Menu

A newer edition of this test is out: 2026 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test

Test source Auto Bild

2024 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test

Overall test winnerVredestein Quatrac

As usual, no one does it better than AutoBild. Since revealing the best 15 all season tyres in wet and dry braking, they put the victors through to their full barrage of tests, which includes wear testing!It's a really fascinating in depth…

Tyres tested
15
Tested size
225/50 R17
Disciplines
17

At a glance

Tyre shortlist

15 Tyres tested

Published finishing positions, with the strengths and considerations from this test. Owner reviews cover other sizes and driving conditions.

1st

Vredestein Quatrac

+Balanced performance at the highest level, good reserves in aquaplaning, short braking distances, sporty and safe handling behavior, direct steering response.

−Slightly increased rolling resistance.

Read full verdict
2nd

Continental AllSeasonContact 2

+Balanced performance level with strong performance in snow and ice, short braking distances, good grip, sporty and safe driving behavior on wet tracks.

−Average aquaplaning reserves, increased price level.

Read full verdict
3rd

Michelin CrossClimate 2

+Strong performance and short braking distances on dry and snowy tracks, very good mileage, low rolling resistance.

−Slightly extended braking distances on wet roads.

Read full verdict
4th

Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3

+Balanced good performance at a high level, good reserves in aquaplaning, short braking distances, sporty and safe handling behavior in all weather conditions.

−Average mileage.

Read full verdict
5th

Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3

+Strong driving performance and short braking distances on wet and dry tracks, very good safety reserves in aquaplaning.

−Satisfactory mileage, increased price.

Read full verdict
6th

Dunlop All Season 2

+Balanced good performance level without serious weaknesses, best mileage in the test, best score in the cost chapter.

−Moderate lateral guidance on snow, extended wet braking distances.

Read full verdict
7th

Kleber Quadraxer 3

+Convincingly strong performance with short braking distances on snow and dry tracks, good aquaplaning reserves.

−Moderate grip and extended braking distances on wet tracks.

Read full verdict
8th

Giti AllSeason AS2

+Strong performance with short braking distances on snow and ice, good aquaplaning reserves, sporty and safe handling on wet and dry roads.

−Slightly extended wet braking distances, satisfactory mileage.

Read full verdict
9th

GT Radial ClimateActive

+Convincingly good performance with short braking distances on snowy tracks, safe handling on wet and dry roads.

−Limited mileage, slightly extended wet braking distance.

Read full verdict
10th

BFGoodrich Advantage All Season

+Impressive performance with short braking distances on snow and dry roads, good aquaplaning reserves, high mileage.

−Moderate grip and extended braking distances in wet conditions.

Read full verdict
11th

Viking Fourtech Plus

+Safe handling behavior on wet and dry roads, good reserves in aquaplaning.

−Moderate grip with only satisfactory handling on snow, moderate mileage.

Read full verdict
12th

Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6

+Perfect performance with safe handling and short braking distances on wet and dry tracks, good mileage.

−Weak performance on snow.

Read full verdict
13th

Kumho Solus 4S HA32+

+Safe handling behavior on wet and dry tracks, good driving comfort.

−Moderate reserves in aquaplaning, weak grip snow, low mileage, increased rolling resistance.

14th

Toyo Celsius AS2

+Balanced driving behavior on dry roads, very good mileage.

−Weak performance on snow, little grip with extended braking distances in wet conditions.

Read full verdict
15th

Linglong Grip Master 4S

+Safe handling behavior on dry tracks, good comfort, high mileage.

−Weak performance on snowy and wet roads, moderate reserves in the risk of aquaplaning.

Read full verdict

Tyre shortlist

Compare selected tyres

2024 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test · 225/50 R17

Explore the complete results →

The full test

The evidence behind the verdict

As usual, no one does it better than AutoBild. Since revealing the best 15 all season tyres in wet and dry braking, they put the victors through to their full barrage of tests, which includes wear testing!

It's a really fascinating in depth look at the best of the all season tyres in the popular 225/50 R17 size, check out all the data below. The Bridgestone was the best in the pre-test, best in both dry and wet braking, but can it continue its dominance now that there's 15 more categories to grade? 

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Recorded test conditions

Recorded test conditions

Dry Braking
100 → 0 km/h
Wet Braking
100 → 0 km/h
Snow Braking
50 → 0 km/h

Dry

The dry braking test reveals a significant 6.3-meter difference between the best and worst all-season tyres. The Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 performed exceptionally well, stopping in just 36.8 meters, which is only 1.9 meters behind the reference summer tyre. In contrast, the Viking Fourtech Plus required 43.1 meters to stop, even underperforming the reference winter tyre by 0.8 meters.

Dry Braking

Dry braking in meters (100 - 0 km/h)

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to bestResidual speed
RefReference Summer
34.9 m -1.90 m 0 km/h
36.8 m Best 0 km/h
36.9 m +0.10 m 7 km/h
37.9 m +1.10 m 22 km/h
38.5 m +1.70 m 27 km/h
38.9 m +2.10 m 30 km/h
39.9 m +3.10 m 36 km/h
40 m +3.20 m 37 km/h
40.2 m +3.40 m 38 km/h
40.2 m +3.40 m 38 km/h
40.6 m +3.80 m 40 km/h
40.9 m +4.10 m 41 km/h
41.5 m +4.70 m 44 km/h
41.6 m +4.80 m 44 km/h
RefReference Winter
42.3 m +5.50 m 47 km/h
42.5 m +5.70 m 48 km/h
43.1 m +6.30 m 50 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 23.5% (8.2 m ≈ 1.8 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Viking Fourtech Plus would still be travelling at 50 km/h when the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

In dry handling, the gap between the best and worst all-season tyres narrowed to an average speed difference of 2.3 km/h over the lap. The Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 again led the pack with an average speed of 96 km/h, matching the reference summer tyre. The Linglong Grip Master 4S trailed behind at 93.7 km/h, still outperforming the reference winter tyre by 1.2 km/h. Notably, the Viking Fourtech Plus, which struggled in dry braking, showed improvement in dry handling, ranking 6th among all-season tyres.

