Menu
Hankook K425 Kinergy Eco View Gallery (1)
155-215/50-70 R13-16 48 sizes

Hankook K425 Kinergy Eco

The Hankook K425 Kinergy Eco is a Touring Summer tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

6.3
Tyre Reviews Score Based on User Reviews
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
83%
Wet Grip
77%
Road Feedback
77%
Handling
74%
Wear
72%
Comfort
77%
Buy again
67%
49 Reviews
75% Average
780,364 miles driven
15 Tests (avg: 7th)
Hankook K425 Kinergy Eco

Hankook K425 Kinergy Eco

Summer Premium
BETA
6.3 / 10
Based on User Reviews · Limited Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 15
Publications: 3
Period: 2011 - 2016
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 49
Avg Rating: 75.3%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.09
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2016 ADAC Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 ADAC 2016 185/65 R15 5/16 0 metrics
2016 ACE Mid Range Summer Tyre Test ACE 2016 195/65 R15 2/10 0 metrics
2015 Auto Bild Top 18 Summer Tyre Test Auto Bild 2015 185/60 R15 2/18 0 metrics
2015 Market Overview - Braking Test Auto Bild 2015 185/60 R15 5/52 0 metrics
2015 European Tyre Test 185/60R14 ADAC 2015 185/60 R14 6/16 0 metrics
2015 European Tyre Test 205/55 R16 ADAC 2015 205/55 R16 16/19 0 metrics
2014 ADAC 175/65 R14 Summer Tyre Test ADAC 2014 175/65 R14 2/16 0 metrics
2014 ADAC 195/65 R15 Summer Tyre Test ADAC 2014 195/65 R15 3/17 0 metrics
2013 54 Tyre Braking Test 2013 195/65 R15 7/54 0 metrics
2013 European Summer Touring Tyre Test ADAC 2013 185/60 R15 12/19 0 metrics
2013 ACE Summer Touring Tyre Test ACE 2013 195/65 R15 6/16 0 metrics
2012 European Summer Tyre Test - 165/70 R14 ADAC 2012 165/70 R14 10/15 0 metrics
2012 European Summer Tyre Test - 205/55 R16 ADAC 2012 205/55 R16 10/14 0 metrics
2012 ACE Touring Summer Tyre Test ACE 2012 205/55 R16 6/14 0 metrics
2011 European Summer Tyre Test - 195/65 R15 ADAC 2011 195/65 r15 11/14 0 metrics
15
Tests
7th
Average
2nd
Best
16th
Worst
Latest Tyre Test Results
2nd/10
5th/16
Very balanced, particularly good in the dry
None mentioned
16th/19
Top marks in fuel consumption and noise
Weak in the wet, high wear
Size Fuel Wet Noise
14 inch
175/65R14 82 T B C 65
165/70R14 81 T B C 64
165/70R14 81 T D D 69
165/70R14 81 T D B 69
175/65R14 82 T D B 69
15 inch
195/65R15 95 H XL A B 72
195/65R15 95 H XL A A 71
195/65R15 91 T B B 69
195/65R15 91 H B B 69
185/65R15 88 T C B 69
195/55R15 85 H C B 69
195/65R15 91 H C D 70
185/65R15 88 T C B 69
195/65R15 91 H C C 71
195/55R15 85 H C B 69
195/65R15 91 H C C 71
185/65R15 88 H C C 70
195/65R15 91 T D C 71
16 inch
205/55R16 91 H C C 71
205/60R16 92 H B B 71
205/55R16 94 H XL B B 71
205/60R16 92 H B B 71
205/55R16 91 V C A 70
205/60R16 92 V C C 70
205/55R16 91 H C D 71
205/55R16 91 V C A 70
205/55R16 91 V C A 70
205/60R16 92 V C C 71
215/60R16 95 V C A 70
205/60R16 92 H C C 71
View All Sizes and EU Label Scores for the Hankook K425 Kinergy Eco >>

Questions and Answers for the Hankook K425 Kinergy Eco

Ask a question
May 19, 2017

Hi, I see that there are 3 versions listed for the size 195/65 R15 91T, each with a different weight. How come? Thanks a lot.

Different speed and load ratings, plus different manufacturing plants can result in different tyre weights.
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Size Price Range  
195/65 R15 £86.99 - £86.99 (1 Price) Compare Prices >>
Available in 5 tyre sizes - View all.

