.00
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking4th43.9 M43 M+0.9 M97.95%
Dry Handling7th109.6 Km/H110.6 Km/H-1 Km/H99.1%
Wet Braking10th57.7 M54 M+3.7 M93.59%
Wet Handling6th74.81 Km/H76.01 Km/H-1.2 Km/H98.42%
Wet Circle5th12.41 s12.26 s+0.15 s98.79%
Straight Aqua7th82.2 Km/H84.5 Km/H-2.3 Km/H97.28%
Curved Aquaplaning5th3.61 m/sec23.93 m/sec2-0.32 m/sec291.86%
Snow Braking8th29.4 M29.1 M+0.3 M98.98%
Snow Traction5th2512 N2570 N-58 N97.74%
Snow Handling6th59.9 Km/H60.9 Km/H-1 Km/H98.36%
Snow Slalom10th3.23 m/sec23.31 m/sec2-0.08 m/sec297.58%
Noise2nd70.8 dB70.3 dB+0.5 dB99.29%
Wear6th47500 KM50500 KM-3000 KM94.06%
Value13th9.26 Price/10006.64 Price/1000+2.62 Price/100071.71%
Rolling Resistance10th8.2 kg / t7.28 kg / t+0.92 kg / t88.78%
Winter talent without fault, offers safe driving behavior in any weather, convincingly good mileage.
Higher price level.
The Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 proves to be a well-rounded winter tyre, delivering excellent performance in all weather conditions. It offers safe driving characteristics and impressive mileage. Despite its higher price, it stands out as a reliable choice for those prioritizing safety and performance in winter conditions.

Read Reviews    Buy from £109.99

3rd: Semperit Speed Grip 5

Semperit Speed Grip 5
  • 205/55 R16 91H
  • EU Label: C/B/72
  • 3PMSF: yes
  • Price: 320.00
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking3rd43.7 M43 M+0.7 M98.4%
Dry Handling5th109.8 Km/H110.6 Km/H-0.8 Km/H99.28%
Wet Braking9th57.5 M54 M+3.5 M93.91%
Wet Handling13th73.53 Km/H76.01 Km/H-2.48 Km/H96.74%
Wet Circle6th12.44 s12.26 s+0.18 s98.55%
Straight Aqua8th82 Km/H84.5 Km/H-2.5 Km/H97.04%
Curved Aquaplaning10th3.42 m/sec23.93 m/sec2-0.51 m/sec287.02%
Snow Braking1st29.1 M100%
Snow Traction13th2457 N2570 N-113 N95.6%
Snow Handling10th59.5 Km/H60.9 Km/H-1.4 Km/H97.7%
Snow Slalom8th3.25 m/sec23.31 m/sec2-0.06 m/sec298.19%
Noise10th71.6 dB70.3 dB+1.3 dB98.18%
Wear4th48210 KM50500 KM-2290 KM95.47%
Value1st6.64 Price/1000100%
Rolling Resistance6th7.91 kg / t7.28 kg / t+0.63 kg / t92.04%
Affordable second-tier brand that shows good performance in all weather, very high mileage, low rolling resistance.
Slightly limited grip in wet conditions.
The Semperit Speed-Grip 5 offers an impressive balance of performance and value. As Continental's second-tier brand, it provides good performance across all weather conditions, especially excelling in snowy conditions. With very high mileage and low rolling resistance, it's an economical choice that doesn't compromise much on safety, despite slightly reduced wet grip.

Read Reviews

4th: Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Bridgestone Blizzak 6
  • 205/55 R16 94H
  • EU Label: C/B/70
  • 3PMSF: yes
  • Price: 500.00
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking8th44.1 M43 M+1.1 M97.51%
Dry Handling2nd110.2 Km/H110.6 Km/H-0.4 Km/H99.64%
Wet Braking1st54 M100%
Wet Handling1st76.01 Km/H100%
Wet Circle1st12.26 s100%
Straight Aqua10th81 Km/H84.5 Km/H-3.5 Km/H95.86%
Curved Aquaplaning13th3.2 m/sec23.93 m/sec2-0.73 m/sec281.42%
Snow Braking11th29.6 M29.1 M+0.5 M98.31%
Snow Traction5th2512 N2570 N-58 N97.74%
Snow Handling12th59.2 Km/H60.9 Km/H-1.7 Km/H97.21%
Snow Slalom7th3.27 m/sec23.31 m/sec2-0.04 m/sec298.79%
Noise18th72.3 dB70.3 dB+2 dB97.23%
Wear9th44300 KM50500 KM-6200 KM87.72%
Value20th11.29 Price/10006.64 Price/1000+4.65 Price/100058.81%
Rolling Resistance14th8.77 kg / t7.28 kg / t+1.49 kg / t83.01%
Sporty winter talent with strong performance on every surface, short braking distances, convincing mileage.
High price level.
The Bridgestone Blizzak 6 "Enliten" demonstrates strong performance across all conditions, particularly excelling in its sporty handling. It offers short braking distances and convincing mileage, making it a reliable choice for winter driving. While it comes with a higher price, its all-round performance justifies the investment for those seeking a premium winter tyre.

