225/75 R16 Tyres

The following tyres have been reviewed in 225/75 R16.

Review Your Tyres >>

Tyre Reviewed Dry Grip Wet Grip Feedback Handling Wear Comfort
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate (11) 98% 97% 90% 83% 94% 92%
Matador MP 92 Sibir Snow (7) 77% 81% 81% 77% 88% 92%
Hankook Dynapro HT (3) 77% 83% 60% 70% 70% 87%
Continental Cross Contact AT (14) 81% 70% 83% 73% 79% 75%
Firestone Destination AT (2) 75% 65% 30% 60% 80% 75%
Bridgestone B250 (48) 66% 55% 61% 62% 70% 64%
Hifly HT601 (5) 74% 60% 58% 52% 52% 56%
Bridgestone Supercat (21) 63% 37% 48% 52% 70% 65%
Hifly Super2000 (12) 66% 48% 43% 46% 52% 41%

225/75 16 Tyre Review Highlights

Hifly Super2000 rated 40% while driving a Mitsubishi triton
Driving on mostly country roads for 25000 miles
25000 and there bald as my head. You get what you pay for. Never again
tyre reviewed on 2024-10-29 02:22:05
Bridgestone Supercat rated 79% while driving a Holden 2012 V6 Rodeo ute Petrol rear wheel drive
Driving on a combination of roads for 70000 spirited miles
3rd set supercats. 70000 kms last set. Rear wheel drive 15 year old Rodeo ute. Both on and off Queensland atrocious roads. Recommended.
tyre reviewed on 2024-04-07 02:03:10
Hankook Dynapro HT rated 66% while driving a Toyota Landcruiser
Driving on track for 0 easy going miles
Not used on snow or ice but in the pilbara we are getting side wall failures on a weekly basis. no good on mine conditions,
tyre reviewed on 2021-12-06 02:03:18
Firestone Destination AT rated 60% while driving a Mitsubishi triton
Driving on mostly town for 0 easy going miles
No comments left
tyre reviewed on 2021-05-31 20:20:36
Hifly Super2000 rated 40% while driving a Fiat ducato van
Driving on mostly motorways for 10 average miles
Cheap fitted by RV dealer as he promised to fit new tyres. Never trusted them from the start. Fitted to Fiat Ducato Winnebago front tyres almost worn out after 14,000kms. Rear tyre blew at 105kms/hr without any warning.
tyre reviewed on 2020-10-28 22:38:40
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate rated 100% while driving a Citroën New Relay
Driving on a combination of roads for 300 average miles
These tyres were recently bought for our Citroen New Relay L4H2 van and have transformed the wet and dry grip. No snow yet but having previous experience of the CrossClimate SUV tyre on a private car, which are every bit as good as a full winter tyre in the snow , I do not doubt Michelin’s claims.
tyre reviewed on 2018-10-07 08:35:32
Hifly HT601 rated 84% while driving a Ford 350 box truck
Driving on mostly motorways for 0 average miles
nice tire for the price . i had a set of michelins on my truck wore out after 25,000 mi. piece of crap for the money they charge. hi fly just as good if not better.half the price
tyre reviewed on 2015-01-13 16:29:50
Continental Cross Contact AT rated 48% while driving a Land Rover Defender
Driving on mostly country roads for 0 average miles
These are the summer tyres on my Defender and are acceptable. In winter I have BFG A/Ts which are quieter and have better grip/traction on snow and ice. Neither tyres have worn much, but when the Contis wear out I'll replace them with a quieter "summer" tyre. It's a Defender so I have not exploredred progressiveness or dry grip!!
tyre reviewed on 2014-09-04 07:39:49
Bridgestone B250 rated 64% while driving a Kia Motors Unknown
Driving on a combination of roads for 19 average miles
We're on our second set of these on our Kia Sedona. The original set lasted around 12,000 miles which isn't great even considering the weight of the car.

They're sort of a jack of all trades but a master of none; they just do their job in all conditions. Grip on snow/ice is notably better than a dedicated summer tyre but the wet performance is probably their real weak point. Dry grip is good but I'd be worried of Bridgestone couldn't make a tyre that performed well in the dry.

Road noise/comfort seem ok, no complaints really. Like I said earlier, they just seem to do their job really.

Because of the odd tyre size, these are the only tyres readily available at most places. There's a lot of 4x4 tyres in this size which would be pointless on a Sedona. I'd like to try other tyres but it just seems like a lot of hassle to be able to!

Would I buy again? I think I have to...
tyre reviewed on 2014-01-19 03:15:08
Matador MP 92 Sibir Snow rated 80% while driving a Nissan X trail 2.5 LPG
Driving on mostly country roads for 300 spirited miles
Don`t know yet about wear, but on the black or white ice (compressed snow) and standard ice, tyre works good - 8/10 at braking. Same in the snow.
Torque and accelaration on the ice or compacted snow also very good.
Even with 2-wd it is about 8 from 10.

A bit less good is cornering on ice. Car tends to slip traight instead of turning.

In the mud tyre does not perform as well as Debica Frigo 2 - this was REALLY good tyre in all kinds of snow and ice and also in MUD.
If we compare with this tyre, Debica could fly as fast as 60 kph during slip track turn, while MP92 flew off the same track already at 30 kph...

But overall pretty satisfied with MP92 for winter conditions.

Waiting for lake ice to test in at full performance 4x4
tyre reviewed on 2012-12-01 12:04:13
Use this tyre size? Why not add your own tyre review and help other owners pick the right tyre