Menu
Fulda Kristall Control HP2 View Gallery (1)
155-255/35-70 R15-19 52 sizes 2021 Winter rated

Fulda Kristall Control HP2

The Fulda Kristall Control HP2 is a mid-range high-performance winter tyre that majorly impresses in snow, giving confident traction and stable, predictable handling. It also stands out for efficiency and longevity, making it an appealing value choice for drivers who want winter capability without premium pricing. However, its performance is more mixed on milder winter roads, where wet (and to a lesser extent dry) grip can lag behind key rivals.

8.0
Tyre Reviews Score Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews
High Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
83%
Wet Grip
70%
Road Feedback
78%
Handling
71%
Wear
73%
Comfort
75%
Buy again
64%
Snow Grip
61%
Ice Grip
39%
11 Reviews
68% Average
436,800 miles driven
27 Tests (avg: 12th)
Fulda Kristall Control HP2

Fulda Kristall Control HP2

Winter Mid-Range
BETA
8 / 10
Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews · High Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Snow
87.7
1.5x / 47 tests
Ice
81.6
1.2x / 4 tests
Value
77.3
0.42x / 40 tests
Wet
66.9
1.93x / 61 tests
Comfort
56.4
0.32x / 16 tests
Dry
49.9
1.13x / 27 tests

Cross-category scores are derived metrics that combine data from multiple test disciplines to evaluate real-world performance characteristics.