Read Reviews

5th: Michelin Alpin 6

Michelin Alpin 6
  • 205/55 R16 91H
  • EU Label: C/B/69
  • 3PMSF: yes
  • Price: 520.00
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking7th44 M43 M+1 M97.73%
Dry Handling11th109.2 Km/H110.6 Km/H-1.4 Km/H98.73%
Wet Braking6th56.6 M54 M+2.6 M95.41%
Wet Handling3rd75.02 Km/H76.01 Km/H-0.99 Km/H98.7%
Wet Circle9th12.52 s12.26 s+0.26 s97.92%
Straight Aqua16th78.5 Km/H84.5 Km/H-6 Km/H92.9%
Curved Aquaplaning14th3.16 m/sec23.93 m/sec2-0.77 m/sec280.41%
Snow Braking13th29.7 M29.1 M+0.6 M97.98%
Snow Traction10th2483 N2570 N-87 N96.61%
Snow Handling16th58.7 Km/H60.9 Km/H-2.2 Km/H96.39%
Snow Slalom16th3.18 m/sec23.31 m/sec2-0.13 m/sec296.07%
Noise8th71.4 dB70.3 dB+1.1 dB98.46%
Wear1st50500 KM100%
Value18th10.3 Price/10006.64 Price/1000+3.66 Price/100064.47%
Rolling Resistance9th8.1 kg / t7.28 kg / t+0.82 kg / t89.88%
Premium tyre with balanced good performance in all weather, very high mileage, low rolling resistance, good comfort.
High price level.
The Michelin Alpin 6 showcases why it's a premium tyre with its balanced performance across all weather conditions. It stands out with very high mileage, low rolling resistance, and good comfort, making it an excellent choice for those who prioritize long-term value and driving comfort. Despite its high price, it offers strong performance in key areas, including receiving the "Green Tyre 2024/25" award for its environmental credentials.

Read Reviews

6th: Hankook Winter I cept RS3

Hankook Winter I cept RS3
  • 205/55 R16 91H
  • EU Label: C/B/72
  • 3PMSF: yes
  • Price: 360.00
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking15th45.2 M43 M+2.2 M95.13%
Dry Handling5th109.8 Km/H110.6 Km/H-0.8 Km/H99.28%
Wet Braking18th59.1 M54 M+5.1 M91.37%
Wet Handling7th74.3 Km/H76.01 Km/H-1.71 Km/H97.75%
Wet Circle14th12.66 s12.26 s+0.4 s96.84%
Straight Aqua1st84.5 Km/H100%
Curved Aquaplaning1st3.93 m/sec2100%
Snow Braking1st29.1 M100%
Snow Traction7th2509 N2570 N-61 N97.63%
Snow Handling7th59.6 Km/H60.9 Km/H-1.3 Km/H97.87%
Snow Slalom1st3.31 m/sec2100%
Noise10th71.6 dB70.3 dB+1.3 dB98.18%
Wear2nd50250 KM50500 KM-250 KM99.5%
Value2nd7.16 Price/10006.64 Price/1000+0.52 Price/100092.74%
Rolling Resistance3rd7.72 kg / t7.28 kg / t+0.44 kg / t94.3%
Sporty direct performance in any weather, good reserves in aquaplaning, outstanding mileage, fair price.
Extended wet braking distance.
The Hankook Winter i*cept RS3 offers a compelling mix of performance and value. It provides sporty, direct handling in all weather conditions and particularly excels in aquaplaning resistance. With outstanding mileage and a fair price, it's an attractive option for budget-conscious drivers. However, its slightly extended wet braking distance is a point to consider. Notably, it won the "Eco-Master" award, indicating excellent environmental and economic performance.

