Menu
Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 View Gallery (2)
185-285/30-55 R15-20 71 sizes 2016

Yokohama Advan Fleva V701

The Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 is a summer ultra high performance tyre that focuses on everyday drivability with a sporty edge. It earns praise for strong dry grip and braking, a comfortable and relatively quiet ride for the category, and reassuring stability at speed. However, independent testing repeatedly flags wet braking and wet handling as its main limitation, especially when conditions are demanding.

7.2
Tyre Reviews Score Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews
High Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
84%
Wet Grip
79%
Road Feedback
81%
Handling
81%
Wear
77%
Comfort
76%
Buy again
80%
68 Reviews
80% Average
559,485 miles driven
5 Tests (avg: 15th)
Yokohama Advan Fleva V701

Yokohama Advan Fleva V701

Summer Mid-Range
BETA
7.2 / 10
Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews · High Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Comfort
82
0.32x / 2 tests
Dry
79.1
1.8x / 5 tests
Value
60.4
0.42x / 5 tests
Wet
52.2
2x / 6 tests

Cross-category scores are derived metrics that combine data from multiple test disciplines to evaluate real-world performance characteristics.

Braking
68.2
6 tests
Handling
59
4 tests
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 5
Publications: 1
Period: 2017 - 2019
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 68
Avg Rating: 79.8%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.27
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test Auto Bild 2019 225/45 R17 14/20 11 metrics
2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout Auto Bild 2019 225/45 R17 16/45 2 metrics
2018 Auto Review 225/45 R17 Tyre Test 2018 225/45 R17 9/11 0 metrics
2017 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test Auto Bild 2017 225/50 R17 19/20 5 metrics
2017 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Shootout Auto Bild 2017 225/50 R17 15/43 0 metrics
5
Tests
15th
Average
9th
Best
19th
Worst
Latest Tyre Test Results
16th/45
14th/20
Short dry braking, low noise, low fuel use.
Average grip and handling in the wet, high wear.
Conditionally recommended.
9th/11
Size Fuel Wet Noise
15 inch
195/55R15 85 V C A 67
16 inch
205/55R16 91 W C A 67
17 inch
225/45R17 94 W C A 67
215/45R17 91 W C A 67
225/50R17 98 W C A 67
205/50R17 93 W C A 67
215/55R17 94 W C A 67
18 inch
245/40R18 97 W C A 68
225/40R18 92 W C A 67
255/35R18 94 W C A 69
245/45R18 100 W C A 68
19 inch
235/35R19 91 W C A 67
View All Sizes and EU Label Scores for the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 >>

Questions and Answers for the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701

Ask a question
January 23, 2025

The Tyre was updated in 2024? Is it right?

I don't have any data on a recent update, sorry.
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Review Summary

Based on 56 user reviews

Most drivers rate the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 positively, highlighting strong dry grip, confident wet performance for everyday use, predictable handling at the limit, and notably low noise/comfortable ride for a UHP at a good price. Many report stable high-speed behavior and decent wear for spirited driving, though some note softer sidewalls/vague initial turn-in and a drop in sharpness as the tyre ages. A minority report pronounced noise, weaker wet grip when pushed hard or in deep water, and occasional tramlining/instability. Overall, the V701 is viewed as a balanced, value-oriented UHP tyre best suited for spirited street driving rather than ultimate track performance.

Strengths
  • Dry grip
  • Predictable handling/feedback
  • Wet grip (everyday conditions)
  • Comfort/low noise (relative to uhp)
  • High-speed stability
  • Value for money
  • Decent tread wear
Areas for Improvement
  • Soft sidewalls/reduced sharp turn-in
  • Noise for some users
  • Wet grip confidence when pushed hard
  • Aquaplaning in deep water