Traction
84.1
11 tests
Braking
72.7
61 tests
Handling
61.5
39 tests
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 27
Publications: 6
Period: 2017 - 2025
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 11
Avg Rating: 68.1%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.37
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2025 Autobild Winter Tyre Test Auto Bild 2025 225/40 R18 18/22 16 metrics
2025 Winter Tyre Braking Test - 52 Sets! Auto Bild 2025 225/40 R18 18/52 2 metrics
2025 ADAC Winter Tyre Test ADAC 2025 225/40 R18 13/31 12 metrics
2024 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test Auto Bild 2024 205/55 R16 18/23 15 metrics
2024 Winter 55 Tyre Braking Test Auto Bild 2024 205/55 R16 20/55 2 metrics
2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tyre Test ADAC 2023 205/60 R16 9/16 12 metrics
2023 Winter Tyre Test 54 Set Braking Test Auto Bild 2023 225/45 R18 23/54 2 metrics
2022 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test Auto Bild 2022 215/55 R17 19/22 16 metrics
2022 Winter Tyre Market Overview Auto Bild 2022 215/55 R17 18/57 2 metrics
2022 Auto Zeitung Winter Tyre Test Auto Zeitung 2022 225/45 R17 6/8 16 metrics
2021 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test Auto Bild 2021 205/55 R16 16/22 15 metrics
2021 ADAC 17 Inch Winter Tyre Test ADAC 2021 225/50 R17 11/18 0 metrics
2021 Winter Tyre Market Overview Auto Bild 2021 205/55 R16 18/49 2 metrics
2020 Auto Zeitung Winter Tyre Test Auto Zeitung 2020 205/55 R16 10/14 11 metrics
2020 ACE Winter Tyre Test ACE 2020 225/50 R17 6/9 0 metrics
2020 Auto Bild Performance Winter Tyre Test Auto Bild 2020 245/45 R18 11/21 12 metrics
2020 Winter Tyre Market Overview - 52 Tyre Braking Test Auto Bild 2020 245/45 R18 18/49 2 metrics
2019 Auto Center Winter Tyre Test AutoCentrum 2019 205/55 R16 4/10 12 metrics
2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tyre Test Auto Bild 2019 225/45 R17 12/21 12 metrics
2019 Winter Tyre Test Market Overview Auto Bild 2019 225/45 R17 18/47 2 metrics
2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test Auto Bild 2018 195/65 R15 4/22 12 metrics
2018 ADAC Winter Tyre Test - 205/55 R16 ADAC 2018 205/55 R16 7/16 0 metrics
2018 51 Winter Tyre Shootout Auto Bild 2018 195/65 R15 2/52 0 metrics
2017 50 Winter Tyre Shoot Out Auto Bild 2017 225/50 R17 14/45 0 metrics
2017 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test Auto Bild 2017 225/50 R17 7/21 11 metrics
2017 ADAC SUV Winter Tyre Test - 215/65 R16 ADAC 2017 215/65 R16 9/16 0 metrics
2017 AMS Performance 18 inch Winter Tyre Test Auto Motor Und Sport 2017 225/40 R18 5/10 9 metrics
27
Tests
12th
Average
2nd
Best
23rd
Worst
Latest Tyre Test Results
18th/52
18th/22
The Fulda Kristall Control HP 2, as another Continental budget brand alongside Barum, demonstrates respectable dry road performance with decent handling characteristics that feel more car-like than many winter tyres. However, this dry-biased behavior creates an unbalanced package with particular weaknesses on wet roads, where performance across handling, braking, and aquaplaning resistance falls short of acceptable standards for safe winter driving. The snow performance is adequate but unremarkable. At approximately €440 per set, it sits in a challenging price position—more expensive than the better-balanced Barum sibling but lacking the performance to justify the premium over that proven budget option. The tyre struggles to find a clear identity or target customer, as drivers seeking dry performance would choose sportier options while those prioritizing winter safety would select better wet and snow performers. It represents a compromise that doesn't particularly excel at anything.
2025 ADAC Winter Tyre Test
225/40 R18 • 2025
13th/31
The Fulda Kristall Control HP2 fails to achieve good ratings on dry and wet roads and therefore misses a good driving safety score, and despite earning a good environmental rating, this isn't sufficient to improve the overall judgment to "good." For driving safety, the tyre shows weaknesses in precision and steering feedback on dry roads, lacking the accuracy and directness expected during steering input and cornering - frequent steering corrections are needed to maintain the desired path, and during sudden evasive maneuvers the Kristall Control HP2 doesn't convince as the test vehicle tends to oversteer, especially when counter-steering, with sliding phases that could be shorter, resulting in overall limit behavior that isn't at a high level and is rated as adequate, while dry braking distances are also rated as only satisfactory compared to the test field. On wet surfaces, the Fulda also only manages satisfactory ratings - while it narrowly misses good scores for braking distances, its handling behavior is clearly rated as satisfactory due to moderate grip levels and the need to better combine longitudinal and lateral forces, which would positively impact limit behavior and precision, and while its longitudinal aquaplaning behavior is still rated as good, it doesn't achieve good ratings for lateral aquaplaning. In winter conditions, the Kristall Control HP2 just manages to secure good ratings overall, achieving good scores for both snow braking distances and snow traction compared to the test field, but narrowly missing good ratings for ice braking distances and snow handling, where it would need to better combine longitudinal and lateral forces for good scores, offering moderate grip levels and satisfactory limit reserves. Regarding environmental performance, this German-manufactured tyre receives good ratings with good mileage, low tyre wear, and good efficiency thanks to low weight and fuel consumption.

Alternative Tyres

8.4/10
92% 53 reviews
7.6/10
86% 9 reviews
7.4/10
86% 17 reviews
7.0/10
86% 11 reviews
6.8/10
87% 42 reviews
6.5/10
87% 17 reviews
Size Fuel Wet Noise
15 inch
195/55R15 85 H C B 72
195/65R15 91 H C C 72
16 inch
205/60R16 96 H XL B C 72
205/55R16 94 V XL C C 72
205/55R16 91 H C C 72
205/60R16 92 H C B 72
215/60R16 99 H XL C B 72
215/60R16 99 H XL C C 72
17 inch
225/45R17 91 H C C 72
225/45R17 94 V XL C C 72
225/50R17 98 V XL C C 72
225/50R17 98 H XL C C 72
215/55R17 98 V XL C C 72
215/45R17 91 V XL D B 72
225/50R17 94 H D C 71
205/50R17 93 V XL D C 72
18 inch
245/40R18 97 V XL C C 72
225/40R18 92 V XL D C 72
245/45R18 100 V XL D C 72
245/45R18 100 V XL C C 72
View All Sizes and EU Label Scores for the Fulda Kristall Control HP2 >>

Questions and Answers for the Fulda Kristall Control HP2

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Fulda Kristall Control HP2. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Review Summary

Based on 10 user reviews

Drivers of the Fulda Kristall Control HP2 generally report strong wet and snow traction, predictable handling, and good comfort/noise levels, with several noting good value and even low rolling resistance. High-scoring reviews particularly praise its stability and confidence in winter conditions. A minority highlight longer-term issues, citing performance deterioration as the rubber hardens with age and instances of uneven rear wear/cupping that can raise noise. Overall sentiment skews moderately positive with some durability/aging caveats.

