Menu
Habilead ComfortMax AS H202 View Gallery (1)

Habilead ComfortMax AS H202

Habilead Tyres Touring All Season

The Habilead ComfortMax AS H202 is a Touring All Season tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

6.7
Tyre Reviews Score Based on User Reviews
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
77%
Wet Grip
69%
Road Feedback
65%
Handling
63%
Wear
74%
Comfort
74%
Buy again
77%
Snow Grip
30%
Ice Grip
20%
7 Reviews
61% Average
107,500 miles driven
Habilead ComfortMax AS H202

Habilead ComfortMax AS H202

All Season Budget
BETA
6.7 / 10
Based on User Reviews · Limited Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 0
Publications: 0
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 7
Avg Rating: 61%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 2.68
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
All Tests

Sorry, we don't currently have any magazine tyre tests for the Habilead ComfortMax AS H202

Questions and Answers for the Habilead ComfortMax AS H202

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Habilead ComfortMax AS H202. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Top 3 Habilead ComfortMax AS H202 Reviews

Given 64% while driving a BMW 318D (225/45 R18) on mostly motorways for 13,000 average miles
After 8000 miles I had to replace the driven tyres as they had wore down to below the minimum I feel like it had something to do with the lack of grip there was in that first set I had causing increased tyre wear, however replaced them two with the same tyres again (out of my own pocket no free replacement even tho I’m convinced they were a faulty tyre) and on the new ones they seem to be doing a little better as I have 5000 miles on them and a fair bit more thread than last time also better grip
Helpful 841
January 16, 2022
Given 71% while driving a Toyota Corolla (175/70 R13) on a combination of roads for 13,500 spirited miles
For budget Tyres, these exceeded expectations. Whiles they were not the most comfortable on uneven pavement, the feedback they provided was acceptable. Dry grip had me all smiles as I was not able to over come their limit while going 100km+ around bends. The level of Wet grip gave a false sensation that the road was dry until you brake hard, but even then, they were still able to grip great under wet and dry braking. For the price and performance I was able to extract while driving 13000+ Miles on these Tyres I wouldn't hesitate to buy again
Helpful 835
May 10, 2021
Given 71% while driving a Mazda cx5 (225/65 R17) on a combination of roads for 30,000 easy going miles
value for money good for city-traffic- highway ok at set speeds but a little caution in wet good wearing
Helpful 789
August 10, 2021

How would you rate the Habilead ComfortMax AS H202?

Click a star to start your review

201 reviews submitted this month Earn your Contributor badge No account needed

Latest Habilead ComfortMax AS H202 Reviews

Given 64% while driving a Peugeot 306 (185/65 R14) on a combination of roads for 10,000 miles
Definitely a really good surprise on dry roads, I've tried to find the limit on corners going very hard, and I've struggled to find it. On wet roads, you have to be more careful, maybe the aquaplaning limit is slightly low, and when braking downhill, depending on the pavement, sometimes my car (no ABS) locks very easily. Going to change to an all-season premium brand soon for peace of mind and snow capabilities just in case. Given its pricepoint and performance, there is no need to ride with more expensive overworn tires, as these tires are not dangerous, at all. TL;DR more than good enough tires to transport you safely. Just a little bit careful on wet, wou won't find the limit on a regular daily driver
Helpful 720
December 2, 2021
Given 60% while driving a Nissan LEAF Tekna (205/55 R16 H) on mostly town for 10,000 average miles
Good tier for the price , do his job well
You have To be careful during turns when you over 80km/h
Perfect for city driving
Used them for 1.5 years
Never change the range that my electric car covered during the charge .
Helpful 812
January 26, 2020
Check out how the BEST all seasons tyres perform against premium summer and winter tyres!
Rate the Habilead ComfortMax AS H202