Read Reviews

7th: Dunlop Winter Sport 5

Dunlop Winter Sport 5
  • 205/55 R16 91H
  • EU Label: C/B/71
  • 3PMSF: yes
  • Price: 380.00
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking18th46 M43 M+3 M93.48%
Dry Handling16th108.9 Km/H110.6 Km/H-1.7 Km/H98.46%
Wet Braking14th58.5 M54 M+4.5 M92.31%
Wet Handling9th74.13 Km/H76.01 Km/H-1.88 Km/H97.53%
Wet Circle8th12.48 s12.26 s+0.22 s98.24%
Straight Aqua17th77.5 Km/H84.5 Km/H-7 Km/H91.72%
Curved Aquaplaning3rd3.71 m/sec23.93 m/sec2-0.22 m/sec294.4%
Snow Braking4th29.2 M29.1 M+0.1 M99.66%
Snow Traction1st2570 N100%
Snow Handling7th59.6 Km/H60.9 Km/H-1.3 Km/H97.87%
Snow Slalom1st3.31 m/sec2100%
Noise19th72.5 dB70.3 dB+2.2 dB96.97%
Wear3rd48690 KM50500 KM-1810 KM96.42%
Value5th7.8 Price/10006.64 Price/1000+1.16 Price/100085.13%
Rolling Resistance4th7.82 kg / t7.28 kg / t+0.54 kg / t93.09%
Convincingly strong performance on snow, outstanding mileage, low rolling resistance.
Slightly limited grip on wet roads.
The Dunlop Winter Sport 5 shines in winter conditions, offering excellent performance on snow. It boasts outstanding mileage and low rolling resistance, making it an economical choice for winter driving. While it performs well overall, its slightly limited grip on wet roads is a minor drawback to consider.

Read Reviews    Buy from £89.40

8th: Kleber Krisalp HP3

Kleber Krisalp HP3
  • 205/55 R16 91H
  • EU Label: D/B/69
  • 3PMSF: yes
  • Price: 360.00
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking12th44.7 M43 M+1.7 M96.2%
Dry Handling14th109 Km/H110.6 Km/H-1.6 Km/H98.55%
Wet Braking18th59.1 M54 M+5.1 M91.37%
Wet Handling14th73.49 Km/H76.01 Km/H-2.52 Km/H96.68%
Wet Circle19th12.74 s12.26 s+0.48 s96.23%
Straight Aqua4th83.4 Km/H84.5 Km/H-1.1 Km/H98.7%
Curved Aquaplaning6th3.58 m/sec23.93 m/sec2-0.35 m/sec291.09%
Snow Braking6th29.3 M29.1 M+0.2 M99.32%
Snow Traction18th2429 N2570 N-141 N94.51%
Snow Handling14th59 Km/H60.9 Km/H-1.9 Km/H96.88%
Snow Slalom10th3.23 m/sec23.31 m/sec2-0.08 m/sec297.58%
Noise17th72.2 dB70.3 dB+1.9 dB97.37%
Wear11th41730 KM50500 KM-8770 KM82.63%
Value11th8.63 Price/10006.64 Price/1000+1.99 Price/100076.94%
Rolling Resistance13th8.61 kg / t7.28 kg / t+1.33 kg / t84.55%
Convincingly good performance on snowy roads, very good reserves in aquaplaning, low rolling resistance.
Slightly extended wet braking distance.
The Kleber Krisalp HP3 proves to be a solid winter tyre, particularly excelling on snowy roads. It offers very good protection against aquaplaning and has low rolling resistance, contributing to fuel efficiency. However, its slightly longer braking distance on wet roads is a point of concern. Overall, it provides good value for its performance.

