In this article we will be looking at independent tyre test data, and real world driver reviews of the Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 and the Kumho Ecsta PS71 to find out which tyre is best for your own driving.
There are a few basic differences between the two tyres. The Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 is an Max-Performance Summer tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger-Cars, and the Kumho Ecsta PS71 is an Ultra-High-Performance Summer tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger-Cars
Independent comparison tyre tests are the best source of data to get tyre information from, and the good news is there have been seven tests which compare both tyres directly!
Out of these seven tests:
While it might look like the Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 is better than the Kumho Ecsta PS71 purely based on the higher number of test wins, tyres are very complicated objects which means where one tyre is better than the other can be more important in real world use.
Let's look at how the two tyres compare across multiple tyre test categories.
Looking at data from six tyre tests, the Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 was better during six dry braking tests. On average the Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 stopped the vehicle in 3.64% less distance than the Kumho Ecsta PS71.
Best In Dry Braking: Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3
See how the Dry Braking winner was calculated >>
2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout 225/45 R17 |
✓ Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3:35.2M | Kumho Ecsta PS71: 37.1M |
2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 225/45 R17 |
✓ Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3:35.2M | Kumho Ecsta PS71: 37.1M |
2020 Tyre Market Overview Braking Test 245/45 R18 |
✓ Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3:34.7M | Kumho Ecsta PS71: 34.9M |
2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 245/45 R18 |
✓ Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3:34.7M | Kumho Ecsta PS71: 34.9M |
2023 Summer Tyre Market Overview 225/45 R18 |
✓ Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3:33.3M | Kumho Ecsta PS71: 35.1M |
2023 AutoBild UHP Summer Tyre Test 225/45 R18 |
✓ Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3:33.3M | Kumho Ecsta PS71: 35.1M |
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 was better during three dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 was 1.16% faster around a lap than the Kumho Ecsta PS71.
Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 225/45 R17 |
✓ Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3:117.5Km/H | Kumho Ecsta PS71: 116.3Km/H |
2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 245/45 R18 |
✓ Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3:116.2Km/H | Kumho Ecsta PS71: 114.3Km/H |
2023 AutoBild UHP Summer Tyre Test 225/45 R18 |
✓ Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3:119.4Km/H | Kumho Ecsta PS71: 118.4Km/H |
Looking at data from six tyre tests, the Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 was better during four wet braking tests. On average the Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 stopped the vehicle in 3.5% less distance than the Kumho Ecsta PS71.
Best In Wet Braking: Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3
See how the Wet Braking winner was calculated >>
2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout 225/45 R17 |
✓ Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3:28.7M | Kumho Ecsta PS71: 31.6M |
2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 225/45 R17 |
✓ Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3:28.7M | Kumho Ecsta PS71: 31.6M |
2020 Tyre Market Overview Braking Test 245/45 R18 |
Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3:30.3M | ✓ Kumho Ecsta PS71: 29M |
2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 245/45 R18 |
Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3:47.3M | ✓ Kumho Ecsta PS71: 45.3M |
2023 Summer Tyre Market Overview 225/45 R18 |
✓ Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3:24.8M | Kumho Ecsta PS71: 26.6M |
2023 AutoBild UHP Summer Tyre Test 225/45 R18 |
✓ Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3:38.7M | Kumho Ecsta PS71: 41.6M |
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 and Kumho Ecsta PS71 performed equally well in wet handling [km/h] tests.
Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Both tyres performed equally well
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 225/45 R17 |
Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3:73.2Km/H | Kumho Ecsta PS71: 73.2Km/H |
2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 245/45 R18 |
Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3:72.1Km/H | ✓ Kumho Ecsta PS71: 73.2Km/H |
2023 AutoBild UHP Summer Tyre Test 225/45 R18 |
✓ Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3:75.7Km/H | Kumho Ecsta PS71: 74.6Km/H |
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 was better during two straight aqua tests. On average the Kumho Ecsta PS71 floated at a 0.97% higher speed than the Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3.
Best In Straight Aqua: Kumho Ecsta PS71
See how the Straight Aqua winner was calculated >>
2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 225/45 R17 |
Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3:95.1Km/H | ✓ Kumho Ecsta PS71: 95.5Km/H |
2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 245/45 R18 |
Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3:95.4Km/H | ✓ Kumho Ecsta PS71: 98.5Km/H |
2023 AutoBild UHP Summer Tyre Test 225/45 R18 |
✓ Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3:104.3Km/H | Kumho Ecsta PS71: 103.7Km/H |
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 was better during one curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Kumho Ecsta PS71 slipped out at a 2.75% higher speed than the Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3.
Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Kumho Ecsta PS71
See how the Curved Aquaplaning winner was calculated >>
2023 AutoBild UHP Summer Tyre Test 225/45 R18 |
Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3:3.53m/sec2 | ✓ Kumho Ecsta PS71: 3.63m/sec2 |
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 was better during one subj. comfort tests. On average the Kumho Ecsta PS71 scored 14.29% more points than the Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3.
