Menu
Marangoni Mythos View Gallery (1)
215-225/45 R17 2 sizes 2022

Marangoni Mythos

The Marangoni Mythos is a High Performance Summer tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

5.5
Tyre Reviews Score Based on User Reviews
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
69%
Wet Grip
55%
Road Feedback
58%
Handling
60%
Wear
62%
Comfort
58%
Buy again
55%
29 Reviews
59% Average
244,637 miles driven
2 Tests (avg: 11th)
Marangoni Mythos

Marangoni Mythos

Summer Mid-Range
BETA
5.5 / 10
Based on User Reviews · Limited Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 2
Publications: 1
Period: 2012 - 2013
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 29
Avg Rating: 59.5%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.11
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2013 Auto Bild Performance Summer Tyre Test Auto Bild 2013 225/35 R18 5/8 0 metrics
2012 Autobild 50 Tyre Braking Test Auto Bild 2012 225/45 R17 16/45 0 metrics
2
Tests
11th
Average
5th
Best
16th
Worst
Latest Tyre Test Results
Good safety reserves with aquaplaning, short braking distances on dry roads, quiet noise level
Slight understeering driving behavior, increased rolling resistance
16th/45
Size Fuel Wet Noise
17 inch
215/45ZR17 91 W XL D B 70
225/45ZR17 94 W XL D B 70
View All Sizes and EU Label Scores for the Marangoni Mythos >>

Questions and Answers for the Marangoni Mythos

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Marangoni Mythos. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Top 3 Marangoni Mythos Reviews

Given 28% while driving a Honda Jazz (175/65 R14) on a combination of roads for 10,000 spirited miles
very dangerous in wet conditions!! They make a lot of noise! Poor performance in mud
February 23, 2021
Given 43% while driving a Audi 1.8T Quattro (225/45 R17) on mostly country roads for 2,000 spirited miles
Hi, i recently bought and Audi TT with a full set of what look like new Mythos tyres. the first time it rained i happens to go into a corner that i have driver round for about 10 years in various cars (MX5, BMW 325, Mini cooper S) i went totally out of shape!! not what i expected from my Audi Quattro, will be buying a new set of "Bridgestone's" at the end of the month. They're not good in the wet!!!
September 17, 2018
Given 49% while driving a Mercedes Benz (225/45 R17) on mostly motorways for 0 average miles
Very poor grip in the wet back end slides out on sharpish bends
February 8, 2015

How would you rate the Marangoni Mythos?

Click a star to start your review

Latest Marangoni Mythos Reviews

Given 87% while driving a Audi A4 (235/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 0 spirited miles
These really are a very good tyres. Grip on the dry surface is perfect for my experience compared to other brands. Also grip on the wet surface is not bad and I am impressed. I would definitely buy another set of these tyres at any time when required to do so and I will highly recommend to anyone.
September 23, 2014
Given 39% while driving a Mazda MX5 (205/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 4,000 spirited miles
If it's warm and dry these tyres seem ok, however in the wet they are down right dangerous. Even in a modestly powered car, in third gear acceleration can cause the driven wheels to totally lose contact. In the wet my traction control is permanently cutting in.