Dry Handling

Dry Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Dry Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
96.5 km/h +0.50 km/h
96 km/h Best
95.9 km/h -0.10 km/h
95.8 km/h -0.20 km/h
95.5 km/h -0.50 km/h
95.3 km/h -0.70 km/h
94.8 km/h -1.20 km/h
94.5 km/h -1.50 km/h
94.5 km/h -1.50 km/h
94.4 km/h -1.60 km/h
94.3 km/h -1.70 km/h
94.2 km/h -1.80 km/h
94.1 km/h -1.90 km/h
94 km/h -2.00 km/h
93.9 km/h -2.10 km/h
93.7 km/h -2.30 km/h
RefReference Winter
92.5 km/h -3.50 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 4.1% (4 Km/H).

Wet

Wet braking performance varied widely among all-season tyres, with a 9.3-meter difference between the best and worst. The Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 continued its strong performance, stopping in 50.5 meters, though still 2.9 meters behind the reference summer tyre. The Linglong Grip Master 4S struggled most, requiring 59.8 meters to stop, which was 2.4 meters worse than the reference winter tyre.

Wet Braking

Wet braking in meters (100 - 0 km/h)

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to bestResidual speed
RefReference Summer
47.6 m -2.90 m 0 km/h
50.5 m Best 0 km/h
53.5 m +3.00 m 31 km/h
53.6 m +3.10 m 31 km/h
55.2 m +4.70 m 38 km/h
55.4 m +4.90 m 39 km/h
55.4 m +4.90 m 39 km/h
56.4 m +5.90 m 42 km/h
56.6 m +6.10 m 43 km/h
57.3 m +6.80 m 45 km/h
RefReference Winter
57.4 m +6.90 m 45 km/h
57.9 m +7.40 m 46 km/h
58.4 m +7.90 m 48 km/h
58.6 m +8.10 m 48 km/h
59 m +8.50 m 49 km/h
59 m +8.50 m 49 km/h
59.8 m +9.30 m 51 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 25.6% (12.2 m ≈ 2.7 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Linglong Grip Master 4S would still be travelling at 51 km/h when the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

The wet handling test showed a significant 6.7 km/h difference between the top and bottom performers. The Continental AllSeasonContact 2 led with an average speed of 75.3 km/h, just 3 km/h slower than the reference summer tyre. The Toyo Celsius AS2 struggled most, managing only 68.6 km/h, which was 2.2 km/h slower than the reference winter tyre. Interestingly, the Linglong Grip Master 4S, which performed poorly in wet braking, showed slight improvement in wet handling, though still ranking near the bottom.

Wet Handling

Wet Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Wet Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
78.3 km/h +3.00 km/h
75.3 km/h Best
75.2 km/h -0.10 km/h
75.1 km/h -0.20 km/h
74.3 km/h -1.00 km/h
74.1 km/h -1.20 km/h
73.9 km/h -1.40 km/h
72.5 km/h -2.80 km/h
72.4 km/h -2.90 km/h
72.3 km/h -3.00 km/h
72.1 km/h -3.20 km/h
71.9 km/h -3.40 km/h
71.3 km/h -4.00 km/h
RefReference Winter
70.8 km/h -4.50 km/h
70.6 km/h -4.70 km/h
69.5 km/h -5.80 km/h
68.6 km/h -6.70 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 12.4% (9.7 Km/H).

In straight aquaplaning resistance, there was a 10 km/h difference between the best and worst tyres. The Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3 excelled with a float speed of 79.4 km/h, outperforming even the reference summer tyre by 1.8 km/h. The Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus struggled most, with a float speed of just 69.4 km/h, which was 6.4 km/h slower than the reference winter tyre.

Straight Aqua

Float Speed in Km/H

Higher is better ↑
Straight Aqua
Position / TyreResultGap to best
79.4 km/h Best
RefReference Summer
77.6 km/h -1.80 km/h
76.4 km/h -3.00 km/h
75.9 km/h -3.50 km/h
RefReference Winter
75.8 km/h -3.60 km/h
75.3 km/h -4.10 km/h
75 km/h -4.40 km/h
74.9 km/h -4.50 km/h
74.7 km/h -4.70 km/h
74.4 km/h -5.00 km/h
74.3 km/h -5.10 km/h
74.3 km/h -5.10 km/h
72.9 km/h -6.50 km/h
72.8 km/h -6.60 km/h
72.6 km/h -6.80 km/h
71 km/h -8.40 km/h
69.4 km/h -10.00 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 12.6% (10 Km/H).

Snow

Snow braking performance varied by 3 meters among all-season tyres. The GT Radial ClimateActive performed best, stopping in 23.3 meters, matching the reference winter tyre. The Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6, which excelled in dry and wet conditions, struggled most in snow, requiring 26.3 meters to stop. However, all all-season tyres significantly outperformed the reference summer tyre, which needed 60.3 meters to stop in snow.

