Menu

Hankook Ventus V2 Concept 2 H457

The Hankook Ventus V2 Concept 2 H457 is a Ultra High Performance Summer tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

6.5
Tyre Reviews Score Based on User Reviews
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
69%
Wet Grip
47%
Road Feedback
55%
Handling
67%
Wear
73%
Comfort
69%
Buy again
42%
11 Reviews
60% Average
137,343 miles driven
Hankook Ventus V2 Concept 2 H457

Hankook Ventus V2 Concept 2 H457

Summer Premium
BETA
6.5 / 10
Based on User Reviews · Limited Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 0
Publications: 0
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 11
Avg Rating: 60.4%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.06
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
All Tests

Sorry, we don't currently have any magazine tyre tests for the Hankook Ventus V2 Concept 2 H457

Questions and Answers for the Hankook Ventus V2 Concept 2 H457

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Hankook Ventus V2 Concept 2 H457. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Top 3 Hankook Ventus V2 Concept 2 H457 Reviews

Given 81% while driving a Lexus SC430 (235/50 R17) on a combination of roads for 45,000 average miles
After much thought and research, through customer feedback, advertisements and testing reviews I chose these tires for their decent ratings, price and size. My car, Lexus SC 430, comes with 245/40-18 tires wearing low profile tires which I didn't find a comfortable combo, especially for a Lexus GT. I decided to purchase a set of used LS430 wheels which share all the specs of the 18s, offset and hub size. The Hankook 235/50-17 Ventus V2 Concept, (26.1 in. dia.) gave me .7 inch more sidewall height, close to the same tread width and only .4-inch larger diameter. Hankook has several 235/50-17s with 26.1-inch diameter which is .2 inches smaller than most 235/50-17 tires, usually 26.3 This combo gave me a smoother, more comfortable, by at least 60%-70%, and quieter ride. I always keep my tire pressure to near spec. 34psi front, 31psi rear and they perform great dry, good wet and good cornering. I don't drive in snow so no comment there. I feel they are much a better wheel and tire than OEMs.
November 4, 2024
Given 53% while driving a Mazda MX5 (205/45 R17) on mostly town for 8,000 average miles
They're pretty good in dry conditions for cheap tires but terrible on wet roads. If the road is any wetter than slightly damp my Mazda mx5 wants to slide all over going above 45mph which is not great in south Florida.
February 24, 2025
Given 51% while driving a Toyota Scion XD (215/55 R16) on a combination of roads for 2,000 spirited miles
Start with the good. They are quiet, comfortable i.e. soft sidewall tires. They seem to be wearing well although only had them for 2k miles. They're cheap. Probably the cheapest name brand tire I could find in my size. They handle ok in the dry for acceleration & braking. Cornering grip is ok as well. Trying to keep this in perspective as my daily has 200TW RS4 tires. Rolling resistance is decent but not great. My Scion is averaging 27mpg mixed highway/city. Would expect something in the 30's without hypermiling. Now the bad. Wet weather traction is terrible. Could be wet or standing water. Car will spin on acceleration even in 2nd & 3rd great & this is in a car with about 80hp. Cornering in the wet is terrible. You have to drive like a granny not to slide. Braking in the wet is the only area oddly enough where it's ok.
November 15, 2022

How would you rate the Hankook Ventus V2 Concept 2 H457?

Click a star to start your review

Latest Hankook Ventus V2 Concept 2 H457 Reviews

Given 63% while driving a Volvo C30 T5 (/50 R17) on a combination of roads for 28 spirited miles
Decent grip dry. Not quite as good in wet. Eh in snow. Good bang for your buck. Tread life could have been better but wasn’t terrible. Sidewalls have noticeable flex. Noisy on grooved pavement. Good for light spirited driving.
June 7, 2022
Given 43% while driving a Subaru BRZ (215/45 R17) on mostly town for 20,000 spirited miles
Tire is pretty cheap and decent grip on the dry, but when its wet, the car will slide all over the road so I have to drive extra gingerly in the wet. Its fun if I want to power slide in the wet due to the car good handling and rear wheel drive, but can give you a fright if you were not expecting that to happen. Starting off the lights on the slope can be troublesome due to lack of grip and the wheel will spin easily. I have Pilot Sport and Good Year Assurance Triple Max on the other car now which is much better tires than this.
February 27, 2022
Given 83% while driving a Peugeot 307 (205/55 R16) on a combination of roads for 100 average miles
Fitted used one for my 307 hatchback, this tyres is miles improvement compared to previous one GT Radial Champiro BXT Pro, super quiet in highway and good handling both wet and dry. Not sure if i want to buy again since other brands such Continental or Michelin might offer better overall performance
February 27, 2022
Given 23% while driving a Toyota Levin (205/40 R17) on a combination of roads for 1,000 spirited miles
Horrible handling for my car which I used to trust in any weather on any corner. Don’t purchase if you enjoy driving fast around corners.
November 3, 2020
Given 67% while driving a Honda DC2 Integra Type R (205/50 R15) on a combination of roads for 30,000 spirited miles
These tires were surprisingly good in the dry, offering good feedback and reassuring grip levels even when pushing it a bit. They are let down a bit in the wet however, Though they are quite predictable even during wet driving. For daily driving, they're pretty smooth and road noise isnt too bad. I was satisfied with their lifespan as well, doing nearly 50,000km and still a few millimetres of tread left. They are a quite well priced tire if you want Something with a bit more performance and feedback but dont want or cannot afford to go the whole hog on RE003s/PS3s etc.
June 3, 2020
Given 54% while driving a Toyota Altis (225/50 R17 V) on a combination of roads for 31,000 average miles
This tyre very hard and not comfortable for me. I think this tyre for use long2 time.
November 22, 2019
Given 56% while driving a Mitsubishi Lancer GT 2.0 (215/50 R17 R) on mostly motorways for 15 spirited miles
Was good initially. However do not take corners in the wet! If u drive a poor handling car u will spin off ur car.

Tried taking a corner at 60kmh and the car almost fishtailed. And that is just a normal drizzle. Imagine under pouring wet condition.

In the dry it is ok. Could do better with grip for sure. Under hard braking the ABS will come out more often than GOODYEAR F1 D5
October 10, 2019
Given 77% while driving a Volkswagen MKVII Bluemotion (225/45 R17 V) on a combination of roads for 200 spirited miles
Bought these tires on a budget as they cost 40% cheaper than the Continental Sports Contact 5 I had previously, that wore out in just 25,000kms. The new V2 Concept 2 had similar grip levels in acceleration and cornering, excellent turn in, slightly soft sidewalls during hard cornering, but is quiet, comfortable and have lower rolling resistance. The only drawbacks are that it doesn't brake as well in the dry and wet as the CSC5, needing a longer distance to come to a complete stop. On the bright side, the treadwear rating is almost double at 500 compared to 280 of the CSC5. It's a great tire for daily driving, especially in the city where there maybe rough or uneven roads, as it dampens the impact and road noise. I haven't pushed it to the limits yet, as I'm still letting the tyres run in, but the CSC5 could take up to 145kph at a bend before losing grip on my 168bhp APR stage 1 Golf MK7. I've only gone up to 100kph on the Hankooks in a bend and 160kph on straights. So far no regrets and I'm confident of its handling at high speeds. Will continue to monitor and give a mid life review in future.
April 24, 2018
Rate the Hankook Ventus V2 Concept 2 H457