Strengths
  • Wet grip
  • Snow traction
  • Predictable handling
  • Steering precision
  • Ride comfort
  • Low noise
  • Value for money
  • Low rolling resistance
Areas for Improvement
  • Performance deterioration with age (rubber hardening
  • Loss of grip)
  • Uneven rear wear/cupping leading to increased noise

Top 3 Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Reviews

Given 78% while driving a Volkswagen Golf R estate (205/50 R17) on a combination of roads for 2,500 spirited miles
I bought these tyres as they were all my local tyre company had in stock - they have turned out to be extremely good, far better than my previous Nokian WR D4 tyres. They are amazingly quiet & seem to offer plenty of grip & low rolling resistance. They're also enjoyable to drive on a twisty road - I was always conscious of having much narrower & higher profile winter tyres before (summer size is 235/35/19, so quite a difference), but with these, it's easy to forget. They're even effective outwith the normal "window" for winter tyres (I drove over 600 miles in 2 days, with the temperature not dropping below 11c).

In short, although these are a "mid range" tyre (& one I wouldn't have bought if I hadn't needed them in a hurry), I wouldn't hesitate to use them again, they have surprised me with how good they are! I haven't experienced proper winter conditions yet (just a few heavy frosts), but impressive so far.
December 14, 2023
Given 34% while driving a (205/55 R16) on for 0 miles
Very poorly wearing tires. I'm a mechanic and I keep seeing these tyres cupping very bad on the rear of many cars, with many customers complaining about noise. On the front they last long, but it seems the compound and the tread pattern have been designed poorly.
April 18, 2024
Given 39% while driving a Opel Astra K 1.4T 150 (205/55 R16 V) on a combination of roads for 4,500 average miles
Yeah, I don´t know really where to start...This is the second season I have these tires and today I am going to get rid of them. These tires are so bad that they are almost dangerous to have on a car. I have had some rubbish tires on my Kia Pride that performed better than these Fulda tires . The tires are fine in the dry, they perform OK, nothing special and they are super comfortable and not noisy, BUT in the wet or on snow, they are dangerous. Very unpredictable, in almost every corner there is understeer, no matter the speed. I have tried to raise and to lower the pressure of tires...Did almost 100KM just testing to see if something would help...I am out of ideas and I have to get rid of them today
January 12, 2021

How would you rate the Fulda Kristall Control HP2?

Click a star to start your review

Latest Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Reviews

Initial Impressions Review
Given 86% while driving a BMW i3 (155/70 R19) on for 7,000 miles
Have been using these tyres on my BMW i3 for the last two winters and have been absolutely delighted with them.

I must stress I would never normally have considered Fulda tyres, however the choice of winter tyres available for the i3 is extremely limited. When I purchased these neither Continental or Michelin had any stock available so given how comparatively cheap these were I decided to give them a go and could replace them if needed.

Genuinely I’ve been amazed how well these have performed. In summer I’ve driven the i3 both on its stock Bridgestone tyres and Michelin e Primacy, these fulda tyres are more than a match for both!

The i3 retained its sharp precise steering feel and the grip in all weathers has been faultless. We predominantly have wet weather throughout the winter and the i3 has hardly troubled the stability control at all even on full throttle starts merging onto main roads. I’ve never had the ABS trigger (other than on ice) whilst fitted, I do frequently brake very strongly to help clear the disc surface of corrosion (caused by the strong use of regen braking by the i3).

This seems to be a contrast to lots of the reviews on here, perhaps the extremely narrow width of the i3 tyres are better suited to the fuldas tread pattern.

I consider myself a fussy tyre purchaser, who is happy to pay extra for the security offered by premium brands, but these Fulda tyres have totally exceeded my expectations. Had I paid the same price of Michelins or Continentals I would still be extremely happy with my purchase, the fact they were over £300 cheaper for a set makes them a genuine bargain. Will definitely purchase them again once the performance starts to deteriorate but at the moment they are as good as the day I bought them.

