The Falken FK520 is structurally stronger than the FK510 to improve steering precision and feedback, and is 10 percent lighter to improve unsprung mass and rolling resistance. It also improves dry and wet grip thanks to advanced compounding.
Tyre review data from 34 tyre reviews averaging 85% over 166,730 miles driven, and 12 tests with an average result of 7th.
First On Market | January 2022 |
Wheel Size | 17 - 21" |
Width | 205 - 325mm |
Profile | 30 - 65 |
Rolling Resistance | A - D |
Wet Grip | A - A |
Noise (dB) | 68 - 72 |
Winter Rating | Not Winter Rated |
The Azenis FK520 is ranked 17th of 79 Summer Max Performance tyres.
This tyre replaced the Falken Azenis FK510.
In Depth Tyre Comparisons
12
5th
8th
7th
Size | Fuel | Wet | Noise |
---|---|---|---|
17 inch | |||
225/45R17 94 V XL | A | A | 69 |
225/45R17 94 Y XL | C | A | 70 |
225/50R17 98 Y XL | C | A | 70 |
215/45R17 91 Y XL | D | A | 70 |
205/50R17 93 Y XL | C | A | 70 |
235/65R17 108 W XL | C | A | 70 |
225/45R17 94 V XL | A | A | 69 |
225/45R17 91 Y | C | A | 70 |
225/45R17 94 W XL | A | A | 68 |
225/45R17 91 Y | C | A | 70 |
225/45R17 94 W XL | A | A | 68 |
18 inch | |||
235/60R18 107 V XL | A | A | 70 |
225/40R18 92 Y XL | C | A | 70 |
245/40R18 97 Y XL | C | A | 70 |
245/45R18 100 Y XL | C | A | 70 |
255/35R18 94 Y XL | C | A | 70 |
235/60R18 107 W XL | C | A | 70 |
245/45R18 100 Y XL | C | A | 71 |
225/40R18 92 Y XL | C | A | 70 |
225/40R18 92 Y XL | C | A | 70 |
20 inch | |||
255/45R20 105 Y XL | C | A | 70 |
Just purchased and ordered 4 Falken Azenis FK520 for my 2015 7 series BMW, and I am fitting them next week. They are replacing my Goodyear asymmetric 2 that handle well but have worn quite badly. My car is a heavy high speed and I go quite fast on the motorway and I cover huge miles.
There are very few reviews on your 520 tyre as it is new, and unlike the FK510, the reviews are not as encouraging. Your Azenis older FK510 has much better reviews fantastic grip in wet and dry and a seemingly better and more confident looking tread pattern than this new FK520 tyre, and I am wondering whether I have made the right decision. I have read all the advanced tech on the FK520 being stiffer and lighter but I am disappointed that wet braking and handling of the FK520 is lower than the FK510. I always expect that a new developed tyre should always be a significant improvement over the old one.
You have extensively tested your FK520 on the race track so please kindly let me know the how performance characteristics of this tyre over the FK510.to your reply.
We will never publish or share your email address
Size | Price Range | |
---|---|---|
215/45 R17 | £97.40 - £97.40 (1 Prices) | Compare Prices >> |
225/45 R17 | £90.05 - £111.56 (5 Prices) | Compare Prices >> |
225/45 R18 | £127.96 - £147.02 (2 Prices) | Compare Prices >> |
235/35 R19 | £124.96 - £149.99 (2 Prices) | Compare Prices >> |
235/65 R17 | £124.96 - £138.85 (2 Prices) | Compare Prices >> |
245/45 R17 | £122.95 - £138.44 (2 Prices) | Compare Prices >> |
315/35 R20 | £211.96 - £239.11 (2 Prices) | Compare Prices >> |
Available in 113 tyre sizes - View all. |
Have YOU got experience with the Falken Azenis FK520? Help millions of other tyre buyers