Best In Subj. Comfort: Kumho Ecsta PS71
See how the Subj. Comfort winner was calculated >>
2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 225/45 R17 |
Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3:6 Points | ✓ Kumho Ecsta PS71: 7 Points |
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 was better during three noise tests. On average the Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 measured 2.52% quieter than the Kumho Ecsta PS71.
Best In Noise: Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3
See how the Noise winner was calculated >>
2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 225/45 R17 |
✓ Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3:71.8dB | Kumho Ecsta PS71: 74.1dB |
2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 245/45 R18 |
✓ Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3:72.2dB | Kumho Ecsta PS71: 72.4dB |
2023 AutoBild UHP Summer Tyre Test 225/45 R18 |
✓ Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3:72.2dB | Kumho Ecsta PS71: 75.3dB |
Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 was better during three wear tests. On average the Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 is predicted to cover 16.2% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Kumho Ecsta PS71.
Best In Wear: Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3
See how the Wear winner was calculated >>
2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 225/45 R17 |
✓ Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3:41340KM | Kumho Ecsta PS71: 26520KM |
2020 ADAC 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test 225/40 R18 |
✓ Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3:35800KM | Kumho Ecsta PS71: 28200KM |
2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 245/45 R18 |
✓ Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3:26042KM | Kumho Ecsta PS71: 22450KM |
2023 AutoBild UHP Summer Tyre Test 225/45 R18 |
Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3:35200KM | ✓ Kumho Ecsta PS71: 38800KM |
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 was better during two value tests. On average the Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 proved to have a 5.57% better value based on price/1000km than the Kumho Ecsta PS71.
Best In Value: Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3
See how the Value winner was calculated >>
2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 225/45 R17 |
✓ Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3:9.19Price/1000 | Kumho Ecsta PS71: 12.07Price/1000 |
2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 245/45 R18 |
✓ Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3:16.9Price/1000 | Kumho Ecsta PS71: 19.15Price/1000 |
2023 AutoBild UHP Summer Tyre Test 225/45 R18 |
Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3:15.06Price/1000 | ✓ Kumho Ecsta PS71: 12.37Price/1000 |
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 was better during three price tests. On average the Kumho Ecsta PS71 cost 8.89% less than the Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3.
Best In Price: Kumho Ecsta PS71
See how the Price winner was calculated >>
2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 225/45 R17 |
Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3:380 | ✓ Kumho Ecsta PS71: 320 |
2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 245/45 R18 |
Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3:440 | ✓ Kumho Ecsta PS71: 430 |
2023 AutoBild UHP Summer Tyre Test 225/45 R18 |
Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3:530 | ✓ Kumho Ecsta PS71: 480 |
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 was better during two rolling resistance tests. On average the Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 had a 8.73% lower rolling resistance than the Kumho Ecsta PS71.
Best In Rolling Resistance: Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3
See how the Rolling Resistance winner was calculated >>
2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 225/45 R17 |
✓ Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3:9.48kg / t | Kumho Ecsta PS71: 11.06kg / t |
2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 245/45 R18 |
✓ Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3:8.15kg / t | Kumho Ecsta PS71: 9.05kg / t |
2023 AutoBild UHP Summer Tyre Test 225/45 R18 |
Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3:8.09kg / t | ✓ Kumho Ecsta PS71: 8.06kg / t |
Tyre Reviews also collects real world driver reviews for the Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 and Kumho Ecsta PS71.
In total the Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 has been reviewed 56 times and drivers have given the tyre 77% overall.
The Kumho Ecsta PS71 has been reviewed 76 times and drivers have given the tyre 78% overall.
This means in real world driving, people prefer the Kumho Ecsta PS71.
In conclusion the Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 performed better in dry braking, dry handling [km/h], wet braking, noise, wear, value and rolling resistance, while the Kumho Ecsta PS71 performed better in straight aqua, curved aquaplaning, subj. comfort and price.
Interestingly, both tyres performed equally well in wet handling [km/h], showing that they are closely matched in these areas.
Which tyre is best for you depends a lot on your driving style and situation, plus what you want from the tyre. Comparing all the data in the tyre reviews database, on balance Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 seems to be the best tyre overall.
However, it's important to note that both tyres have their strengths.
Remember, the best tyre for you might depend on which of these factors are most important for your specific driving needs and conditions.
Looking for more tyre comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tyres:
This page has been developed using tyre industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tyres in the same test.
Why is this important? Tyre testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tyre test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tyre tests performed on different days or at different locations.
As a result you will see other tests on Tyre Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.
Lots of other websites do this sort of tyre comparison, Tyre Reviews doesn't.