Read Reviews

9th: Uniroyal WinterExpert

Uniroyal WinterExpert
  • 205/55 R16 91H
  • EU Label: C/B/71
  • 3PMSF: yes
  • Price: 340.00
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking8th44.1 M43 M+1.1 M97.51%
Dry Handling11th109.2 Km/H110.6 Km/H-1.4 Km/H98.73%
Wet Braking8th57.1 M54 M+3.1 M94.57%
Wet Handling10th74.12 Km/H76.01 Km/H-1.89 Km/H97.51%
Wet Circle3rd12.38 s12.26 s+0.12 s99.03%
Straight Aqua10th81 Km/H84.5 Km/H-3.5 Km/H95.86%
Curved Aquaplaning11th3.4 m/sec23.93 m/sec2-0.53 m/sec286.51%
Snow Braking10th29.5 M29.1 M+0.4 M98.64%
Snow Traction15th2450 N2570 N-120 N95.33%
Snow Handling19th58 Km/H60.9 Km/H-2.9 Km/H95.24%
Snow Slalom17th3.15 m/sec23.31 m/sec2-0.16 m/sec295.17%
Noise14th71.8 dB70.3 dB+1.5 dB97.91%
Wear7th45540 KM50500 KM-4960 KM90.18%
Value4th7.47 Price/10006.64 Price/1000+0.83 Price/100088.89%
Rolling Resistance2nd7.64 kg / t7.28 kg / t+0.36 kg / t95.29%
Balanced safe driving behavior in wet conditions, good mileage, low rolling resistance.
Moderate lateral guidance on snow.
The Uniroyal WinterExpert offers a balanced performance, with particular strength in wet conditions. It provides good mileage and low rolling resistance, making it an economical choice. However, its moderate lateral guidance on snow suggests that while it's competent in winter conditions, it may not be the top performer in severe winter weather.

Read Reviews

9th: BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2

BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2
  • 205/55 R16 91H
  • EU Label: D/B/69
  • 3PMSF: yes
  • Price: 380.00
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking13th45 M43 M+2 M95.56%
Dry Handling14th109 Km/H110.6 Km/H-1.6 Km/H98.55%
Wet Braking16th58.6 M54 M+4.6 M92.15%
Wet Handling14th73.49 Km/H76.01 Km/H-2.52 Km/H96.68%
Wet Circle15th12.67 s12.26 s+0.41 s96.76%
Straight Aqua4th83.4 Km/H84.5 Km/H-1.1 Km/H98.7%
Curved Aquaplaning9th3.46 m/sec23.93 m/sec2-0.47 m/sec288.04%
Snow Braking8th29.4 M29.1 M+0.3 M98.98%
Snow Traction4th2513 N2570 N-57 N97.78%
Snow Handling13th59.1 Km/H60.9 Km/H-1.8 Km/H97.04%
Snow Slalom4th3.3 m/sec23.31 m/sec2-0.01 m/sec299.7%
Noise12th71.7 dB70.3 dB+1.4 dB98.05%
Wear12th41330 KM50500 KM-9170 KM81.84%
Value12th9.19 Price/10006.64 Price/1000+2.55 Price/100072.25%
Rolling Resistance12th8.48 kg / t7.28 kg / t+1.2 kg / t85.85%
Top performance on snow and, good safety reserves in aquaplaning, quiet rolling noise.
Slightly extended wet braking distance.
The BF Goodrich g-Force Winter 2 excels in winter conditions, offering top performance on snow. It also provides good protection against aquaplaning and offers a quiet ride. Its main drawback is a slightly longer braking distance in wet conditions. This tyre seems well-suited for areas with harsh winters but may be less ideal for regions with frequent wet conditions.

Read Reviews

11th: Vredestein Wintrac

Vredestein Wintrac
  • 205/55 R16 91H
  • EU Label: C/B/70
  • 3PMSF: yes
  • Price: 380.00
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking2nd43.5 M43 M+0.5 M98.85%
Dry Handling8th109.4 Km/H110.6 Km/H-1.2 Km/H98.92%
Wet Braking13th58.3 M54 M+4.3 M92.62%
Wet Handling11th74.08 Km/H76.01 Km/H-1.93 Km/H97.46%
Wet Circle13th12.63 s12.26 s+0.37 s97.07%
Straight Aqua13th80.7 Km/H84.5 Km/H-3.8 Km/H95.5%
Curved Aquaplaning16th3.12 m/sec23.93 m/sec2-0.81 m/sec279.39%
Snow Braking15th30.2 M29.1 M+1.1 M96.36%
Snow Traction16th2449 N2570 N-121 N95.29%
Snow Handling18th58.5 Km/H60.9 Km/H-2.4 Km/H96.06%
Snow Slalom13th3.22 m/sec23.31 m/sec2-0.09 m/sec297.28%
Noise6th71.2 dB70.3 dB+0.9 dB98.74%
Wear13th40400 KM50500 KM-10100 KM80%
Value15th9.41 Price/10006.64 Price/1000+2.77 Price/100070.56%
Rolling Resistance7th8.01 kg / t7.28 kg / t+0.73 kg / t90.89%
Balanced good dynamics in all weather conditions, good reserves in aquaplaning, low rolling resistance.
Slightly extended wet braking distance.
The Vredestein Wintrac offers a well-rounded performance across all weather conditions. It provides good protection against aquaplaning and has low rolling resistance, contributing to fuel efficiency. While it performs well in most areas, its slightly longer braking distance on wet roads is a point to consider. Overall, it's a solid all-rounder for winter conditions.