I would not recommend these tyres despite the acceptable dry performance as they are too much of an issue in the wet. I will be dumping them part worn when I swap back to my winter tyres in a few months.
July 14, 2014
Check out how the BEST all seasons tyres perform against premium summer and winter tyres!
Given 49% while driving a Skoda Octavia vRS (225/40 R18 W) on mostly town for 8,000 spirited miles
These tyres are rubbish,had to replace them due to going out of shape and making an awful noise and they are not even half worn.Have learnt a valuable lesson here,never by cheap tyres they are exactly that!
April 18, 2014
Given 37% while driving a Volkswagen Scirocco 2.0 TSI 210hp (235/40 R18) on mostly country roads for 8,000 average miles
Driven on a 2010 2.0TSI 210bhp Scirocco GT, all four wheel fitted with Mythos'. Front tyres have lasted 8000 miles, I may get another 1000 miles from them but it'll be tight, rear tyres will last 10000. Offers average to good levels of grip in the dry, my nerves go before the car in most occasions. They allow the car to grip in the dry with a small progressive tendency to under steer giving a feeling of confidence. In the wet the story is totally different- cannot put the power down at all spinning the wheels in first and second under normal driving conditions and in third when accelerating hard. Under steer is much much worst in wet conditions and I have no confidence to approach a corner carrying any momentum. Would not buy again. Tyres came fitted by approved VW garage when buying second hand (3 years old with very low miles). Disappointing that the VW garage fits such a poor tyre to a performance car.
February 3, 2014
Given 30% while driving a Ford Mondeo Titanium X (235/45 R18) on mostly town for 8,000 easy going miles
These really are a very poor tyre. Grip in the dry is (just) ok for normal running around town, although the tram-lining is becoming worse as the tyres wear. But as soon as the road becomes damp they become dangerous. It is almost impossible to pull out of a junction without spinning the wheels, even with very low revs and a feather touch on the throttle. Wet cornering and braking inspires no confidence, with a feeling almost like driving on ice. Would definitely not recommend and I'll be changing them very soon, even though they are only half worn - I value my life too much to continue taking this unacceptable risk.
December 7, 2013
Given 10% while driving a Audi A4 2.0 TDI 140 SLine (235/40 R18 W) on a combination of roads for 10,000 average miles
Thought they were good value, how wrong !!
Will change them very soon, thinking Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 !
August 1, 2013
Given 24% while driving a Jaguar XK8 (245/55 R18 W) on a combination of roads for 6,000 average miles
Worst and most dangerous tyres I have ever fitted, and one ruptured it's casing on a very small pothole. In one word? Rubbish
June 29, 2013
Audi A4 3.0 litre TDI S Line Quattro (235/40 R18 W) on a combination of roads for 8,000 spirited miles
Probably the worst tyres I have ever fitted to my car. Poor in terms of wear and handling in the wet was uncertain. Tyres come with a good warranty and are fairly cheap. Wont be buying again.
March 22, 2013
Given 43% while driving a Vauxhall Vectra V6 (225/45 R17) on mostly town for 3,000 average miles
I bought a full set of these tyres for my Vectra 2.6V6 and suffice to say they were good at first but have only lasted 4 months and are worn out. Ive only been driving locally roughly 3000 miles and dont drive to extremes. I,m very disappointed with the quality of these tyres. I,m now looking at an all season tyre as they have a better lifespan.
February 15, 2013
Given 77% while driving a Ford Mondeo Titanium X (235/40 R18) on mostly motorways for 8,000 easy going miles
Decent tyres, very good value for money and including a puncture warranty. Can't go wrong at less than £100 fitted for a 235 40 18 tyre. Decent grip wet and dry and lasting quite well.. Possibly go for the Barum Bravuris 2 next for comparison, but these are a little more expensive at £110 fitted and don't have a puncture warranty.
February 3, 2013
Given 81% while driving a Honda Accord iVtec Type S saloon (225/45 R17 W) on a combination of roads for 18,000 spirited miles
Medium range price for premium quality/performance/wear. Never achieved 18000 miles from a set of four tyres on any car before so very pleased with this mileage on a full set of Marangoni Mythos over 20 months. Just renewed 4 of these with fronts just at the wear blocks an rears down to 2.5mm, having rotated front to rear at 12000 miles. I debated spending more for other premium brands but the clincher was the lifetime free puncture repair, valve and balance, plus damage replacement guarantee........ this kind of confidence speaks volumes and I have to say is backed up now by my own experience of nearly two years driving on a full set. I`ve had premium tyres go out of shape so to my mind the guarantee just demonstrates the quality. Am not a nutty driver caring to comment on driving at the limit.... race driving is for race tracks but I`m also not a Sunday driver and like to get where I'm going without wasting time...... these tyres have been fine under `enjoyable spirited`driving... hope this is helpful.
January 8, 2013
Given 81% while driving a Mercedes Benz E320 CDI (235/45 R17 W) on mostly country roads for 38,000 spirited miles
110,000 miles of motoring in this car and I highly recommend the Marangonis. After finding the original Michelin Primacy HP's dissapointing in terms of grip, I went through, 2 sets of Bridgestone Potenza's and 6 sets of Goodyear Eagle F1's on my 280hp E Class Merc. I am an enthusiastic driver and enjoyed the grip from them. The car has a lot of torque and with the power only going through the back wheels and me enjoying the car, the last 2 rear sets of Goodyear's lasted 6k and 8k respectively. After hitting harder times I fitted the Marangoni's purely because I couldn't afford the Goodyear tyres. However, after 4 sets of 4 I am very impressed. The grip, accuracy and feedback is as good if not slightly better than than the Goodyears IN THE DRY and they wear around 40% better than the Goodyears(about 12k from the rears when driving like I stole it and then 26k for slightly less enthusiastic driving).

The only thing is that the wet grip is probably 20% less than the Goodyear's but I am not suggesting for one second it is anything other than good (but there isn't a tyre that can touch the Goodyears in the wet). As for snow... forget it, like all the rest, they are a performance summer tyre so you shouldn't expect it.
January 8, 2013
Rate the Marangoni Mythos