Top 3 Hankook K425 Kinergy Eco Reviews

Given 50% while driving a Hyundai elantra (195/65 R15) on mostly motorways for 0 spirited miles
I had Hyundai Elantra 2020 I just fitted those tyres today , i had continental cc6 before Once i drove my car with the new ones on the start with slow speed i was amazed with its quietness and ease of handling but as i left the city and drove on the highway and just approached just above 60 miles the sound of the tyres was very annoying It was a frustrating experience to me since i look for a quiet smooth and fast ride but with those horrible tyres it is just like a nightmare to me a loud rigid knocking like sound I'm not sure what to do next But i never ever buy hankook tyres again
September 26, 2022
Given 43% while driving a Toyota Corolla AE101 (175/65 R14) on a combination of roads for 10,000 average miles
car drove like a boat and was not fun to drive. uncomfortable and not as quiet as advertised (reason i buy the tire) handling and cornering is sloppy and slippery when wet. price was ok (about€50 per tire) but for the same money you can buy better ones.
July 14, 2022
Hyundai (205/55 R16) on a combination of roads for 50,000 spirited miles
These are the tyres that came with the car when new. I have since purchased a new set after 80.000 kms (50k miles). Tires perform quite well, good amounts of grip on both dry and wet surfaces and they last a lot (upon replacement after 80k kms, they still had roughly half the tread) The car feels stable even at high speeds. The only thing I'm not crazy about is that these tires are noisier than others I've used on similar cars. The car itself has pretty decent sound isolation so it's not a big deal, but you can still hear them a lot when over 130-140 km/H
August 9, 2021

How would you rate the Hankook K425 Kinergy Eco?

Click a star to start your review

Latest Hankook K425 Kinergy Eco Reviews

Given 88% while driving a Citroën c2 (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 2,000 spirited miles
Tyres seem best I've had grip good no problems. I drive hard and gently. Best tyres i've had
April 24, 2020
Given 94% while driving a Hyundai elantra (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 31,000 average miles
Hankook Kinergy Eco was a good overall tyre. I have use these tyres for about 6 years. I've changed them this week due to the age, not because of wear problems. The wear of the tyre it was really good. The sidewall was pretty strong, and the dry handling was good. To be noticed that the tyre it's not made for fast driving, but in the corners the car using these tyres was really stable. The speed coefficient it's H, and I was able to test the tyres at 210 kph. No vibration, the car was really stable at that speed also. From what I know, now it's available a new generation on the market, Kinergy Eco 2. I do not know much about this new gen, but the first gen I can really recommend, especially if you do a lot of miles.
March 14, 2020
Given 76% while driving a Suzuki Swift (165/70 R14 T) on a combination of roads for 6,820 average miles
In my opinion, a very good tire. It adheres very well on dry road surfaces and is very quiet. My car's fuel consumption is also very favorable to it. Compared to your knowledge, the price is good! The only drawback is that you lose a bit of grip on wet roads!
March 31, 2019
Given 53% while driving a MINI Cooper (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 1,500 spirited miles
Not wanting the poor ride quality of run-flat tyres when ordering a new Mini I specified the smallest 16inch wheels as they came with high profile conventional tyres.
What I did not know was that the tyres would be eco tyres. Oh dear the Hankook Kinergy Eco tyres are like concrete. Similar in feel to run-flats.
Please be aware that nearly all the tests are from German magazines and they seem to accept a restless uncomfortable ride on anything other than autobahns.
I would never buy or recommend these tyres if you are interested in ride comfort. On most British A and B roads I consider them unfit for purpose..
May 8, 2018
Given 66% while driving a Kia Motors ceed (205/55 R16 H) on a combination of roads for 21,000 average miles
Until 2 years ago, I'd only owned fast petrol hatchbacks. To save on running costs I switched to a diesel estate; so my view on noise may be unfounded.
I am writing this after having driven on Hankook Kinergy Eco K425s for nearly 2 years and over 20,000 miles.

For the daily grind, which in my case involves motorway & v slow city traffic these tyres have been fine.
Wet grip is good, I've not had any aquaplaning.
Dry grip is good, I've not felt the car loose traction
Braking is v.good, in the few emergency stops I've had to make, the car has stopped quickly without skidding.
Snow/Ice grip is average. I could feel the car slipping when driving through the back roads, but always had enough traction to keep moving.
Road noise is poor, especially at motorway speeds. Not so bad that I wanted to change the tyres, just noisier than tyres I'd been used to.

I'm just changing the tyres now, after 2 years of use they are down to between 2.6mm & 3mm. I know you can legally drive to 1.6mm but it's also common knowledge that wet stopping distance suffers a lot, well before then.