Read Reviews

12th: Apollo Alnac 4G Winter

Apollo Alnac 4G Winter
  • 205/55 R16 91H
  • EU Label: C/C/71
  • 3PMSF: yes
  • Price: 320.00
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking10th44.4 M43 M+1.4 M96.85%
Dry Handling13th109.1 Km/H110.6 Km/H-1.5 Km/H98.64%
Wet Braking7th56.9 M54 M+2.9 M94.9%
Wet Handling8th74.23 Km/H76.01 Km/H-1.78 Km/H97.66%
Wet Circle10th12.56 s12.26 s+0.3 s97.61%
Straight Aqua15th78.8 Km/H84.5 Km/H-5.7 Km/H93.25%
Curved Aquaplaning17th2.93 m/sec23.93 m/sec2-1 m/sec274.55%
Snow Braking18th30.6 M29.1 M+1.5 M95.1%
Snow Traction14th2452 N2570 N-118 N95.41%
Snow Handling17th58.6 Km/H60.9 Km/H-2.3 Km/H96.22%
Snow Slalom17th3.15 m/sec23.31 m/sec2-0.16 m/sec295.17%
Noise4th70.9 dB70.3 dB+0.6 dB99.15%
Wear14th39840 KM50500 KM-10660 KM78.89%
Value6th8.03 Price/10006.64 Price/1000+1.39 Price/100082.69%
Rolling Resistance11th8.44 kg / t7.28 kg / t+1.16 kg / t86.26%
Balanced safe driving behavior in all weather, short braking distances, low noise level.
Moderate lateral guidance on snow.
The Apollo Alnac 4G Winter provides balanced performance across various weather conditions. It offers short braking distances and operates quietly, enhancing driving comfort. However, its moderate lateral guidance on snow suggests that while it's competent in winter conditions, it may not be the top performer in severe winter weather. It represents a good value option for those in areas with milder winters.

Read Reviews    Buy from £69.99

13th: Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2

Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2
  • 205/55 R16 94H
  • EU Label: C/B/69
  • 3PMSF: yes
  • Price: 420.00
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking11th44.5 M43 M+1.5 M96.63%
Dry Handling17th108.8 Km/H110.6 Km/H-1.8 Km/H98.37%
Wet Braking4th55.6 M54 M+1.6 M97.12%
Wet Handling5th74.89 Km/H76.01 Km/H-1.12 Km/H98.53%
Wet Circle6th12.44 s12.26 s+0.18 s98.55%
Straight Aqua12th80.9 Km/H84.5 Km/H-3.6 Km/H95.74%
Curved Aquaplaning14th3.16 m/sec23.93 m/sec2-0.77 m/sec280.41%
Snow Braking15th30.2 M29.1 M+1.1 M96.36%
Snow Traction8th2491 N2570 N-79 N96.93%
Snow Handling4th60 Km/H60.9 Km/H-0.9 Km/H98.52%
Snow Slalom8th3.25 m/sec23.31 m/sec2-0.06 m/sec298.19%
Noise8th71.4 dB70.3 dB+1.1 dB98.46%
Wear16th38700 KM50500 KM-11800 KM76.63%
Value19th10.85 Price/10006.64 Price/1000+4.21 Price/100061.2%
Rolling Resistance16th8.83 kg / t7.28 kg / t+1.55 kg / t82.45%
Convincing good driving characteristics with short braking distances on snow and wet roads, quiet passing noise.
Moderate mileage.
The Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2 demonstrates good performance in winter conditions, particularly excelling in braking on snow and wet roads. It also offers a quiet ride, enhancing driving comfort. However, its moderate mileage might be a concern for those looking for long-term value. This tyre seems well-suited for drivers who prioritize performance and comfort in winter conditions but may not be the best choice for high-mileage drivers.