Snow Braking

Snow braking in meters (50 - 0 km/h)

Lower is better ↓
Snow Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to bestResidual speed
RefReference Winter
22.7 m -0.60 m 0 km/h
23.3 m Best 0 km/h
23.4 m +0.10 m 8 km/h
23.8 m +0.50 m 19 km/h
23.9 m +0.60 m 21 km/h
23.9 m +0.60 m 21 km/h
24 m +0.70 m 22 km/h
24.1 m +0.80 m 24 km/h
24.3 m +1.00 m 26 km/h
24.3 m +1.00 m 26 km/h
24.4 m +1.10 m 28 km/h
24.4 m +1.10 m 28 km/h
25.4 m +2.10 m 37 km/h
25.5 m +2.20 m 38 km/h
25.6 m +2.30 m 39 km/h
26.3 m +3.00 m 44 km/h
RefReference Summer
60.3 m +37.00 m 102 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 165.6% (37.6 m ≈ 8.4 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 would still be travelling at 44 km/h when the GT Radial ClimateActive had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Snow traction showed a considerable difference of 390 N between the best and worst tyres. The BFGoodrich Advantage All Season led with 2745 N of pulling force, nearly matching the reference winter tyre's 2866 N. The Toyo Celsius AS2 provided the least traction at 2355 N. Again, all all-season tyres vastly outperformed the reference summer tyre, which managed only 1040 N of pulling force in snow.

Snow Traction

Pulling Force in Newtons

Higher is better ↑
Snow Traction
Position / TyreResultGap to best
RefReference Winter
2866 N +121.00 N
2745 N Best
2727 N -18.00 N
2698 N -47.00 N
2688 N -57.00 N
2682 N -63.00 N
2668 N -77.00 N
2653 N -92.00 N
2645 N -100.00 N
2610 N -135.00 N
2609 N -136.00 N
2605 N -140.00 N
2601 N -144.00 N
2528 N -217.00 N
2459 N -286.00 N
2355 N -390.00 N
RefReference Summer
1040 N -1,705.00 N

The difference between best and worst was 63.7% (1,826 N).

The snow handling test revealed an average speed difference of 5.4 km/h difference between the top and bottom performers. The Continental AllSeasonContact 2 led with an average speed of 55.4 km/h, slightly outperforming the reference winter tyre. The Toyo Celsius AS2 struggled most, managing only 50 km/h. The Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6, which performed poorly in snow braking, showed some improvement in snow handling, ranking 12th among all-season tyres.

Snow Handling

Snow handling average speed

Higher is better ↑
Snow Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
55.4 km/h Best
55.1 km/h -0.30 km/h
RefReference Winter
54.9 km/h -0.50 km/h
54.7 km/h -0.70 km/h
54.4 km/h -1.00 km/h
53.9 km/h -1.50 km/h
53.3 km/h -2.10 km/h
53 km/h -2.40 km/h
52.9 km/h -2.50 km/h
52.6 km/h -2.80 km/h
52.5 km/h -2.90 km/h
52.4 km/h -3.00 km/h
51.9 km/h -3.50 km/h
51.6 km/h -3.80 km/h
51.6 km/h -3.80 km/h
50 km/h -5.40 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 9.7% (5.4 Km/H).

Comfort

External noise levels varied by 1.4 dB among the all-season tyres. The GT Radial ClimateActive was the quietest at 71.7 dB, while the Dunlop All Season 2 was the loudest at 73.1 dB. All all-season tyres were quieter than the reference summer tyre (74.6 dB), with most also outperforming the reference winter tyre (72.3 dB).

Noise

External noise in dB

Lower is better ↓
Noise
Position / TyreResultGap to best
71.7 dB Best
71.8 dB +0.10 dB
72 dB +0.30 dB
72 dB +0.30 dB
72 dB +0.30 dB
72 dB +0.30 dB
72.2 dB +0.50 dB
RefReference Winter
72.3 dB +0.60 dB
72.4 dB +0.70 dB
72.4 dB +0.70 dB
72.5 dB +0.80 dB
72.5 dB +0.80 dB
72.7 dB +1.00 dB
72.8 dB +1.10 dB
73 dB +1.30 dB
73.1 dB +1.40 dB
RefReference Summer
74.6 dB +2.90 dB

The difference between best and worst was 4% (2.9 dB).

Value

Predicted tread life varied significantly, with a difference of 26,610 km between the most and least durable tyres. The Dunlop All Season 2 led with an impressive 67,410 km, while the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus and Giti AllSeason AS2 tied for the shortest tread life at 40,800 km.

Wear

Predicted tread life in KM

Higher is better ↑
Wear
Position / TyreResultGap to best
67,410 KM Best
63,870 KM -3,540 KM
62,680 KM -4,730 KM
55,140 KM -12,270 KM
54,800 KM -12,610 KM
50,270 KM -17,140 KM
49,430 KM -17,980 KM
49,330 KM -18,080 KM
49,300 KM -18,110 KM
45,360 KM -22,050 KM
42,900 KM -24,510 KM
42,330 KM -25,080 KM
41,400 KM -26,010 KM
40,800 KM -26,610 KM
40,800 KM -26,610 KM

The difference between best and worst was 39.5% (26,610 KM).

The value assessment, which considers the price per 1000 km of tread life, showed a significant difference between the most and least cost-effective tyres. The Linglong Grip Master 4S offered the best value at 7.2 euros per 1000 km, while the Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3 was the least economical at 13.23 euros per 1000 km - nearly twice as expensive over its lifespan.

