Goodyear Eagle F1 Directional 5 Reviews - Page 2

Given 90% while driving a Peugeot 306 GTI6 (195/55 R15 V) on a combination of roads for 16,000 spirited miles
Really nice mid-range performance tyre. Got rid of the Toyo Teo Pluses the previous owner had fitted as they just scrubbed and scrubbed with an even remotely spirited drive, the difference was night and day. Road noise is perfectly acceptable. Great road feel. They've done 26,000~km so far, and with how light my car is on the rears and timely rotations they'll probably just about do that again. Wouldn't hesitate to pick them up again when the time comes.
Helpful 25 - tyre reviewed on July 19, 2016
Given 84% while driving a Mitsubishi Proton Perdana Turbo (4G63T) (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 9,500 spirited miles
GYF1D5 is one of the best tyres i have ever fitted to my car. based on my "feel", in my opinion its on par or better with previous model top tyres such as PS2, F1A, F1GSD3, CSC3, N8000 (which i have fitted to my car before). dry grip and braking is excellent, wet grip and braking is excellent and the wear rate is superb. i feel confident speeding on hiway during rain.
Helpful 23 - tyre reviewed on December 12, 2015
Given 59% while driving a Hyundai Avante (205/45 R16 W) on a combination of roads for 3,000 spirited miles
Coming from Pilot Sport 3 this tyre did not perform at all. Dry grip is almost as good, but when rain comes the Pilot Sport 3 puts Directional 5 to shame in the wet grip category. Noise levels were quite similar to PS3 but PS3 still wins. That being said the Directional 5s were 30% cheaper than the Pilot Sport 3s would it be worth the cost savings for Directional 5s? Yes and No. Yes if you were coming from crappy tyres previously and upgraded to the directional 5s. No if you were using pilot sport 3 or even the Asymmetric 2. There are some things that money just cannot buy and safety is one of them. I feel absolutely safe when I go at 130km/hr on raining days but not with the Directional 5.
Helpful 104 - tyre reviewed on August 5, 2014
What to know the BEST All Season Tyres for 2024? Click to find out!
Given 88% while driving a Mercedes Benz E320 (225/55 R16) on a combination of roads for 2,000 spirited miles
Just replaced PS3s with these and initial findings are good. A bit cheaper (in Australia) than the Michelins but so far good in the wet and dry. A bit more tyre noise, but not intrusive.
Helpful 19 - tyre reviewed on June 18, 2014
Given 84% while driving a Renault Megane (225/45 R17 W) on mostly town for 10,000 average miles
I have had these on my (non-Cup chassis) Renaultsport Megane 225 here in Australia for about 18 months. The comfort and noise level are much better than the Bridgestone RE050s which I replaced, and the feedback is only marginally reduced.

Despite noticeably softer sidewalls, both dry and wet grip are also superior to the RE050s, even after another 15,000km or so. Progressiveness at the limit is brilliant, and they've really tamed the Megane's understeer. The tread is still very deep, so happy with the wear too.

Definitely recommended.
Helpful 17 - tyre reviewed on April 3, 2014
Given 74% while driving a Nissan 350z (225/45 R17) on mostly country roads for 0 average miles
Gy D5 is better grip then hankook v12 evo ,only problem is soft side wall... Test on my nissan 350z .excellence grip....
Helpful 14 - tyre reviewed on October 6, 2013
Given 86% while driving a BMW 528i Touring Sport (225/55 R17 W) on mostly motorways for 8,000 average miles
As I'd like to stick to the stock wheels and there is not much choice for performance tyres of this size, I picked the Directional 5 without much expectation.

The sidewall is pretty soft and I've to pump up to pretty high tyre pressure to support my 5-series weight. Other than that, I have actually got nothing negative to say about the tyres.

Dry Grip is as good as PS3 and even though the rubber tends to be on the soft side, it still manages to provide more than enough road feedback and make you feel “connected”. Wet Grip is exceptional and the downside to this is that you tend not to slow much down even under a downpour.

With all these performance, one would expect to pay the price in term of noise but strange enough they are minimal c/o other performance tyres. I can't comment on the wear as mine is still pretty new ~8000km mileage.
Helpful 15 - tyre reviewed on August 2, 2013
Given 97% while driving a Alfa Romeo 156 JTS Ti (225/45 R17 W) on a combination of roads for 12,000 spirited miles
I was extremely surprised by the quality of this tyre, despite being under $200 and manufactured in Thailand.

In 15,000km of driving, mixing high-speed country roads and spirited town/freeway driving, I've never once lost traction while conering

Dry grip is 10/10, wet grip is 9.5/10.

A fantastic tyre for the price.
Helpful 17 - tyre reviewed on June 29, 2013
Given 77% while driving a Subaru WRX STi Type R (215/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 2,000 spirited miles
These are a very good tyre so far after 3000km, been using Bridgestone all my life and felt like something different, the tyres have very good grip in the dry and wet, the feel and progressiveness is very good. I drive the car very hard on B roads and hillclimbs and sealed sprints, turn in is pretty good too. But after a while of driving hard they do get slightly greasy, but that's to be expected for a street tyre.
Helpful 18 - tyre reviewed on January 5, 2013
Given 79% while driving a Suzuki swift sport (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 65,000 spirited miles
Prior to Goodyear Directional 5 (D5), I had used Silverstone Kruizer NS500, Michelin Pilot Preceda 2 (PP2) and Continental Premium Contact 2 (CPC2).
Comparing to previous tyres, D5 has the best handling. You get a lot of road feedback from the front tyres. The braking feels progressive too. As for hard cornering, it is one of the best, on par with PP2. Unlike CPC2, there is no squeaking sound from rear tyres during hard cornering. So that sums up handling side during dry condition in terms of road feedback, progressiveness and hard cornering (traction).
You can expect similar situation for handling during wet condition except that it doesn't grip as good as PP2 during braking.
As for hard braking of dry condition, it is difficult to gage due to road condition and very much depends on the brake pad and rotor performance.
Nevertheless it is still a good mid performance tyre with attractive price. If your car tyre size is bigger, I recommend going for more expensive tyres such as Michelin Pilot Sport 3 (PS3) and Continental Conti Sport Contact 3 (CSC3).
Helpful 13 - tyre reviewed on October 25, 2012
Given 84% while driving a Honda Civic FD1 1.8 i Vtec (215/45 R17 W) on mostly motorways for 500 average miles
I bought these tyres to replace my set of worn out Falken ZE912 as the price for the F1 D5 fit into my bubget as compare to Asy2 or PS3.
The first impresion on the road was excellent taking the consideration it is made in Thailand and the affortable price.

The road feedback and grip on the dry is much better compare to my old Falken.
In the wet, there are able to cut through puddles with ease and without any drama.
The road noise is very well muted despite the directional design.
As for tread wear, it is rate 300, and i believe it should be able to last for quite some time.

i have friends who fiited the GSD3 on their rides, and they are impressed with the level of road noise and the grip of the D5 as compare to GSD3.


Helpful 12 - tyre reviewed on October 19, 2012
Given 90% while driving a Audi A6, 3.2L, Quattro (225/45 R17) on mostly town for 100 average miles
Still need to spend time with these tyres. But so far very happy. Very tight turn in responsive to input without feeling like driving on extreme low profiles.
Helpful 14 - tyre reviewed on September 15, 2012