Well done Fulda.
January 18, 2026
Initial Impressions Review
Given 49% while driving a BMW 520d (225/55 R16) on for 12,600 miles
I would never buy this tyres again , first winter was amazing , 2nd winter was bad, now 3rd winter is worse than summer tires , the rubber got so hard on them and they have no more grip.
January 7, 2026
Initial Impressions Review
Given 61% while driving a Honda Civic 1.5T (215/50 R17) on a combination of roads for 400,000 easy going miles
If the tire is between 0 and 5 years old, I can recommend it. From the 5th year onwards, the tire deteriorated for me.
After approximately 40,000 km and 7 years, 4 mm of tread depth remained (the first indicator on the tire profile was reached), which is a good mileage.
Negative points from the 5th year onwards: loss of grip in wet and icy/snowy conditions; rapidly hardening rubber (despite underground parking); summer tire-like ride (direct steering feedback, harsh impacts, hardly any damping effect from the tires); when going over potholes, the rear axle became unstable, i.e., loss of grip and poor rolling characteristics.
January 2, 2026
Given 90% while driving a BMW 530d F11 (245/45 R18 V) on a combination of roads for 3,500 average miles
Very good grip and driving in wet roads. Very good in poor snow, also in wet snow, but not very good in ice roads for braking and no good grip in ice. Noisy when speed more than 100km/h, but good handling and road feedback.
January 29, 2019
Given 68% while driving a BMW 330i M Sport Coupe (225/45 R17) on mostly town for 700 average miles
Hit a curb today i was unable to stop for around 15 meter with these brand new tires were driving around 40mp/h
January 26, 2019
Given 87% while driving a SEAT 1.4 TSI (225/40 R18) on a combination of roads for 6,000 spirited miles
Bought them because the reviews were good and I they were pretty cheap while still being a tyre made by the Dunlop/Goodyear group.
I'd like to specify that my "reference" as a summer tyre is a Dunlop SportMaxx RT2.
The ride is pretty good, I have 18" rims but the car is pretty comfortable and this doesn't change with these, they may be even better than the summer tyres. Noise levels are good too and the typical noise that winter tyres make (typically when you're slowing down and stopping) is not particularly noticeable.
Handling is really safe, maybe not the most fun but the car is always easy to control and predictable. I had a few times with my summer tyres (when I was really pushing the car) where the car decided to go sideways when the "partially deactivated" ESC decided that he didn't like me making the car widen up the trajectory with the throttle; such a thing never happened with these tyres instead. The front is always going to be the one to give up first. They even saved my ass (helped by the ESC, fully activated fortunately) when I took a damp and greasy, badly designed, new roundabout, too fast; ESC started working like crazy, the car kept it's composure and trajectory and I got out of it effortlessly. (Plenty of people crash on that roundabout since day one, the guardrail is full of dents and scratches).
Grip is really good too, especially while accelerating. Even on damp roads in second gear most of the times the tyres don't spin, and I've got 150PS. I suppose the sipes really do their job.
The best part? Snow and Ice traction. It didn't snow much last year in southern italy so I decided to go find some snow because I wanted to test them. I found a few snow covered roads and it almost didn't even feel like I was driving on snow. I found then a really steep incline inside the city that, since it was in the shade and was really steep, none had dared to drive through; I went up and found out that either I could only go right, which was a dead end, and on the left was a "wrong way". Stupidly, I stopped and suddenly realized that I shouldn't have,"this thing is too steep, I'm gonna get stuck" I though. Oh boy was I wrong; with the help of the electronic differential despite the snow and ice I started going up with minimal wheelspin, made a U turn and went back downhill without even triggering the ABS. That was so satisfying.
Can't comment on wear but didn't seem excessive.
Honestly I can't really find any big fault in them, especially for the price. If you're looking for a safe tyre for the winter they're a good choice, especially if you're gonna drive through lots of snow and ice.
August 25, 2018
Given 89% while driving a BMW 520i (205/60 R16) on for 0 miles
very good tires. Good handling on heavy snow roads.
January 4, 2017
Rate the Fulda Kristall Control HP2