Menu

Bridgestone Dueler HT 684 Reviews - Page 2

Given 64% while driving a Nissan Arrmada (275/60 R20) on mostly town for 32,000 easy going miles
These tires were fitted from the factory when we purchased our Armada brand new. My wife drives it specifically to commute to work and dropping off and picking up our kiddos from daycare. There is no extreme driving involved. All other aspects of this tire such as dry, wet, snow, and dirt are great, but the wear and durability is by far the worst I've ever experienced with any Bridgestone tire. I've used the potenza s04 pole positions and was very impressed with these on my corvette. Granted its a different car and weight difference, but this particular tire, Dueler HT 684, is a complete waste of money to spend on if you have a choice in tire. You'd expect a 60k mile tire to at least last to 30k miles. These things were done by 32k. All well before the Texas heat. I can only imagine how much quicker they would wear out in a Texas summer. Stay away from these. Dont say I did'nt warn you.
July 7, 2023
Given 51% while driving a Toyota 2006 Avalon (255/70 R18) on a combination of roads for 18 easy going miles
OEM tires on my Tundra W/T. Did not drive the truck a lot for several years because I had a more economical vehicle (Ford Focus). Still, it never sat more than 30-60 days before I put into rotation to keep things moving. I had noticed slight cracking in the sidewall above the rims shortly after purchase, but didn't give it a lot of thought because the dealer never raised it as an issue during my regular service, which included tire inspections.

Following a recent trip to Fairbanks, a fellow commented on the condition of the cracks and also observed cracks in the deep part of the tread. A tire shop up there advised the tread line cracks were more cosmetic, but the sidewall cracks could be catastrophic. She recommended replacement before the end of the year.

Fortune smiled upon me as Costco had a sale on Michelin tires and I got a set of LTX M/S 2 for a decent price. The 3 hour gross time for the change over wasn't great, but I have 'not Bridgestone.' After this experience, I won't recommend Bridgestone tires to anyone.
June 17, 2023
Check out how the BEST all seasons tyres perform against premium summer and winter tyres!
Given 82% while driving a Isuzu DMAX (265/60 R18) on mostly country roads for 40,000 easy going miles
Came fitted on Dmax. Okay on tar wouldn't be confident off road or mud. Towing a 2.5t van and tyres lose grip on wet grass in caravan park!
March 30, 2023
Given 70% while driving a Toyota Revo (265/60 R18) on mostly motorways for 40,000 average miles
Tyre terrain exposure : Paved/Roads (75%), Unpaved/Gravel/Dirt (15%), Rough/Muddy (10%) Tyre average pressure : 200kpa(29psi)-230kpa(33psi) Average Driving Speeds : 50-90km/h (occasional burst of 120km/h on straight roadways averaging 1-2km) Environment : Tropical (Mostly Dry with a couple downpour seasons) Tyre Preliminary Condition : Factory Fitted On paved roads, tyres have short braking drag and there is no feeling of uncontrolled swerving upon hard braking, tyres do not feel heavy on acceleration and have good control when making sudden manoeuvres. Handling control drops on sand/dirt/rain coated roads - light swerving can sometimes be felt but does not compromise overall control of vehicle. Tyres have poor traction on muddy terrain. Tyres are quiet overall. Tyres lasted just short of 40k miles, deepest thread depth was around 3mm.
September 1, 2022
Given 100% while driving a Volkswagen Amarok permanent 4x4 (245/65 R17) on mostly motorways for 110 average miles
These tyres are the greatest so far traveled 110,000 km starting to show wear probably get 120,000 130,000 been all but 10,000 hwy driving will be purchasing them again absolute brilliant for my situation. The 2020 AMAROK CORE is one brilliant Ute.
August 12, 2022
Toyota hilux (265/60 R18 H) on a combination of roads for 7,500 easy going miles
I am using them on my Toyota Hilux and is used 50/50 on bituminous and earthen road. They were fitted by the factory. On dry bituminous road that are ok but on the noisy side. You can also feel that they have a bit of rolling resistance. On wet, they are slippery and you are not always feeling safe on sharp turns. On dry earthen road, they are not good. Slippery with the dust that kills that traction. And they puncture easily. The worst is on wet earthen road, they are DANGEROUS. 0 grip, the car is on skates. Tyre pattern fills up in matter of second and NEVER expulse the trapped mud. I would not recommend and not buy again.
January 13, 2021
Given 61% while driving a Toyota Land Cruiser Utility SWB (245/70 R17 S) on a combination of roads for 22,000 average miles
The tyres were supplier with my 2018 Land Cruiser. I have just had my 3rd puncture in 22,000 miles and will not be sticking with this model of tyre again. For general road/highway driving, they are fine - fairly quiet, enough grip in most conditions and comfortable. Wear seems pretty good also - 5-6mm remaining after 22k miles. Unfortunately I don't think they are made for any off-road work - I do a lot of gravel and flinty farm tracks - simply not tough enough. Considering the tread pattern they are just about acceptable off-road (muddy tracks/fields etc) but nothing more than that.
December 7, 2019
Given 91% while driving a Honda CRV (205/70 R15 T) on a combination of roads for 6,060 spirited miles
I drive a 4x4 SUV both on and off road and have found these tyres the equivalent to their Dueler A/T 001. My only problem is that they appear to be becoming difficult to find!
June 27, 2018

How would you rate the Bridgestone Dueler HT 684?

Click a star to start your review

Rate the Bridgestone Dueler HT 684