Top 3 Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 Reviews

Given 76% while driving a Alfa Romeo GT 1.9 JTD (215/45 R17) on mostly country roads for 9,000 spirited miles
Soo i come back, with a tyre review after 15000km. My reviewed might be more negative about handling and more positive about wear as i put them on in October and did most driving while road conditions got worse and worse so less grip less wear keep that in mind. The tyre was great, comfort gets better as the tyres break-in not over bumps but in the corners when you corner really hard at 140kmh they make some vibrating noise witch slowly goes away in few thousand kilometers but not completely, they have about 3mm still left on them its amazing how slowly they wear, and evenly as the manufacturer sayed, my car have a lot of camber specially on the back but the tyres wear completely evely only the outside tyre is very slowly fading away, i run them with 2.80-3bar in them and i have put them front to back at 7000km and i could feel the difference how the rear lost some grip mabey not the grip but the sharpness, some goes now with the front yesterday i tried doing circles and "8" shaped cornes from left to right without any electric control and i did a lot of wear to outside tyres as traction control was not on and on the front i can definitely feel how they lost sharpens Maybe also some grip in the wet, i am angry at myself but those 5minutes were really enjoyable, this tyres are very squealy so the noise is definitely not the limit indicator but they reach and go over the limit very progressively with good feedback you can go over the limit all day and remain comfortable in the tyre, the grip is almost the same in dry and wet maybe not now in the colder temperatures wet road is very slippery many days.. and they deform a lot under extreme load yesterday my friend watching me stopped me after i got a handle of limits because he saved my rims almost touched the floor so yeah this shows the grip is definitely there even in the wet but you can feel is going down with the wear of the tyre. I am recommending this tyres to everyone who drives spiritually, also normally but the comfort factor may make normal drivers choose something else, for the money 108€ with work they are very good but not the best.
March 10, 2024
Given 86% while driving a Ford XH Longreach S Ute (255/40 R17) on a combination of roads for 6,200 spirited miles
i’ve driven these tyres on the rear end of a ford falcon ute, and even with the horrible weight distribution of these falcon utes these tyres perform pretty well, have gone about 210kmh in these wheels and they still felt extremely stable when changing lanes, with grip i’ve been happy too with going on hill runs and twisty roads at an average speed of about 110kmh thru corners on the wet and i’ve pushed these tyres to over 160kmh on some other corners and the rear end still grips well with the factory lsd diff. tyre wear has been alright too (been driving it extremely hard almost daily and haven’t worn out near as much as previous tyres i’ve owned). can’t comment about tyre noise as my cars way to loud haha. oh yeah and i’ve down a few burnouts and skids in these tyres and holy f*** do these things have good wear there’s been times i’ve though ive wrecked the tyres and they still look as if no skids where commited. will buy another pair.
August 23, 2024
Given 70% while driving a Toyota Corolla (195/50 R15) on a combination of roads for 12,500 spirited miles
Fairly competent mid tier performance tyre. Same level of grip in all conditions in my experience. Do note that the sidewalls on these are more flexible than rival tyres (at 36-38psi), which can cause sidewall rollover and squealing when cornering hard. Mildly aggressive alignments will destroy these tires in no time too. Aside from that, perfectly fine for most driving, with the grip to keep you safe when the unexpected happens.
October 31, 2023

How would you rate the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701?

Click a star to start your review

Latest Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 Reviews

Initial Impressions Review
Given 91% while driving a Volkswagen Passat CC (235/45 R17) on for 75,000 miles
Fitted on Passat cc tsi 211 manual, sport chassis, dcc suspension: Purchased with Michelin crossclimate, quickly replaced because knobby tires produced very significant rolling noise, even though they were 70% worn.
I fitted the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 tires because they were very well rated in terms of external noise (67).
They have 75,000 km on them today! They are not quite at the end of their life, which I estimate at 85,000 km!
I'm changing them because I haven't swapped them back and forth a sufficient number of times.
The rear tires have developed notches on the inside; this is a common defect in CCs, due to the rear axle alignment (original) and the very particular braking distribution system (contact on all 4 wheels).
So I'll put the same ones back on, but I'll swap them at each oil change, which is every 10,000 km.
Usage: 50% motorway, 40% departmental road, 10% city.
Normal to spirited driving on small roads...
The most impressive thing is that they maintained their grip throughout their entire life, even on wet roads.
They never surprised me, the drift came very gradually.
\r\nNow aquaplaning on the front at over 110 km/h with very heavy rain, I am at the maximum wear indicators on the front, the rear axle does not move because it is a little less worn.
February 17, 2026
Given 89% while driving a Toyota Celica VVTLi (205/50 R16) on mostly country roads for 3,000 average miles
Excellent tyres for everyday driving and spirited runs as well. Great grip, good in the wet. Initially was noisy, turns out the pressure was too high after install, setting it to recommended pressure 2.3 bars solved the problem.
November 21, 2025
Check out how the BEST all seasons tyres perform against premium summer and winter tyres!
Given 78% while driving a Citroën C2 VTS (195/45 R16) on mostly town for 1,500 spirited miles
I replaced the OEM tires (Michelin Exalto) which are no longer in production) with Yokohama Advan Fleva V701. I could not find Michelin PS3 in stock in the area where I live. I drive the vehicle mostly during the summer months. Haven't had the opportunity to test in the wet. The Fleva have superior comfort and road noise level compared to the Exalto. The stability at high speeds on the highway is excellent, inspires confidence and responds well to steering input. The grip in corners is satisfactory, it builds progressively and gives you enough warning that you are about to lose the car. However, it does not have the ultimate grip that the Exalto had even towards the end of its life. I can not comment on wet grip as I haven't had the opportunity to test the tire in the rain. The tire was not cheap. The price difference from a Michelin PS3 was small. Not sure how it would compare with the PS3. On a plus note, soon after I installed these tires I took the care on a trip in one of the Greek isles, and had to drive the vehicle in some horrible dirt/gravel roads. The tires withstood that unplanned test spectacularly and came out without punctures or damage (had them inspected at the tire shop after the trip). Overall, haven't regret my purchase so far. Will try to give an update in the future on wear.
January 26, 2024
Given 76% while driving a Alfa Romeo GT 1.9 JTD (215/45 R17) on mostly country roads for 1,200 spirited miles
So far i did around 2000km, and the tyres are great, my car is very stiff in general, lowered and have quait some chamber level from the factory, my speeds are usualy from 80kmh to 140kmh on normal roads and 160kmh on highways, so the tyre feels great on dry (first few days thay were very loud) and on the wet thay are also very good a bit too good it gives you the confidence that will get you killed, aquaplaning is non existing u to 120kmh, this tyre is very good all rounder just its not comfortable at all, the bumps were always problematic in my car but with this tyres its even worse witch i dont really mind, thay really lay good on the road as the manufactorer is saying thay are wearing relativly evenly even with my high chamber level, witch means alot to me, to sum it up the tyres are sharp but not comfortable, defenitly buy again.
October 25, 2023
Given 77% while driving a Citroën C2 VTS (195/45 R16) on a combination of roads for 12 spirited miles
Ran these tyres for 3 years/12,000 miles. I'd wager these are probably the best UHP tyres you can get in 195/45/R16 before going into semi-slicks. Very responsive tyre with very minimal sidewall flex at a very good price depending on size. Wear is pretty good for a UHP, and still have 4.5mm left at 12k miles of mostly spirited driving, however the compound does feel aged at this point; much more vibration/bumps felt than when new, and although the grip is still pretty good, it's definitely past it's peak and does feel risky on the limit where it didn't before. Still streetable at this level of wear for average driving styles.