Interestingly, some tyres that performed well in other tests didn't necessarily offer the best value. For example, the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6, which excelled in many performance categories, ranked 6th in terms of value. Conversely, the Toyo Celsius AS2, which struggled in several performance tests, offered the second-best value at 7.36 euros per 1000 km.

Value

Euros/1000km based on cost/wear

Lower is better ↓
Value
Position / TyreResultGap to bestcost per 1,000 km
7.2 Price/1000 Best €16.03
7.36 Price/1000 +0.16 Price/1000 €8.45
7.57 Price/1000 +0.37 Price/1000 €9.68
9.34 Price/1000 +2.14 Price/1000 €13.18
10.15 Price/1000 +2.95 Price/1000 €12.75
10.31 Price/1000 +3.11 Price/1000 €16.20
10.69 Price/1000 +3.49 Price/1000 €11.88
11.03 Price/1000 +3.83 Price/1000 €11.60
11.1 Price/1000 +3.90 Price/1000 €19.05
11.96 Price/1000 +4.76 Price/1000 €15.15
12 Price/1000 +4.80 Price/1000 €15.03
12.57 Price/1000 +5.37 Price/1000 €14.52
12.79 Price/1000 +5.59 Price/1000 €16.37
12.99 Price/1000 +5.79 Price/1000 €16.07
13.23 Price/1000 +6.03 Price/1000 €17.96

The difference between best and worst was 83.8% (6.03 Price/1000). Over 40,000 km the cheapest tyre to own (Toyo Celsius AS2) works out €424 cheaper than the most expensive (Kumho Solus 4S HA32+).

How this is calculated

Assumes a typical car using 8 l/100km (with rolling resistance causing 20% of fuel use), fuel at €1.65 per litre and €70 fitting per set of four. Purchase prices are from the time of the 2024 test; financing costs are excluded.

Rolling resistance varied by 2.07 kg/t between the best and worst performers. The Toyo Celsius AS2 had the lowest rolling resistance at 7.38 kg/t, while the Linglong Grip Master 4S had the highest at 9.45 kg/t. This translated to a difference in fuel consumption of 0.46 l/100km between the most efficient (Viking Fourtech Plus at 4.6 l/100km) and least efficient (Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus and Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3, both at 5.06 l/100km) tyres.

Rolling Resistance

Rolling resistance in kg t

Lower is better ↓
Rolling Resistance
Position / TyreResultGap to bestExtra fuel / year
7.38 kg/t Best £0
7.4 kg/t +0.02 kg/t £1
7.53 kg/t +0.15 kg/t £9
7.68 kg/t +0.30 kg/t £18
7.71 kg/t +0.33 kg/t £20
7.72 kg/t +0.34 kg/t £20
7.76 kg/t +0.38 kg/t £23
7.77 kg/t +0.39 kg/t £23
7.8 kg/t +0.42 kg/t £25
RefReference Winter
7.88 kg/t +0.50 kg/t £30
7.95 kg/t +0.57 kg/t £34
RefReference Summer
7.95 kg/t +0.57 kg/t £34
8.1 kg/t +0.72 kg/t £43
8.24 kg/t +0.86 kg/t £51
8.67 kg/t +1.29 kg/t £77
9.21 kg/t +1.83 kg/t £109
9.45 kg/t +2.07 kg/t £124

The difference between best and worst was 28% (2.07 kg / t). Over 19,000 km a year at £1.45/L, the Linglong Grip Master 4S uses about 85 L (£124) more fuel than the Toyo Celsius AS2.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions.

19,000 km
£1.45/L
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tyre age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

Fuel Consumption

Fuel consumption in Litres per 100 km

Lower is better ↓
Fuel Consumption
Position / TyreResultGap to bestExtra fuel / year
4.6 l/100km Best £0
4.74 l/100km +0.14 l/100km £39
4.77 l/100km +0.17 l/100km £47
4.77 l/100km +0.17 l/100km £47
4.78 l/100km +0.18 l/100km £50
4.79 l/100km +0.19 l/100km £52
4.8 l/100km +0.20 l/100km £55
4.81 l/100km +0.21 l/100km £58
4.82 l/100km +0.22 l/100km £61
4.91 l/100km +0.31 l/100km £85
4.91 l/100km +0.31 l/100km £85
4.92 l/100km +0.32 l/100km £88
4.93 l/100km +0.33 l/100km £91
5.06 l/100km +0.46 l/100km £127
5.06 l/100km +0.46 l/100km £127

The difference between best and worst was 10% (0.46 l/100km). Over 19,000 km a year at £1.45/L, the Kumho Solus 4S HA32+ uses about 87 L (£127) more fuel than the Viking Fourtech Plus.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions.

19,000 km
£1.45/L
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tyre age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

The abrasion test measures the total weight loss of the tyre after a standardized wear test, with lower values indicating better resistance to wear. The results showed a substantial difference in wear resistance among the tested tyres.

The Michelin CrossClimate 2 demonstrated the best wear resistance, losing only 527 grams of material. In stark contrast, the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 Plus showed the worst wear resistance, losing 1116 grams - more than twice as much as the Michelin.

Interestingly, there wasn't always a direct correlation between abrasion resistance and predicted tread life. For example, while the Michelin CrossClimate 2 had the best abrasion resistance, it ranked 3rd in predicted tread life. Conversely, the Dunlop All Season 2, which had the longest predicted tread life, ranked 2nd in abrasion resistance.