Overall not a bad tyre for the price if your car blocks out external noise.
March 16, 2018
Given 41% while driving a (195/65 R17) on a combination of roads for 1,000 average miles
These are the worst tyres I have ever had in my whole life and I have been driving for decades. I googled the reviews on these before buying them. However, nobody mentioned the noise level ! And they are not cheap tyres either. I cannot bear the noise inside the car since I got these tyres. Everybody is asking me what happened my car - the noise is horrific in the cabin - particularly at speed on the open road. You have to shout at each other just to talk. The noise is so unbearable that I am considering replacing the tyres with a known brand, even though these tyres are new and only have 1000 done on them. Also, even though they are new, the noise is progressively getting worse. Regarding other aspects, they are fine, but my driving is a misery since I got them. All in all, I think nobody should buy these tyres and this is the first time I have ever reviewed anything. But be warned. Only a deaf person could be happy with these tyres.
February 8, 2018
Peugeot 207 1.4 16v (185/65 R15) on a combination of roads for 4,000 spirited miles
Good tires with no obvious weaknesses. For this price, great value, more than good. With normal driving and a bit agressive, no issues on dry and wet. Recommended for 15”.
December 5, 2017
Given 74% while driving a Fiat 1.2 16V (165/70 R14 T) on a combination of roads for 10,000 easy going miles
Suprisingly good on dry, excelent on wet. Producing terrible noise in cabin. For 24 years driving experience never heard so noisy tires (Except maybe winter Debica Frigo)
Driving on this tires is beautiful experience but only when radio is set to loud.
October 21, 2017
Given 93% while driving a Volkswagen Passat 1.9Tdi (185/65 R14 T) on a combination of roads for 27,000 miles
This is a second set of Hankooks for me. First one was Optimo K715, which are good tires, too, but for me, K425 Kinergy Eco are awesome! If you are normal, enjoy-driving rider, this is tire for you! Comparing the price, performances and lasting, Ecos are out of competition, an absolute champions in their category!
October 15, 2017
Given 88% while driving a Honda Accord (195/60 R14 H) on mostly town for 300 spirited miles
I have fitted these to replace Michelin Energy E3A as well as Energy Saver+ (I had two sets of wheels).

K425s are very comfortable tyres. Their shock absorption is slightly better than both Michelins and vibration when driving has been reduced quite a bit. Rebound after passing the gap is managed really well, not like pogo stick and they settle quickly. Noise is very quiet compare to Michelins, too. I can hear them slightly however, they are similar to air noise when driving and not annoying at all. Even on rough tarmac surfaces, the noise level doesn't go up or change much, which is rather impressive. Comfort wise, I feel as if my car had a upgrade to more expensive saloon.

At low to mid speed range, initial turn in response is not as sharp as Michelins, or I could say mild, not like those more sporty tyres such as BS Potenza. However, once the car starts turning with adequate roll, K425s hold very well and are stable throughout the corner. Also it is easy to keep the line I aim at than Michelins. At motorway speed, K425 are easy to keep the straight line however, I feel Michelins are slightly better. On the high speed corner, K425s are excellent, similar to at lower speed as above, and I felt confident jumping into the bends.

In the wet, I haven't had much chance to push K425 but I didn't feel any uneasiness so far. As a trial, I intentionally drove only one side of tyres into large puddles on the road several times but there were no disturbance to the steering wheel, which is very different from Michelins.

Most impressive aspect of K425s is their low rolling resistance, in my case. In several occasions, when I am following the car in front with throttle off, I need to use brakes as my car keeps on going without losing the momentum than other cars in the traffic. It is evident when I am driving down hill, even if it is very slight, I could close the throttle and my car keeps on gliding. As expected, the mpg went up about 10%. This is partially because E3A has relatively high rolling resistance however, it is great news to me.

Overall, K425s are very comfortable tyres and I highly recommend considering the cheaper price than those top brand tyres - as the moment I don't feel any reason to pay more to by Michelin or Continentals. Its response when turning in is not as good as more sporty tyres however, for family car users these are safe and comfortable option.
July 31, 2017
Given 84% while driving a Ford Fiesta (175/65 R14) on mostly country roads for 10,000 spirited miles
Very pleased with these tyres. I mostly drive on twisty country roads and I really push hard on them and have yet to find the edge of grip. Car is lowered on coilovers and for this size wheel i cant get better tyres! I have no tread left after this time but these lasted a couple months longer than other tyres with my driving style. Pushed them on a little in the wet the other day and although nearly bald they kept me safe. The only downside in my opinion is the flowers on the sidewall.
June 27, 2017
Given 93% while driving a Toyota 2006 Avalon (165/70 R14 T) on a combination of roads for 100 average miles
cheaper than michelin and bridgestone but performs when new as good a michelin and better than bridgestone.
price is more competitive than the 2 above mentioned.generally very happy with hankook this being 2nd model i buy after v12 evo 2. will not give my money to the big names anymore since the price they make you pay does not correspond to the durability of the tire.
April 6, 2017
Rate the Hankook K425 Kinergy Eco