Continental Eco Contact 3 Reviews - Page 2

Given 66% while driving a Fiat Punto 1.2 8v (225/45 R17) on mostly town for 15,000 average miles
Had the tyres for 12 months and with around 250 miles per week on them between Watford and Oxford they have been worn bold below the legal limit. Wet grip is good considering the price of the tyre online and it being an 'eco' tyre. Very dissapointed at the wear rate however and this has been a regular comment from fellow continental tyre users.
Helpful 29 - tyre reviewed on January 20, 2014
Given 87% while driving a Peugeot (185/65 R14 T) on a combination of roads for 60,000 average miles
Perfect for my driving style and my car. I been using Continental Eco Contact 3 for the last 8 years without any problems.
Helpful 47 - tyre reviewed on December 13, 2013
Given 60% while driving a Daewoo Lanos (175/70 R13 T) on a combination of roads for 15,000 spirited miles
on my car now for 3 years, may say its a good tyre for my 1.4 lanos, front tyres tread is half way so i changed front to back at the sevice station in Athens Greece and wow !!!! ... all 4 tyres on the tread had peelings and missing tread, went to dealer and tolled him my problem, he wasn't surprised at all, told him i have a 4 year warranty he just laughed ... CONTINENTALS ARE NOT FOR ME ...!!!!
Helpful 29 - tyre reviewed on October 19, 2013
What to know the BEST All Season Tyres for 2024? Click to find out!
Given 88% while driving a Renault modified 4CV and modified R8 (165/65 R14) on mostly country roads for 0 spirited miles
Each of my cars has 165/65-14 fronts & 185/60-14 rears & is rear-engined with swing axles. Wet braking, wet lateral grip (damp not deep puddles) & predictable & talkative limit behaviour are my priorities. The EC3s succeed well on those terms. I have no interest in how long they last or how comfortable they are & generally prefer softer, quick wearing, slick-road-competent, compounds. If they have a fault, then it's a fairly soggy structure. My cure for that is to run them with pressures in the mid thirties to gain the front end response I want & then adjust the rear to get the handling balance I like. Works nicely &, as their wet grip is better than anything much else I can get in the size in Australia, it's a small fault to compensate for. I'm a repeat customer although I've recently fitted Premium Contact 2s to the front of the 4CV (same comments as the above except crisper in turn in). Recommended.
Helpful 15 - tyre reviewed on July 27, 2013
Given 33% while driving a Fiat Panda (155/80 R13 T) on a combination of roads for 2,000 average miles
Dry grip and feedback: Not good; feels like the road is wet even when warm and dry. Car never feels confident in a straight line and gets blown off course by crosswinds and while passing big trucks. Adjusting air pressures between Fiat's recommended maximum speed+load setting, then back down to standard pressures made little difference.
Wet grip: OK on wet tarmac is the best I can say about the Continental EcoContact 3. Tread has few sipes (tiny grooves) so winter grip is likely to be poor (another reviewer described zero braking on ice).
Progressiveness: I concur with the X19 driver about understeer, vagueness and general softness. Cornering grip starts low and deteriorates with squealing or grinding as the front wheels drift wide; at least the back wheels never break loose. The front-wheel-drive Panda is no sports car but I have driven several of this same model that feel much better with different tyres.
Comfort: Smooth riding but very noisy above 100kph=60mph. Requires earplugs, killing conversation and music on long trips. Other tyres on this make and model car have been much quieter.
Wear: If these had been on my own car instead of a rental, I would not wait for them to wear out; they would be replaced with better rubber. No, I would not buy them again and will advise others against their purchase.
Helpful 17 - tyre reviewed on January 5, 2013
Given 99% while driving a Smart fortwo passion (145/65 R14) on mostly motorways for 0 spirited miles
Smart car drivers are either progressive or programmed purely for local town driving.

Either circumstances lend themselves to these tyres.

Have driven on them since 2008, however suffered premature wear due to my Smart dealership, Smart Mercedes Benz Colindale, North West London, replacing steering components under warranty, and failing to re-track the vehicle. They admitted this offering £80 off next majoe service - no thank you!

Both front tyres endured advanced inner edge wear at 23,000miles. Rest of tyres had negligible wear at this mileage. Rear tyres also negligible wear.

Conti are perhaps the best tyres suited to Smart's.

Have driven car to within 100% of handling limits in controlled IAM Skills Day, and found the Conti's provide early warning of understeer, Smart's achilles heel.

Disagree strongly on previous postings on handling.
Helpful 10 - tyre reviewed on December 15, 2012
Given 66% while driving a Alfa Romeo 146 1.4 Twin Spark (185/60 R14 H) on a combination of roads for 9,320 average miles
Have been using these on my Alfa Romeo 146 1.4 Twin Spark for 2 years now, I have to say the dry grip is very good, wet grip is slightly less than what you'd anticipate. They do provide adequate feedback and they are progressive enough; wear, after 15.000 km, is minimal - almost all the tread is still there. As far as comfort is concerned, they are good, but next time I'll go for the much improved ContiEcoContact 5 ones.
Helpful 12 - tyre reviewed on December 3, 2012
Given 91% while driving a Opel corsa d 1.3 cdti (185/65 R15 H) on a combination of roads for 40,000 average miles
i made 63000km. i guess i ll make 10000 more with the same tyres. little bit noisy but both wet and dry performance is so sufficient.
Helpful 12 - tyre reviewed on October 17, 2012
Given 89% while driving a Skoda Octavia (225/45 R17) on mostly motorways for 100,000 easy going miles
Great tyre. Still have two of the original 4 set on the car, after doing 100k KM on them. They're at the limit now, but after 100k what more can you ask? Great performance on wet and dry, slightly noisy but only compared to high end, great fuel consumption/low resistance, not to mention the ultra low wear. Fishing for new tyres now, and will stick to Conti, but probably will switch to it's younger brother the EcoContact 5 if the price is right. Highly recommended for the value for money.
Helpful 12 - tyre reviewed on August 11, 2012
Given 57% while driving a Toyota AYGO (155/65 R14) on a combination of roads for 12,000 spirited miles
Have these tyres on my Aygo, an 800kg car, very light.
After just 12k miles I'm down to around 3mm of tread and not that impressed with the wear, even given my heavy right foot.
Also had a terrifying moment on ice with these tyres at 10mph where I slid for a few hundred metres, up onto a raised cross-road, across and down the other side. They offered no braking what so ever.
Having said that, they do cope surprisingly well in the dry and rain. I think ice is a bit too harsh condition for them.
Will certainly be looking into alternatives when replacing them, or at least looking into winter tyres.
Helpful 13 - tyre reviewed on June 4, 2012
Given 73% while driving a Renault Laguna I (185/65 R14 T) on mostly motorways for 20,000 easy going miles
Been using them at the front axle for about 30.000 km
They seem to be at about half thread.
Never had a problem with ther grip, but I'm an easy rider.

Well done
Helpful 12 - tyre reviewed on April 22, 2012
Given 79% while driving a Ford Focus MK1 (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 3,000 average miles
I wear these tyres for about 4000 miles . Super low noise , good turns and brake distance . Very nice.
Helpful 13 - tyre reviewed on March 29, 2012