This discrepancy is mostly likely due to factors such as starting tread depth and tread pattern void ratio.

Abrasion

Total weight loss after wear test in grams

Lower is better ↓
Abrasion
Position / TyreResultGap to best
527 g Best
533 g +6.00 g
541 g +14.00 g
545 g +18.00 g
607 g +80.00 g
609 g +82.00 g
612 g +85.00 g
669 g +142.00 g
684 g +157.00 g
723 g +196.00 g
761 g +234.00 g
791 g +264.00 g
833 g +306.00 g
871 g +344.00 g
1116 g +589.00 g

The difference between best and worst was 111.8% (589 g).

Results

It's worth remembering that Auto Bild uses a downgrading system for their final results - if they determine a tyre is lacking in a single category it can't finish well in the test. This is why we see the Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3 demoted due to value, and the Bridgestone Turanza AllSeason 6 demoted due to the snow performance.

Given these are all season tyres, not winter tyres, we don't agree on the Bridgestone demotion. Remember, you can add your own score weighting on the results table to descover the best tyre for you.

1st

Vredestein Quatrac

225/50 R17 98V XL
Vredestein Quatrac
Dry94.9%
Wet96.2%
Snow94.7%
Comfort99.9%
Value85.1%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (17)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better8th / 1540.2 m+3.40 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better10th / 1594.3 km/h-1.70 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better5th / 1555.4 m+4.90 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better2nd / 1575.2 km/h-0.10 km/h
Wet CircleLower is better4th / 1511.55 s+0.15 s
Straight AquaHigher is better5th / 1575 km/h-4.40 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better4th / 153.24 m/sec2-0.23 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better7th / 1524.1 m+0.80 m
Snow TractionHigher is better11th / 152605 N-140.00 N
Snow HandlingHigher is better7th / 1553 km/h-2.40 km/h
Snow SlalomHigher is better7th / 153.97 m/sec2-0.39 m/sec2
NoiseLower is better2nd / 1571.8 dB+0.10 dB
WearHigher is better4th / 1555140 KM-12,270.00 KM
ValueLower is better4th / 159.34 Price/1000+2.14 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better11th / 158.1 kg/t+0.72 kg/t
Fuel ConsumptionLower is better10th / 154.91 l/100km+0.31 l/100km
AbrasionLower is better8th / 15669 g+142.00 g
EU Label
C/B/71
3PMSF
Yes
Weight
40.3 kgs
Price
515.00
2nd

Continental AllSeasonContact 2

225/50 R17 98Y XL
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
Dry95%
Wet96.9%
Snow97.1%
Comfort99.6%
Value79.8%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (17)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better7th / 1540 m+3.20 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better13th / 1594 km/h-2.00 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better3rd / 1553.6 m+3.10 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better1st / 1575.3 km/hBest in this discipline
Wet CircleLower is better1st / 1511.4 sBest in this discipline
Straight AquaHigher is better11th / 1572.9 km/h-6.50 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better11th / 153.04 m/sec2-0.43 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better10th / 1524.4 m+1.10 m
Snow TractionHigher is better6th / 152668 N-77.00 N
Snow HandlingHigher is better1st / 1555.4 km/hBest in this discipline
Snow SlalomHigher is better4th / 154.16 m/sec2-0.20 m/sec2
NoiseLower is better3rd / 1572 dB+0.30 dB
WearHigher is better8th / 1549330 KM-18,080.00 KM
ValueLower is better12th / 1512.57 Price/1000+5.37 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better3rd / 157.53 kg/t+0.15 kg/t
Fuel ConsumptionLower is better8th / 154.81 l/100km+0.21 l/100km
AbrasionLower is better12th / 15791 g+264.00 g
EU Label
C/B/72
3PMSF
Yes
Weight
39.2 kgs
Price
620.00
3rd

Michelin CrossClimate 2

225/50 R17 98Y XL
Michelin CrossClimate 2
Dry97.8%
Wet93%
Snow98.3%
Comfort98.9%
Value92%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (17)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better3rd / 1537.9 m+1.10 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better7th / 1594.5 km/h-1.50 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better7th / 1556.4 m+5.90 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better11th / 1571.9 km/h-3.40 km/h
Wet CircleLower is better9th / 1511.89 s+0.49 s
Straight AquaHigher is better9th / 1574.3 km/h-5.10 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better12th / 152.95 m/sec2-0.52 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better4th / 1523.9 m+0.60 m
Snow TractionHigher is better3rd / 152698 N-47.00 N
Snow HandlingHigher is better2nd / 1555.1 km/h-0.30 km/h
Snow SlalomHigher is better2nd / 154.26 m/sec2-0.10 m/sec2
NoiseLower is better10th / 1572.5 dB+0.80 dB
WearHigher is better3rd / 1562680 KM-4,730.00 KM
ValueLower is better7th / 1510.69 Price/1000+3.49 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better2nd / 157.4 kg/t+0.02 kg/t
Fuel ConsumptionLower is better5th / 154.78 l/100km+0.18 l/100km
AbrasionLower is better1st / 15527 gBest in this discipline
EU Label
B/B/71
3PMSF
Yes
Weight
37.1 kgs
Price
670.00
4th

Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3

225/50 R17 98W XL
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
Dry93.5%
Wet94.7%
Snow96.7%
Comfort99%
Value80%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (17)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better12th / 1541.5 m+4.70 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better9th / 1594.4 km/h-1.60 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better4th / 1555.2 m+4.70 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better7th / 1572.5 km/h-2.80 km/h
Wet CircleLower is better8th / 1511.76 s+0.36 s
Straight AquaHigher is better8th / 1574.4 km/h-5.00 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better4th / 153.24 m/sec2-0.23 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better4th / 1523.9 m+0.60 m
Snow TractionHigher is better4th / 152688 N-57.00 N
Snow HandlingHigher is better3rd / 1554.7 km/h-0.70 km/h
Snow SlalomHigher is better6th / 154.02 m/sec2-0.34 m/sec2
NoiseLower is better8th / 1572.4 dB+0.70 dB
WearHigher is better10th / 1545360 KM-22,050.00 KM
ValueLower is better13th / 1512.79 Price/1000+5.59 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better10th / 157.95 kg/t+0.57 kg/t
Fuel ConsumptionLower is better10th / 154.91 l/100km+0.31 l/100km
AbrasionLower is better7th / 15612 g+85.00 g
EU Label
C/B/70
3PMSF
Yes
Weight
38 kgs
Price
580.00
5th

Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3

225/50 R17 98W XL
Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3
Dry99.8%
Wet97.7%
Snow94.9%
Comfort98.9%
Value75.2%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (17)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better2nd / 1536.9 m+0.10 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better3rd / 1595.8 km/h-0.20 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better2nd / 1553.5 m+3.00 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better3rd / 1575.1 km/h-0.20 km/h
Wet CircleLower is better3rd / 1511.53 s+0.13 s
Straight AquaHigher is better1st / 1579.4 km/hBest in this discipline
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better3rd / 153.32 m/sec2-0.15 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better12th / 1525.4 m+2.10 m
Snow TractionHigher is better5th / 152682 N-63.00 N
Snow HandlingHigher is better6th / 1553.3 km/h-2.10 km/h
Snow SlalomHigher is better5th / 154.12 m/sec2-0.24 m/sec2
NoiseLower is better10th / 1572.5 dB+0.80 dB
WearHigher is better12th / 1542330 KM-25,080.00 KM
ValueLower is better15th / 1513.23 Price/1000+6.03 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better12th / 158.24 kg/t+0.86 kg/t
Fuel ConsumptionLower is better14th / 155.06 l/100km+0.46 l/100km
AbrasionLower is better10th / 15723 g+196.00 g
EU Label
C/A/72
3PMSF
Yes
Weight
38.7 kgs
Price
560.00
6th

Dunlop All Season 2

225/50 R17 98W XL
Dunlop All Season 2
Dry93.1%
Wet94.1%
Snow93.7%
Comfort98.1%
Value97.2%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (17)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better13th / 1541.6 m+4.80 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better14th / 1593.9 km/h-2.10 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better9th / 1557.3 m+6.80 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better8th / 1572.4 km/h-2.90 km/h
Wet CircleLower is better5th / 1511.63 s+0.23 s
Straight AquaHigher is better12th / 1572.8 km/h-6.60 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better2nd / 153.36 m/sec2-0.11 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better10th / 1524.4 m+1.10 m
Snow TractionHigher is better9th / 152610 N-135.00 N
Snow HandlingHigher is better10th / 1552.5 km/h-2.90 km/h
Snow SlalomHigher is better12th / 153.87 m/sec2-0.49 m/sec2
NoiseLower is better15th / 1573.1 dB+1.40 dB
WearHigher is better1st / 1567410 KMBest in this discipline
ValueLower is better3rd / 157.57 Price/1000+0.37 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better4th / 157.68 kg/t+0.30 kg/t
Fuel ConsumptionLower is better6th / 154.79 l/100km+0.19 l/100km
AbrasionLower is better2nd / 15533 g+6.00 g
EU Label
B/C/72
3PMSF
Yes
Weight
36 kgs
Price
510.00
7th

Kleber Quadraxer 3

225/50 R17 98W XL
Kleber Quadraxer 3
Dry97%
Wet92%
Snow97.3%
Comfort99.6%
Value87%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (17)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better4th / 1538.5 m+1.70 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better7th / 1594.5 km/h-1.50 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better11th / 1558.4 m+7.90 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better12th / 1571.3 km/h-4.00 km/h
Wet CircleLower is better11th / 1512.01 s+0.61 s
Straight AquaHigher is better4th / 1575.3 km/h-4.10 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better9th / 153.11 m/sec2-0.36 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better8th / 1524.3 m+1.00 m
Snow TractionHigher is better2nd / 152727 N-18.00 N
Snow HandlingHigher is better5th / 1553.9 km/h-1.50 km/h
Snow SlalomHigher is better3rd / 154.22 m/sec2-0.14 m/sec2
NoiseLower is better3rd / 1572 dB+0.30 dB
WearHigher is better6th / 1550270 KM-17,140.00 KM
ValueLower is better5th / 1510.15 Price/1000+2.95 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better6th / 157.72 kg/t+0.34 kg/t
Fuel ConsumptionLower is better7th / 154.8 l/100km+0.20 l/100km
AbrasionLower is better4th / 15545 g+18.00 g
EU Label
C/B/69
3PMSF
Yes
Weight
38.6 kgs
Price
510.00
8th