Read Reviews    Buy from £105.99

14th: Giti GitiWinterW2

Giti GitiWinterW2
  • 205/55 R16 91H
  • EU Label: D/B/68
  • 3PMSF: yes
  • Price: 420.00
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking14th45.1 M43 M+2.1 M95.34%
Dry Handling17th108.8 Km/H110.6 Km/H-1.8 Km/H98.37%
Wet Braking14th58.5 M54 M+4.5 M92.31%
Wet Handling18th72.94 Km/H76.01 Km/H-3.07 Km/H95.96%
Wet Circle10th12.56 s12.26 s+0.3 s97.61%
Straight Aqua6th82.5 Km/H84.5 Km/H-2 Km/H97.63%
Curved Aquaplaning4th3.64 m/sec23.93 m/sec2-0.29 m/sec292.62%
Snow Braking4th29.2 M29.1 M+0.1 M99.66%
Snow Traction12th2477 N2570 N-93 N96.38%
Snow Handling1st60.9 Km/H100%
Snow Slalom1st3.31 m/sec2100%
Noise1st70.3 dB100%
Wear8th44810 KM50500 KM-5690 KM88.73%
Value14th9.37 Price/10006.64 Price/1000+2.73 Price/100070.86%
Rolling Resistance20th10.15 kg / t7.28 kg / t+2.87 kg / t71.72%
Convincing qualities on snowy roads, good reserves in aquaplaning, good mileage.
Extended wet braking distance, delayed steering response.
The Giti GitiWinter W2 performs well on snowy roads and offers good protection against aquaplaning. It also provides good mileage, offering decent value. However, its extended braking distance on wet roads and delayed steering response are significant drawbacks to consider. This tyre might be a good choice for areas with predominantly snowy winters but less ideal for regions with frequent wet conditions.

Read Reviews

15th: Kumho Winter Craft WP52

Kumho Winter Craft WP52
  • 205/55 R16 91H
  • EU Label: C/B/72
  • 3PMSF: yes
  • Price: 320.00
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking1st43 M100%
Dry Handling3rd109.9 Km/H110.6 Km/H-0.7 Km/H99.37%
Wet Braking1st54 M100%
Wet Handling4th74.94 Km/H76.01 Km/H-1.07 Km/H98.59%
Wet Circle10th12.56 s12.26 s+0.3 s97.61%
Straight Aqua20th73 Km/H84.5 Km/H-11.5 Km/H86.39%
Curved Aquaplaning20th1.98 m/sec23.93 m/sec2-1.95 m/sec250.38%
Snow Braking17th30.3 M29.1 M+1.2 M96.04%
Snow Traction17th2446 N2570 N-124 N95.18%
Snow Handling11th59.4 Km/H60.9 Km/H-1.5 Km/H97.54%
Snow Slalom14th3.21 m/sec23.31 m/sec2-0.1 m/sec296.98%
Noise15th72.1 dB70.3 dB+1.8 dB97.5%
Wear20th37350 KM50500 KM-13150 KM73.96%
Value9th8.57 Price/10006.64 Price/1000+1.93 Price/100077.48%
Rolling Resistance18th9.05 kg / t7.28 kg / t+1.77 kg / t80.44%
Balanced sporty driving dynamics and short braking distances in all weather conditions.
Low reserves in aquaplaning, low mileage.
The Kumho Wintercraft WP52 offers a balanced performance with sporty handling and short braking distances across various weather conditions. However, its low resistance to aquaplaning and low mileage are significant drawbacks. This tyre might appeal to drivers who enjoy responsive handling in winter conditions but may not be the best choice for those prioritizing longevity or frequently driving in heavy rain.

Read Reviews

16th: Barum Polaris 5

Barum Polaris 5
  • 205/55 R16 91H
  • EU Label: C/C/72
  • 3PMSF: yes
  • Price: 320.00
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking17th45.5 M43 M+2.5 M94.51%
Dry Handling3rd109.9 Km/H110.6 Km/H-0.7 Km/H99.37%
Wet Braking17th58.9 M54 M+4.9 M91.68%
Wet Handling17th73.07 Km/H76.01 Km/H-2.94 Km/H96.13%
Wet Circle18th12.72 s12.26 s+0.46 s96.38%
Straight Aqua18th75.4 Km/H84.5 Km/H-9.1 Km/H89.23%
Curved Aquaplaning18th2.88 m/sec23.93 m/sec2-1.05 m/sec273.28%
Snow Braking14th30 M29.1 M+0.9 M97%
Snow Traction2nd2526 N2570 N-44 N98.29%
Snow Handling7th59.6 Km/H60.9 Km/H-1.3 Km/H97.87%
Snow Slalom10th3.23 m/sec23.31 m/sec2-0.08 m/sec297.58%
Noise15th72.1 dB70.3 dB+1.8 dB97.5%
Wear15th39500 KM50500 KM-11000 KM78.22%
Value7th8.1 Price/10006.64 Price/1000+1.46 Price/100081.98%
Rolling Resistance1st7.28 kg / t100%
Convincing winter suitability, safe driving behavior on dry roads, low rolling resistance.
Little grip in wet conditions, low reserves in danger of aquaplaning.
The Barum Polaris 5 performs well in winter conditions and on dry roads, offering safe driving behavior. Its low rolling resistance is a plus for fuel efficiency. However, its poor performance in wet conditions and low resistance to aquaplaning are significant concerns. This tyre might be suitable for areas with predominantly dry, cold winters but is less ideal for regions with wet winter conditions.

