Nankang Noble Sport NS20 Reviews - Page 3

Given 36% while driving a Holden 2007 VZ Acclaim wagon (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 5,000 average miles
Understeer understeer understeer
Helpful 13 - tyre reviewed on October 31, 2014
Given 73% while driving a Saab Automobile 9 3 Turbo X 280bhp XWD (245/40 R19 W) on a combination of roads for 2,000 spirited miles
First, let me clarify i bought the NS20 II; the second attempt by Nankang on this tire line.

I am surprised and happy with mine for the price. They are not as bad as the reviews i read. Maybe this is related to different versions?

My stock tire size is 235 45 18. I wanted to try out some cheap 19s. For z rated, i couldn't find much cheaper without going to brands i had never heard of. The ride quality is better than i imagined it would be. The same can be said for both dry and wet traction. It's too early to report on tread wear. The tires look better than many cheap brands and have much better sidewalls.

For the money, this is not that bad of a tire.

Helpful 15 - tyre reviewed on March 25, 2014
Given 35% while driving a Ford Falcon G6E (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 10,000 spirited miles
Cheap tyres and cheap performance, massive understeer to the point of being dangerous and outright noisy.
I just have no confidence in them, wet weather performance is a death wish.
Helpful 15 - tyre reviewed on January 5, 2014
What to know the BEST All Season Tyres for 2024? Click to find out!
Given 99% while driving a Mitsubishi Adventure (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 20 average miles
I like this tire very much..
Helpful 12 - tyre reviewed on October 13, 2013
Given 89% while driving a BMW 135i (245/35 R18 W) on a combination of roads for 17,500 average miles
I bought these for my 1 series, after being quoted ridiculous money for the bridgestone run flat which came off the car, and also not being happy with the harsh ride of the run flats. My local garage recommended a none run flat and the Nankang seemed the best option. I was slightly cautious as I had not heard a great deal about the NS-20 pattern, however I cannot fault them. I have recommended these to friends on my local BMW forum, and they have also agreed. Very good tyre for the money. I will be using again!

Helpful 10 - tyre reviewed on December 7, 2012
Given 61% while driving a Ford Mustang (245/45 R17 H) on mostly town for 800 average miles
For a daily driver to and from work, store or general town driving in both wet and conditions it's A ok tire but if you want performance in fast turns or putting down the hammer this is not the tire.
Helpful 246 - tyre reviewed on November 13, 2012
Given 46% while driving a Volvo S60 2.5T (225/45 R17 V) on mostly motorways for 1,200 average miles
As I visited this forum before I took a chance and bought Nankang - quick feedback after 2000 km.

It understeers like mad and when I tried some "advanced" manouvers the rear tires felt like driving on 155/80/17.

I have increased preasure in my tires (3 kg cold tires) but it does not help.

After talking to experts I now understand my choice of "V"-tires (270km/h) was stupid. They are much "softer" than W or Y. The speed-limit is merely a product of how well built the tyre is, and affects the performance at all speeds.

Not knowing how well the W or Y edition would have performed I still have doubts. Value for the money - no way!

/Jörgen (from Sweden)
Helpful 10 - tyre reviewed on July 8, 2011
Given 46% while driving a Ford Focus MK1 (205/40 R17 W) on a combination of roads for 7,000 spirited miles
These came on my new alloys and at first they didnt grip at all but this is usuall down to the moulding deposits left, after 2000 miles the tyres were stillthe same, throw the car into a roundabout at 30mph and understeer. No matter what i tried to do they would understeer massivly, even going round roundabouts at 15 or 10 it felt like the car would roll onto the sidewall and be on a think layer of ice. i DONT recommend these tyres at all.
Helpful 11 - tyre reviewed on February 20, 2009