Bridgestone Turanza ER300 Reviews - Page 8

Given 84% while driving a Fiat Grande Punto 1.3Multijet 75bhp (195/55 R16 V) on mostly motorways for 28,000 average miles
OEM fitment to a FIAT PUNTO EVO ELEGANZA DIESEL. 28,000 MILES FROM THE FRONT AND 35,000 FROM THE REAR, 80% Motorway use. I have stuck with Bridgestones as the price/wear/grip/comfort/noise characteristics suit the car well.
Have same tyres fitted to SEAT and a Renault, with no complaints.
Helpful 10 - tyre reviewed on October 12, 2012
Given 84% while driving a Ford Fiesta (195/50 R15 V) on a combination of roads for 25,000 spirited miles
Great summer Tyre but falls short with poor performance in the snow with little or no grip which you would expect from a summer compound rubber.
Ran a new set of 4 for a year doing about 15000 on them before replacing the front ones when winter came along continuing to run the back ones for another 10000 before having to replace due to a puncture with still 3mm of tread left on it so on the back of car they last for around 25000+ which is good going.
Helpful 10 - tyre reviewed on October 1, 2012
Given 66% while driving a Skoda Octavia (205/55 R16 H) on a combination of roads for 32,000 average miles
Had these tyres come with the car at purchase. Not a mind-blowing (or mind-numbing) set of tyres, that did the job acceptably. In Australia we have very coarse bitumen (asphalt) and the tyre noise was significant compared to 2 other brands we drove on demo cars (also octavias). As wear progressed the wet grip dropped off significantly and the ESC light became more frequent. Rotating regularly has evened out the wear - fronts taking the bigger hit with the diesel out the front. Now time for new tyres and looking for an alternative brand with better wear and noise while keeping the same level of grip these had when new. Not a sporting tyre, but not a bad option - just looking for something better.
Helpful 9 - tyre reviewed on September 25, 2012
What to know the BEST All Season Tyres for 2024? Click to find out!
Given 36% while driving a SEAT LEON 1.6 105 bhp (205/55 R16 V) on a combination of roads for 15,000 average miles
Average in the dry.
POOR on the wet.
Fast wearing.
Helpful 9 - tyre reviewed on September 17, 2012
Given 96% while driving a Skoda Octavia (205/55 R16 W) on mostly country roads for 75 average miles
Excellent summer tyres, very happy with grip in dry and wet. Lasted well with almost 40k miles before replacing on 2.0 tdi front wheel drive. Replaced originals with same tyres at 35k miles because weather got bad and wanted new rubber for snow, but even with new tyres they were bad in snow on heavier car. Replaced them with a seperate set of winter tyres and amazing difference in bad conditions. Don't think I'd go back to having one set for all year round ever again.
Helpful 10 - tyre reviewed on September 12, 2012
Given 64% while driving a Mazda 6 (205/55 R16 V) on a combination of roads for 28,000 average miles
good wear, 28,000 miles from new on rear,had them on front but noisey and tramlined when worn.Poor in snow/ice conditions ay with wear ratend not overall impressed onl
Helpful 9 - tyre reviewed on September 8, 2012
Given 60% while driving a Mercedes Benz SLK 200 (245/40 R17) on mostly motorways for 9,000 average miles
These tyres were fitted by Mercedes from manufacture. Bought the new Slk in July 2011, at it's first service in July 2012 was informed that both rear tyres were ready for replacement due to tread wear!! Have only driven 9000 miles and at a push may get another 500 out of them. Contacted Bridgestone who stated the mileage was about right, but can range up to 15,000. Big variation between 9 and 15 thousand. I am taking this up with Mercedes as I am less than impressed. My previous Slk did about 15000 before the rear tyres were anything like ready for replacement. I seem to recall they were Pirelli. Would be interested to hear from any other new SLK owners with the same problem.
Helpful 9 - tyre reviewed on September 6, 2012
Given 91% while driving a Skoda Fabia vRS (205/45 R16 W) on a combination of roads for 5,000 average miles
My first experience of these were a worn pair that I had fitted to replace some awful budget tyres (Infinity's). I ran the Bridgestone's on the front of my VRS (1.9 TDI) until, dare I say, probably an illegal limit.Even so they still performed better in every condition (especially the wet), than the Infinity's which had plenty of tread left.

I have since had a new pair fitted to the front, which I am pleased to say have not given me any reason to change my thoughts on this tyre. Unfortunately I am still running a pair of Infinity tyres on the back, and regardless of the condition of the Bridgestone's fitted to the front, the Infinity on the rear will let go a long time before the front does.

In the dry these tyres are as good as, if not better than any tyre I have experienced so far.
The only time that I have managed to lose grip from these Bridgestone's is during wet cornering, and it must be said that a poor driving style was needed to do this. In wet conditions full acceleration mid corner will lose traction and give under-steer, which i'm not sure any tyre would give a different result since the VRS has a large amount of torque. Otherwise I would certainly buy these tyres again as I really can not fault them in any way so far.

Obviously a cars set up will alter how they use their tyres, but I certainly haven't experenced a better tyre, specially at this price.
Helpful 10 - tyre reviewed on August 14, 2012
Given 89% while driving a Nissan R33 Skyline GtS25T (205/55 R16 V) on a combination of roads for 25,000 spirited miles
Been using these on the rears of my RWD Skyline (with directionals on the front) - the ER300 is simply a fantastic tyre! Great in the dry, rock solid in the wet - they simply don't want to give up. Excellent wear, progressiveness, great value (often find these around the £75 mark). Yes, they are noisy. Can't have it all. Even very worn, they outperform many similarly priced new tyres - can't praise them enough.

Moved from Goodyear F1s to these because of their superior winter performance - and any RWD car in the wet is a serious test of cold weather performance. The F1s are a fantastic summer tyre, but useless - and dangerous - in snow/ice. But then they're not designed for cold weather.

Considering Bridgestone A001 this winter.
Helpful 9 - tyre reviewed on August 3, 2012
Given 73% while driving a Citroën Xsara (195/55 R15 V) on mostly town for 3,500 easy going miles
Bought 2nd hand at very good condition 4 of these and at a bargain price, half the price for a new Chinese tyre set. Have had around 5000 kilometers over town roads and motorways. Very impressed on the way that the car handle on wet roads, very good on dry too. Good breaking distances, moderate wear. Although I am a Michelin fan, these tyres proved to be a very good purchase.
Helpful 10 - tyre reviewed on July 26, 2012
Given 76% while driving a Subaru forester 2.5xt (225/55 R17 V) on a combination of roads for 50 average miles
Fitted as a dealer option on 17 inch factory rims on new 2009 Subaru Forrester. Wifes daily drive/business car. Averages approx 600km weekly over three years.
Over 80,000km Highway and city and around 5% dirt roads. Just worn on outside edge of steer tyres and still have legal tread depth. One flat repaired.
Excellent all round performance. Will buy again.
This set are marked Australian made. Hopefully replacements will return the same performance.
Helpful 10 - tyre reviewed on July 20, 2012
Given 80% while driving a Opel astra h 1.6 (205/55 R16) on a combination of roads for 60,000 average miles
Pretty noisy tyre, but very good road handling.
Helpful 8 - tyre reviewed on July 17, 2012