Far superior than the Avon ZV7's fitted before it, though Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance's can perform 98% as well as these Yoko's but noticeably more smoothly.
August 13, 2023
Given 55% while driving a Mazda MX5 MK3 2011 (205/50 R16) on mostly country roads for 1,000 spirited miles
Not very impressed, to be honest. Dry grip on warm summer roads is much lower than I expected, not even comparing favourably to the well-worn Pilot Sport 3's that they replaced. There's a lot of tyre wall movement and they lack the precision that I've gotten used to with the Michelins. On the plus side, they are noticeably quieter and the wet grip is adequate. If you've got an MX5 and enjoy throwing it about occasionally, there are much better choices available.
July 19, 2023
Given 77% while driving a Honda Jazz (195/55 R15) on a combination of roads for 20,000 spirited miles
Dry grip - excellent, barely any tyre squeal ( 195.
Cons - NOISY, significantly noisier after changing to light weight rims.
Would recommend for the performance.
May 23, 2023
Given 53% while driving a Skoda (225/35 R19) on a combination of roads for 3,000 average miles
Very very noisy tyre, lacking on grip too. Feel is nice when pushing on but grip is a real let down.
March 8, 2023
Given 88% while driving a Lexus ISF (265/30 R19) on mostly country roads for 2,000 spirited miles
Not super grip from zero on fbo lexus isf
December 18, 2022
Given 73% while driving a Mercedes Benz C180 Classic Sedan (205/55 R16) on a combination of roads for 15,000 average miles
good tyres but they are making more noise than michelin alplin 6 winter, i can feel every small bump in the road, very uncomfortable
October 24, 2022
Given 80% while driving a Mitsubishi Lancer GT 2.0 (215/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 0 miles
Had these tires for almost 2yrs. Excellent tires for daily. Comfortable but not numb with excellent feedback. Dry grip was great even in wet! Also used it for autocross, thats when I destroyed the outer tread, must be alignment issues but the tires continued to perform the same so I took it to the track again where it did not even show any signs of further wear. Dry grip in the track was good (not excellent) but when it gives, its very predictable and gradual. It didnt even bring me to any sticky situation and continued to perform great after 6 laps. Definitely not great for time attack or racing, but definitely great for a driver who needs an all rounder tire that can do anything good. From highway to mountain roads, these tires will do great.
September 23, 2022
Given 94% while driving a Mercedes Benz 190 2.3 16 (/55 R15) on mostly country roads for 1,000 spirited miles
For the tire size 205/55/R15, choices are very limited in the United States. But it was going to be between this tire and the Vredestein Sprint Plus. So I bit the bullet and bought four of these new Yokohamas. What an amazing tire it has turned out to be. Cornering grip is nothing short of excellent and the shoulders are very rigid, keeping the sidewalls from deforming. The tires do generate more road noise than expected with the windows down, but the car is insulated enough that this is a non-issue if I keep the windows closed. Ride comfort is also great, better than even the 60-section all-seasons I have on my daily. And it's wearing well within the first thousand miles. In the few times I have driven in the rain, the tires maintained pretty much the same grip as in the dry. But the best part is the combination of all those attributes coming with a great price. I'm definitely ordering another set of Yokohama tires when the time comes to replace them.
August 4, 2022
Rate the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701