Read Reviews

16th: GT Radial WinterPro2 Evo

GT-Radial WinterPro2 Evo
  • 205/55 R16 91H
  • EU Label: D/B/70
  • 3PMSF: yes
  • Price: 280.00
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking15th45.2 M43 M+2.2 M95.13%
Dry Handling19th108.3 Km/H110.6 Km/H-2.3 Km/H97.92%
Wet Braking5th56.2 M54 M+2.2 M96.09%
Wet Handling19th72.77 Km/H76.01 Km/H-3.24 Km/H95.74%
Wet Circle17th12.71 s12.26 s+0.45 s96.46%
Straight Aqua19th75.3 Km/H84.5 Km/H-9.2 Km/H89.11%
Curved Aquaplaning19th2.68 m/sec23.93 m/sec2-1.25 m/sec268.19%
Snow Braking6th29.3 M29.1 M+0.2 M99.32%
Snow Traction9th2486 N2570 N-84 N96.73%
Snow Handling2nd60.4 Km/H60.9 Km/H-0.5 Km/H99.18%
Snow Slalom14th3.21 m/sec23.31 m/sec2-0.1 m/sec296.98%
Noise2nd70.8 dB70.3 dB+0.5 dB99.29%
Wear17th38335 KM50500 KM-12165 KM75.91%
Value3rd7.3 Price/10006.64 Price/1000+0.66 Price/100090.96%
Rolling Resistance15th8.79 kg / t7.28 kg / t+1.51 kg / t82.82%
Good winter suitability and safe driving characteristics on wet roads.
Delayed steering response, limited mileage.
The GT Radial Winterpro 2 evo demonstrates good performance in winter conditions and offers safe handling on wet roads. However, its delayed steering response might affect the overall driving experience, and its limited mileage could be a concern for value-conscious buyers. This tyre could be a decent budget option for those in areas with moderate winters but may not be ideal for drivers seeking responsive handling or long-term value.

Read Reviews

18th: Fulda Kristall Control HP2

Fulda Kristall Control HP2
  • 205/55 R16 91H
  • EU Label: C/C/72
  • 3PMSF: yes
  • Price: 360.00
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking20th46.4 M43 M+3.4 M92.67%
Dry Handling9th109.3 Km/H110.6 Km/H-1.3 Km/H98.82%
Wet Braking20th60.3 M54 M+6.3 M89.55%
Wet Handling20th71.49 Km/H76.01 Km/H-4.52 Km/H94.05%
Wet Circle20th12.84 s12.26 s+0.58 s95.48%
Straight Aqua14th79.5 Km/H84.5 Km/H-5 Km/H94.08%
Curved Aquaplaning6th3.58 m/sec23.93 m/sec2-0.35 m/sec291.09%
Snow Braking11th29.6 M29.1 M+0.5 M98.31%
Snow Traction10th2483 N2570 N-87 N96.61%
Snow Handling3rd60.2 Km/H60.9 Km/H-0.7 Km/H98.85%
Snow Slalom5th3.29 m/sec23.31 m/sec2-0.02 m/sec299.4%
Noise20th72.9 dB70.3 dB+2.6 dB96.43%
Wear10th41810 KM50500 KM-8690 KM82.79%
Value10th8.61 Price/10006.64 Price/1000+1.97 Price/100077.12%
Rolling Resistance17th8.92 kg / t7.28 kg / t+1.64 kg / t81.61%
Good and safe driving characteristics on wet and dry roads.
Limited winter suitability, low mileage, high rolling resistance.
The Fulda Kristall Control HP 2 offers good performance on both wet and dry roads, providing safe driving characteristics. However, its limited suitability for winter conditions is a significant drawback for a winter tyre. Combined with low mileage and high rolling resistance, this tyre may not offer the best value or performance for true winter conditions. It might be more suitable for areas with mild winters where severe snow and ice are rare.