Giti AllSeason AS2

225/50 R17 98W XL
Giti AllSeason AS2
Dry95.1%
Wet93.8%
Snow95.1%
Comfort99.6%
Value75.4%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (17)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better10th / 1540.6 m+3.80 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better4th / 1595.5 km/h-0.50 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better12th / 1558.6 m+8.10 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better5th / 1574.1 km/h-1.20 km/h
Wet CircleLower is better6th / 1511.66 s+0.26 s
Straight AquaHigher is better9th / 1574.3 km/h-5.10 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better8th / 153.15 m/sec2-0.32 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better2nd / 1523.4 m+0.10 m
Snow TractionHigher is better10th / 152609 N-136.00 N
Snow HandlingHigher is better9th / 1552.6 km/h-2.80 km/h
Snow SlalomHigher is better8th / 153.92 m/sec2-0.44 m/sec2
NoiseLower is better3rd / 1572 dB+0.30 dB
WearHigher is better14th / 1540800 KM-26,610.00 KM
ValueLower is better14th / 1512.99 Price/1000+5.79 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better7th / 157.76 kg/t+0.38 kg/t
Fuel ConsumptionLower is better9th / 154.82 l/100km+0.22 l/100km
AbrasionLower is better13th / 15833 g+306.00 g
EU Label
C/A/71
3PMSF
Yes
Weight
42.8 kgs
Price
530.00
9th

GT Radial ClimateActive

225/50 R17 98W XL
GT Radial ClimateActive
Dry94.1%
Wet94.1%
Snow95.6%
Comfort100%
Value76%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (17)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better11th / 1540.9 m+4.10 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better11th / 1594.2 km/h-1.80 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better8th / 1556.6 m+6.10 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better6th / 1573.9 km/h-1.40 km/h
Wet CircleLower is better6th / 1511.66 s+0.26 s
Straight AquaHigher is better13th / 1572.6 km/h-6.80 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better12th / 152.95 m/sec2-0.52 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better1st / 1523.3 mBest in this discipline
Snow TractionHigher is better8th / 152645 N-100.00 N
Snow HandlingHigher is better8th / 1552.9 km/h-2.50 km/h
Snow SlalomHigher is better8th / 153.92 m/sec2-0.44 m/sec2
NoiseLower is better1st / 1571.7 dBBest in this discipline
WearHigher is better11th / 1542900 KM-24,510.00 KM
ValueLower is better11th / 1512 Price/1000+4.80 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better8th / 157.77 kg/t+0.39 kg/t
Fuel ConsumptionLower is better12th / 154.92 l/100km+0.32 l/100km
AbrasionLower is better14th / 15871 g+344.00 g
EU Label
C/A/70
3PMSF
Yes
Weight
42.9 kgs
Price
515.00
10th

BFGoodrich Advantage All Season

225/50 R17 98W XL
BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
Dry97.3%
Wet91.2%
Snow98.9%
Comfort99.3%
Value84.4%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (17)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better5th / 1538.9 m+2.10 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better2nd / 1595.9 km/h-0.10 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better13th / 1559 m+8.50 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better13th / 1570.6 km/h-4.70 km/h
Wet CircleLower is better12th / 1512.1 s+0.70 s
Straight AquaHigher is better6th / 1574.9 km/h-4.50 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better10th / 153.09 m/sec2-0.38 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better3rd / 1523.8 m+0.50 m
Snow TractionHigher is better1st / 152745 NBest in this discipline
Snow HandlingHigher is better4th / 1554.4 km/h-1.00 km/h
Snow SlalomHigher is better1st / 154.36 m/sec2Best in this discipline
NoiseLower is better7th / 1572.2 dB+0.50 dB
WearHigher is better7th / 1549430 KM-17,980.00 KM
ValueLower is better8th / 1511.03 Price/1000+3.83 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better5th / 157.71 kg/t+0.33 kg/t
Fuel ConsumptionLower is better2nd / 154.74 l/100km+0.14 l/100km
AbrasionLower is better6th / 15609 g+82.00 g
EU Label
C/B/69
3PMSF
Yes
Weight
38.8 kgs
Price
445.00
11th

Viking Fourtech+

225/50 R17 98W XL
Viking Fourtech Plus
Dry92.1%
Wet94.3%
Snow92.7%
Comfort98.5%
Value78.3%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (17)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better15th / 1543.1 m+6.30 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better6th / 1594.8 km/h-1.20 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better5th / 1555.4 m+4.90 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better10th / 1572.1 km/h-3.20 km/h
Wet CircleLower is better12th / 1512.1 s+0.70 s
Straight AquaHigher is better3rd / 1575.9 km/h-3.50 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better1st / 153.47 m/sec2Best in this discipline
Snow BrakingLower is better8th / 1524.3 m+1.00 m
Snow TractionHigher is better7th / 152653 N-92.00 N
Snow HandlingHigher is better13th / 1551.6 km/h-3.80 km/h
Snow SlalomHigher is better14th / 153.68 m/sec2-0.68 m/sec2
NoiseLower is better13th / 1572.8 dB+1.10 dB
WearHigher is better13th / 1541400 KM-26,010.00 KM
ValueLower is better10th / 1511.96 Price/1000+4.76 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better9th / 157.8 kg/t+0.42 kg/t
Fuel ConsumptionLower is better1st / 154.6 l/100kmBest in this discipline
AbrasionLower is better11th / 15761 g+234.00 g
EU Label
C/B/72
3PMSF
Yes
Weight
38.8 kgs
Price
495.00
12th

Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6

225/50 R17 98V XL
Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6
Dry100%
Wet98.6%
Snow90.5%
Comfort98.2%
Value84.5%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (17)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better1st / 1536.8 mBest in this discipline
Dry HandlingHigher is better1st / 1596 km/hBest in this discipline
Wet BrakingLower is better1st / 1550.5 mBest in this discipline
Wet HandlingHigher is better4th / 1574.3 km/h-1.00 km/h
Wet CircleLower is better2nd / 1511.45 s+0.05 s
Straight AquaHigher is better2nd / 1576.4 km/h-3.00 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better7th / 153.18 m/sec2-0.29 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better15th / 1526.3 m+3.00 m
Snow TractionHigher is better14th / 152459 N-286.00 N
Snow HandlingHigher is better12th / 1551.9 km/h-3.50 km/h
Snow SlalomHigher is better8th / 153.92 m/sec2-0.44 m/sec2
NoiseLower is better14th / 1573 dB+1.30 dB
WearHigher is better5th / 1554800 KM-12,610.00 KM
ValueLower is better6th / 1510.31 Price/1000+3.11 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better13th / 158.67 kg/t+1.29 kg/t
Fuel ConsumptionLower is better3rd / 154.77 l/100km+0.17 l/100km
AbrasionLower is better5th / 15607 g+80.00 g
EU Label
C/B/70
3PMSF
Yes
Weight
42.3 kgs
Price
565.00
13th

Kumho Solus 4S HA32+

225/50 R17 98W XL
Kumho Solus 4S HA32+
Dry92.9%
Wet91.4%
Snow93%
Comfort99%
Value70%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (17)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better14th / 1542.5 m+5.70 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better5th / 1595.3 km/h-0.70 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better10th / 1557.9 m+7.40 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better9th / 1572.3 km/h-3.00 km/h
Wet CircleLower is better10th / 1511.9 s+0.50 s
Straight AquaHigher is better15th / 1569.4 km/h-10.00 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better15th / 152.64 m/sec2-0.83 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better6th / 1524 m+0.70 m
Snow TractionHigher is better12th / 152601 N-144.00 N
Snow HandlingHigher is better11th / 1552.4 km/h-3.00 km/h
Snow SlalomHigher is better14th / 153.68 m/sec2-0.68 m/sec2
NoiseLower is better8th / 1572.4 dB+0.70 dB
WearHigher is better14th / 1540800 KM-26,610.00 KM
ValueLower is better9th / 1511.1 Price/1000+3.90 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better14th / 159.21 kg/t+1.83 kg/t
Fuel ConsumptionLower is better14th / 155.06 l/100km+0.46 l/100km
AbrasionLower is better15th / 151116 g+589.00 g
EU Label
C/B/72
3PMSF
Yes
Weight
41.9 kgs
Price
440.00
14th

Toyo Celsius AS2

225/50 R17 98Y XL
Toyo Celsius AS2
Dry95.1%
Wet90.4%
Snow88.7%
Comfort98.6%
Value97.3%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (17)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better6th / 1539.9 m+3.10 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better12th / 1594.1 km/h-1.90 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better13th / 1559 m+8.50 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better15th / 1568.6 km/h-6.70 km/h
Wet CircleLower is better15th / 1512.26 s+0.86 s
Straight AquaHigher is better7th / 1574.7 km/h-4.70 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better4th / 153.24 m/sec2-0.23 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better13th / 1525.5 m+2.20 m
Snow TractionHigher is better15th / 152355 N-390.00 N
Snow HandlingHigher is better15th / 1550 km/h-5.40 km/h
Snow SlalomHigher is better13th / 153.78 m/sec2-0.58 m/sec2
NoiseLower is better12th / 1572.7 dB+1.00 dB
WearHigher is better2nd / 1563870 KM-3,540.00 KM
ValueLower is better2nd / 157.36 Price/1000+0.16 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better1st / 157.38 kg/tBest in this discipline
Fuel ConsumptionLower is better3rd / 154.77 l/100km+0.17 l/100km
AbrasionLower is better3rd / 15541 g+14.00 g
EU Label
C/B/71
3PMSF
Yes
Weight
37.1 kgs
Price
470.00
15th

Linglong Grip Master 4S

225/50 R17 98V XL
Linglong Grip Master 4S
Dry94.6%
Wet89.4%
Snow91.6%
Comfort99.6%
Value83.9%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (17)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better8th / 1540.2 m+3.40 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better15th / 1593.7 km/h-2.30 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better15th / 1559.8 m+9.30 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better14th / 1569.5 km/h-5.80 km/h
Wet CircleLower is better14th / 1512.25 s+0.85 s
Straight AquaHigher is better14th / 1571 km/h-8.40 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better14th / 152.89 m/sec2-0.58 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better14th / 1525.6 m+2.30 m
Snow TractionHigher is better13th / 152528 N-217.00 N
Snow HandlingHigher is better13th / 1551.6 km/h-3.80 km/h
Snow SlalomHigher is better8th / 153.92 m/sec2-0.44 m/sec2
NoiseLower is better3rd / 1572 dB+0.30 dB
WearHigher is better9th / 1549300 KM-18,110.00 KM
ValueLower is better1st / 157.2 Price/1000Best in this discipline
Rolling ResistanceLower is better15th / 159.45 kg/t+2.07 kg/t
Fuel ConsumptionLower is better13th / 154.93 l/100km+0.33 l/100km
AbrasionLower is better9th / 15684 g+157.00 g
EU Label
C/B/69
3PMSF
Yes
Weight
39.7 kgs
Price
355.00

More tyre tests

Cross-check this test

All tyre tests

Where these tyres were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Discussion

  1. No comments yet — be the first.
Rate your tyres

My tyres

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tyres

Save tyres from a tyre page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tyres. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.