Yokohama BluEarth AE50 Reviews - Page 3

Given 54% while driving a Volvo C70 T5 GT (225/45 R17) on mostly town for 5,000 easy going miles
Just over 5000 miles, admittedly on front of a front wheel drive. Put them on January last year one failed and one warning on the MOT this February. Sedate driving, mainly my wife going to work.
Helpful 19 - tyre reviewed on February 22, 2016
Given 64% while driving a Honda Civic (205/55 R16 V) on a combination of roads for 1,000 average miles
Previously had Goodyear efficient grip performance from previous car, compared to the Yokohamas, the Yokohamas feel more vague on the roads, grip seems less than the goodyears as well. It also feels very light, which make the car feel twitchy. It feels that the car floats on the roads when driving. The only thing I like is that the tyre structure is harder than the goodyears , which feels more robust.
However, if I get to choose again, I would go back to goodyears, they are better on grip, road feedback and comfort.
Helpful 28 - tyre reviewed on February 18, 2016
Given 63% while driving a Saab Automobile 9 3 Vector Sport Sportwagon (150) (225/45 R17 W) on a combination of roads for 12,000 average miles
When new, dry and wet grip, noise and comfort all good. The huge disappointment has been the wear - after barely 12000 miles the fronts are down to 3mm and now aquaplane alarmingly, so they'll have to be replaced a bit earlier than I normally would. Won't be buying these again.
Helpful 12 - tyre reviewed on October 13, 2015
What to know the BEST All Season Tyres for 2024? Click to find out!
Given 83% while driving a Honda Civic Type R (225/40 R18) on a combination of roads for 10,000 easy going miles
Bought these for my Civic Type R, replacing Falken ZE912. I wanted to go back to Yokohama as I used to use the Prada spec 2, which were awesome in the dry by scary in the wet.

I've had these tyres on for a week now, and they are a marked improvemt over the Falkens they replaced. The car seems to run freer and the grip gives you far more confidence. The Falkens used to be really twitchy at the rear, but the AE50 is solid. The biggest difference is when accelerating. With the Falken, the tyres would always sqreech and spin a little throuogh the low gear changes. The AE50 stays planted throughout.

I have no idea on the wear as yet, the Prada 2 used to go quite quickly, but I did drive them hard. I'd be happy if I got 12k out of the front.

Overall a good tyre. I would buy again, but if my budget allows I may go for a higher spec Yokohama, as I've always liked them.
Helpful 15 - tyre reviewed on August 10, 2015
Given 73% while driving a Citroën C5 Tourer (225/55 R17 W) on a combination of roads for 3,000 average miles
Recently changed from Michelin Primacy HP to Yokohama Bluearth AE50,and very pleased.

This tyre size is not very common, so my tyre dealer presented this new tyre from Yokohama, wich had very good price, when compared to other major brands.

So far, the car feels more responsive to my input, no issues in the wet, and no difference in tyre noise.

If you are thinking about using this tyre, I see it as perfectly contender, within the "usual suspects"
Helpful 15 - tyre reviewed on June 8, 2015
Given 83% while driving a Mitsubishi Lancer GLX (195/60 R15 H) on mostly town for 1,000 average miles
Good dry and wet grips. Value for money. Noise level still acceptable. Anyway, you can't have best of both worlds, good grips in exchange for noise, I think it's worth the buy. Furthermore, it is made in Japan.
Helpful 11 - tyre reviewed on August 22, 2014
Given 87% while driving a Mercedes Benz B250 Petrol (225/40 R18 W) on track for 100 spirited miles
Recently tested these tyres back to back with other major brand tyres under all conditions (wet/dry grip,braking,noise,comfort ect). Not only did the Yokohama AE50 perform better than the competition it had more tread remaining and looked visibly less used. Would recommend with confidence.
Helpful 17 - tyre reviewed on July 22, 2014