Read Reviews

18th: Firestone Winterhawk 4

Firestone Winterhawk 4
  • 205/55 R16 91H
  • EU Label: C/B/71
  • 3PMSF: yes
  • Price: 320.00
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking19th46.3 M43 M+3.3 M92.87%
Dry Handling20th108.2 Km/H110.6 Km/H-2.4 Km/H97.83%
Wet Braking3rd55.4 M54 M+1.4 M97.47%
Wet Handling16th73.24 Km/H76.01 Km/H-2.77 Km/H96.36%
Wet Circle15th12.67 s12.26 s+0.41 s96.76%
Straight Aqua3rd83.9 Km/H84.5 Km/H-0.6 Km/H99.29%
Curved Aquaplaning8th3.48 m/sec23.93 m/sec2-0.45 m/sec288.55%
Snow Braking20th30.9 M29.1 M+1.8 M94.17%
Snow Traction19th2427 N2570 N-143 N94.44%
Snow Handling14th59 Km/H60.9 Km/H-1.9 Km/H96.88%
Snow Slalom20th3.12 m/sec23.31 m/sec2-0.19 m/sec294.26%
Noise6th71.2 dB70.3 dB+0.9 dB98.74%
Wear18th37400 KM50500 KM-13100 KM74.06%
Value8th8.56 Price/10006.64 Price/1000+1.92 Price/100077.57%
Rolling Resistance8th8.02 kg / t7.28 kg / t+0.74 kg / t90.77%
Good winter suitability and safe driving characteristics on dry roads.
Limited grip and extended braking distances on wet roads.
The Firestone Winterhawk 4 performs well in winter conditions and offers safe handling on dry roads. However, its poor performance on wet roads, including limited grip and extended braking distances, is a significant drawback. This tyre might be suitable for areas with predominantly dry, cold winters but could be problematic in regions with frequent wet conditions during winter.

Read Reviews

20th: Yokohama BluEarth Winter V906 plus

Yokohama BluEarth Winter V906  plus
  • 205/55 R16 91H
  • EU Label: D/B/71
  • 3PMSF: yes
  • Price: 380.00
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking4th43.9 M43 M+0.9 M97.95%
Dry Handling9th109.3 Km/H110.6 Km/H-1.3 Km/H98.82%
Wet Braking11th57.9 M54 M+3.9 M93.26%
Wet Handling12th73.75 Km/H76.01 Km/H-2.26 Km/H97.03%
Wet Circle4th12.4 s12.26 s+0.14 s98.87%
Straight Aqua9th81.1 Km/H84.5 Km/H-3.4 Km/H95.98%
Curved Aquaplaning12th3.28 m/sec23.93 m/sec2-0.65 m/sec283.46%
Snow Braking19th30.8 M29.1 M+1.7 M94.48%
Snow Traction20th2271 N2570 N-299 N88.37%
Snow Handling20th57.5 Km/H60.9 Km/H-3.4 Km/H94.42%
Snow Slalom17th3.15 m/sec23.31 m/sec2-0.16 m/sec295.17%
Noise12th71.7 dB70.3 dB+1.4 dB98.05%
Wear19th37360 KM50500 KM-13140 KM73.98%
Value17th10.17 Price/10006.64 Price/1000+3.53 Price/100065.29%
Rolling Resistance19th9.75 kg / t7.28 kg / t+2.47 kg / t74.67%
Good and safe driving characteristics on wet and dry roads.
Limited winter suitability, low mileage, high rolling resistance.
The Yokohama BluEarth Winter V906+ demonstrates good performance on both wet and dry roads, offering safe driving characteristics in these conditions. However, its limited suitability for winter conditions is a significant drawback for a tyre marketed as a winter product. The low mileage suggests it may wear out faster than competitors, potentially increasing long-term costs. Additionally, the high rolling resistance could negatively impact fuel efficiency. While this tyre might perform adequately in milder climates with infrequent snow, it may not be the best choice for areas with harsh winters or for drivers seeking long-term value and fuel efficiency.

Read Reviews


Discussion:

comments powered by Disqus