Bridgestone Alenza 001 Reviews - Page 2
Given 47%
while driving a
Honda ZR V SPORT e:HEV
(225/55 R18)
on mostly town
for 10,000 average miles
Very noisy tire
Given 48%
while driving a
Mazda CX9
(255/50 R20)
on a combination of roads
for 650 easy going miles
I replaced the oem falknen ziex on my Mazda CX9 with Bridgestone Alenza s001. I won’t buy them again even though they cost just a third of the price of the Falkens. The Falkens were very comfortable, quiet and had excellent wet and dry grip. I have only done about 1000 km on the Alenzas Road noise is unbearable.They are very bumpy, although that could be because the installer inflated them to 38 psi rather than 33psi as recommended by Mazda. I reduced the pressure to 34 and they seem a little bit better now. Wet grip is poor.
Given 75%
while driving a
Honda ZR V SPORT e:HEV
(225/55 R18)
on mostly motorways
for 0 easy going miles
Very Noisy TIre on My Honda ZRV 2023 - IN UAE
Given 67%
while driving a
Mercedes Benz GLA 250
(235/45 R20)
on mostly country roads
for 27,000 spirited miles
Original equipment. 27,000 km traveled: the front axle needs to be replaced. Pronounced wear on the edges creating the start of a drift on tight bends (dry road). Biggest fault: poor traction - particularly on wet ground - causing systematic skidding when starting off (strong acceleration) despite an automatic transmission and traction control (and size of the rubber) and a huge flat on each front tyre (traction). Disappointing considering the price. I do not recommend it, except for quiet driving of a passenger vehicle.
Given 54%
while driving a
Toyota Kluger (Highlander)
(235/55 R20)
on a combination of roads
for 45,000 easy going miles
Very noissy tyre
Given 94%
while driving a
BMW X3 2.0d Sport
(245/50 R19)
on a combination of roads
for 25,000 average miles
Replaced original Michelins. Quieter, more comfortable and good all round performance. Wear has been good, currently at 3.8mm after 25k mikes.
Given 63%
while driving a
Toyota Corolla Cross
(215/60 R17)
on mostly motorways
for 0 average miles
I am a tire user in Taiwan. This is a Corolla Cross original factory tire. I used it for four years and about 60,000 kilometers before I replaced it.
In the first 20,000 kilometers of use, I feel that the overall use experience is not bad, and there is not much to criticize about the balance in all aspects. However, the experience in the middle and later periods is very poor. First, the noise has increased significantly, and it has reached the original factory level. The technicians were amazed by the situation. Secondly, the rubber of the tires would peel off. This is not an isolated case but a problem faced by many users. I finally chose to replace the tires when the tread depth was about 3mm after 60,000 kilometers, which made me You can feel more secure and confident in the heavy rain in Taiwan’s summer!
I use Google to translate the article, please forgive me!
In the first 20,000 kilometers of use, I feel that the overall use experience is not bad, and there is not much to criticize about the balance in all aspects. However, the experience in the middle and later periods is very poor. First, the noise has increased significantly, and it has reached the original factory level. The technicians were amazed by the situation. Secondly, the rubber of the tires would peel off. This is not an isolated case but a problem faced by many users. I finally chose to replace the tires when the tread depth was about 3mm after 60,000 kilometers, which made me You can feel more secure and confident in the heavy rain in Taiwan’s summer!
I use Google to translate the article, please forgive me!
Given 86%
while driving a
Audi Q3
(235/50 R19)
on mostly motorways
for 22,000 average miles
Alenza 001 tires are well-made, offering good performance in grip and handling, but they are noisy, and seem to wear out quickly
Given 63%
while driving a
Toyota RAV4
(225/45 R17)
on a combination of roads
for 60,000 average miles
Basic tyres which came from the dealer. Lasted 80.000 km easily. Good traction control but very very noisy.
Given 49%
while driving a
Toyota (215/60 R17)
on mostly town
for 12,000 average miles
My car tends to slide outwards due to centrifugal force while using Bridgestone Alenza tyres on curved roads. Compared to Bridgestone Alenza, my Continental Winter Contact 870 winter tyres performed better on the same roads. My Totota Model is not listed on the pop-up menu. It is the Corolla Cross Hybrid Fashion X-Pack.
Given 93%
while driving a
Hyundai ix35
(225/60 R17)
on mostly town
for 5,000 average miles
Have switched to these tyres from Pirelli Cinturato P7 which were very good strong tyres, with the biggest drawback being very stuff compound making the edge piece of rubber to tear off on a gravel road.
Alenza are great touring tyres, being exceptionally quiet on any surface, even gravel. Reminded my of purely Japanese Yokohama Aspec dB I has on my Mazda many years ago.
Tried hard to slip these tyres on a mountain road but was not able to even make them squeak. With G force becoming already well over normal for daily driving, and tyres still standing strong, I can say traction is well over sufficient for most of the drivers.
Wet traction is perfect with almost no braking or steering effect when running into a puddle on highway speeds. Traction on Wet is also great with very nice feedback. Slip does not start by surprise. Tyres give you well enough warning that they reached their lateral traction capabilities for driver to take the foot from the accelerator.
Wear is avarage but I disagree with overall low score as they are still well above avarage wear for even more expensive tyres.
I recommend these for drivers, who like comfort and predictability. These are definitely not sport tyres but are very well performing touring summer tyres.
Alenza are great touring tyres, being exceptionally quiet on any surface, even gravel. Reminded my of purely Japanese Yokohama Aspec dB I has on my Mazda many years ago.
Tried hard to slip these tyres on a mountain road but was not able to even make them squeak. With G force becoming already well over normal for daily driving, and tyres still standing strong, I can say traction is well over sufficient for most of the drivers.
Wet traction is perfect with almost no braking or steering effect when running into a puddle on highway speeds. Traction on Wet is also great with very nice feedback. Slip does not start by surprise. Tyres give you well enough warning that they reached their lateral traction capabilities for driver to take the foot from the accelerator.
Wear is avarage but I disagree with overall low score as they are still well above avarage wear for even more expensive tyres.
I recommend these for drivers, who like comfort and predictability. These are definitely not sport tyres but are very well performing touring summer tyres.
Given 35%
while driving a
Mazda CX 60
(235/50 R20)
on a combination of roads
for 0 average miles
I own a Mazda CX-60 PHEV. Standard it is delivered with Bridgestone Alenza 001 235 50 100W tyres. I think they are very hard and noisy and make the condition of the road very noticeable in the whole car. During a repair of my car the dealer gave me the same (demo) car with Toyo Proxes tyres. A big big difference!! Later a read a review on the cx60 forum with the same subject, I agree to the conclusion; the Bridgestone is a good but not comfortable tyre with a high noise level. Mayby it is the combination with the specific suspension of the car which is also “sporty” but the choice for the tyre makes a big difference in this car.