Altenzo Comforter Reviews - Page 7

Given 43% while driving a BMW 320D (225/40 R18) on a combination of roads for 200 average miles
After 200 miles of dry weather driving I thought these tyres were good. However the rear end of my BMW lost grip on a couple of big roundabouts in the wet at only 15 to 20 miles an hour, These are OK in the dry, but in the wet they are scary, the tyres behave more like plastic than rubber. I am going to change them ASAP, Not impressed!
Helpful 8 - tyre reviewed on June 24, 2012
Given 97% while driving a Mercedes Benz C220 cdi (225/45 R17 W) on a combination of roads for 17,000 average miles
I have reviewed these tyres at various mileages my last one being in October 2011 after having done 10K as these are fitted to the rears.

They are still on the rears and have now done 17k and are down to 5mm all round and wearing pretty evenly. The grip levels over time and getting used to the tyres I would say are good in the dry however on a few fast corners the ESP does kick in and they can slide a little. In the wet they have been again good but when pushed to the limit the ESP is on overtime and they do slide around a lot more but you will know when they are about to let go.

In terms of comfort doing a 74 mile commute 3-4 times a week on mixed motorway and country lanes they are very comfortable and excellent cruising tyre and absorb the bumps well, they are very quiet also. I am anticipating about 25K before they are down to the wear markers.


Overall yes id buy them again as price is very reasonable.
Helpful 8 - tyre reviewed on April 7, 2012
Given 43% while driving a Ford Mondeo (235/40 R18 W) on mostly country roads for 4 average miles
Only been on the car for 4,000 miles and I am seriously looking at replacing them. Passable in the dry and good aquaplaning resitance in heavy tropical rain (1" of water on road) but they are seriously dangerous cornering in the wet. Might be ok on a RWD sedan however on a heavy, torquey FWD sedan they just are not even close to being suitable.
Helpful 8 - tyre reviewed on April 6, 2012
What to know the BEST All Season Tyres for 2024? Click to find out!
Given 87% while driving a Lexus GS300 (235/45 R17 W) on mostly country roads for 2,000 average miles
I`ve had the tyres since December(2 rear, drive wheels)on my Lexus GS300 SE,I`VE DONE ABOUT 2.500k,mostly in Cornwall in January with every type of weather you can imagine.Not once did the tyres give me any thought of hesitation,see above table.I am so pleased with them,bought from Tyre Traders for £59 EACH,THESE TYRES I BELIEVE, ARE A GREAT BREAKTHROUGH FOR BUDGET TYRES,which means better and safer alround motoring for the man in the street.Thanks again Tyre Traders and Altenzo tyres
Helpful 8 - tyre reviewed on April 6, 2012
Given 49% while driving a Ford (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 100 easy going miles
i purchase a set off these tyres with my new wheels i was very happy with the ride of these tyre in the dry but for the wet wheather driving theyre outright dangerous gave no grip what so ever in wet
Helpful 8 - tyre reviewed on March 16, 2012
Given 84% while driving a Audi A4 2.0 TFSI (205 bhp) (225/45 R17 W) on a combination of roads for 3,500 average miles
I bought a set of the Altenzo Sports Comforter tyres having done a bit of research. Dont be fooled by the price. These tyres are as good as tyres at nearly twice the price. The company is new but built on solid foundations, and these tyres have many attributes missing on the budget tyres (silica compound, assymetrical rather than directional, A rated grip etc.

I took a gamble as I would normally fit Michelins but at £267 for four tyres fully fitted rather than £670 for Michelins I decided it was worth a gamble. I have to say I dont regret it one bit. The tyres grip as well, are as fuel efficient and are much quieter. They might not last as long but who cares at that price. (Michelins only lasted 13000 miles) So far I have covered 3500 miles and the tyres still look like new with hardly any wear (still 7+mm left).

Worth buying now because as soon as Altenzo become established the prices will rocket. A few years ago Kumho were cheap, now they are more expensive than a lot of 'Premium' brands.
Helpful 8 - tyre reviewed on February 29, 2012
Given 86% while driving a Vauxhall mk5 astra 1.6 design. (205/55 R16 W) on a combination of roads for 12,000 average miles
just had 2 of these fitted to a mk5 astra at the front. recomended by halfords auto centre in birmingham. they are new to the market but they seem to think they are as good as the next 'budget' tyre at only £50 per tyre they seem cheap as the next one was £75. these were new to halfords so they have a offer on at mo. 1.2.2012. they seem a lot less noisy than the ones if just replaced (bridgestone turenza er300 as standard still on back)not sure how well they will last or if they will last on the car but time will tell as its only her car and she drives like a old lady. will update review at some point. first inpressions seem fine but remember they are budget and made in china.
Helpful 8 - tyre reviewed on February 7, 2012
Given 76% while driving a Peugeot 207 1.6hdi 9Sport) (205/45 R17 W) on a combination of roads for 12,000 easy going miles
If your not a racing driver or rally driver these tyres will be fine. I drive relatively sensibly and have not found any issues with going from Bridgestone RE050's ( run flats ), which were so hard I thought about changing them after 10 miles, to these much cheaper tyres.
Helpful 8 - tyre reviewed on January 26, 2012
Given 41% while driving a Lexus IS200 (225/45 R17 W) on a combination of roads for 15,000 average miles
Scary poor grip in the wet a fairly good quiet tyre in the dry. lasted 8000 miles on rear and 12000 on front
Helpful 8 - tyre reviewed on January 2, 2012
Given 70% while driving a Honda Accord (215/45 R17 W) on mostly country roads for 1,000 spirited miles
Very quiet & comfortable tyres, which is a plus for our rough NZ roads, wet grip is not a strong point, dry grip is reasonably good. They are certainly not a 'Sporty/Performance' tyre, (which is how the tyre dealer promoted them to me). After driving on Potenza RE050A's it certainly requires a change in how I drive. The sidewalls are fairly soft for comfort, so there's a tradeoff in steering feel.
They seem like a good 'Touring' tyre for a relaxed/average driving style, at a very good price. If that's what you're looking for, then these should be high on your list. Unfortunately they are not for me, shame.
Helpful 8 - tyre reviewed on December 24, 2011
Given 73% while driving a Mitsubishi Proton Perdana (4G63T) (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 2,000 spirited miles
lets get this straight, this tyre is cheap. so, it would not get the best scores. what i would like to gauge is the price/performance. for the price i'm getting it, it's very good.
the dry grip and braking is very good. it's incredibly comfortable and quiet. the wear is as good as any mid range tyres like Yoko C-drive or Falken 912. and the aquaplaning resistance is good. the downside is the wet grip becoz it lack silica compound. otherwise, a good all rounder for the price...
Helpful 8 - tyre reviewed on December 17, 2011
Given 44% while driving a Lexus IS200 (225/45 R17 V) on a combination of roads for 15,000 average miles
very low grip in the wet not very progressive would let go unite suddenly!
Helpful 8 - tyre reviewed on November 28, 2011