In this article we will be looking at independent tyre test data, and real world driver reviews of the Continental SportContact 7 and the Vredestein Ultrac Pro to find out which tyre is best for your own driving.
The good news is that both the Continental SportContact 7 and Vredestein Ultrac Pro are Max Performance Summer tyres designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars, which means comparing the two tyres is relatively simple.
Both tyres are hugely popular in the market place with drivers, and both have been featured in independent tyre tests.
Independent comparison tyre tests are the best source of data to get tyre information from, and the good news is there have been three tests which compare both tyres directly!
Out of these three tests:
While it might look like the Continental SportContact 7 is better than the Vredestein Ultrac Pro purely based on the higher number of test wins, tyres are very complicated objects which means where one tyre is better than the other can be more important in real world use.
Let's look at how the two tyres compare across multiple tyre test categories.
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Continental SportContact 7 was better during three dry braking tests. On average the Continental SportContact 7 stopped the vehicle in 5.77% less distance than the Vredestein Ultrac Pro.
Best In Dry Braking: Continental SportContact 7
See how the Dry Braking winner was calculated >>
2024 Sports Car Tyre Test 295/30 R20 |
✓ Continental SportContact 7:38.5M | Vredestein Ultrac Pro: 39.1M |
2024 EVO Summer Tyre Test 235/35 R19 |
✓ Continental SportContact 7:30.7M | Vredestein Ultrac Pro: 35.1M |
2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test 225/40 R18 |
✓ Continental SportContact 7:35.2M | Vredestein Ultrac Pro: 36.6M |
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Vredestein Ultrac Pro was better during one dry handling [s] tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac Pro was 0.39% faster around a lap than the Continental SportContact 7.
Best In Dry Handling [s]: Vredestein Ultrac Pro
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
2024 EVO Summer Tyre Test 235/35 R19 |
Continental SportContact 7:101.58s | ✓ Vredestein Ultrac Pro: 101.18s |
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Continental SportContact 7 was better during one dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Continental SportContact 7 was 0.64% faster around a lap than the Vredestein Ultrac Pro.
Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Continental SportContact 7
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
2024 Sports Car Tyre Test 295/30 R20 |
✓ Continental SportContact 7:109.2Km/H | Vredestein Ultrac Pro: 108.5Km/H |
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Continental SportContact 7 was better during one subj. dry handling tests. On average the Continental SportContact 7 scored 6.56% more points than the Vredestein Ultrac Pro.
Best In Subj. Dry Handling: Continental SportContact 7
See how the Subj. Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
2024 EVO Summer Tyre Test 235/35 R19 |
✓ Continental SportContact 7:61 Points | Vredestein Ultrac Pro: 57 Points |
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Continental SportContact 7 was better during two wet braking tests. On average the Continental SportContact 7 stopped the vehicle in 5.59% less distance than the Vredestein Ultrac Pro.
Best In Wet Braking: Continental SportContact 7
See how the Wet Braking winner was calculated >>
2024 Sports Car Tyre Test 295/30 R20 |
✓ Continental SportContact 7:49.2M | Vredestein Ultrac Pro: 53.1M |
2024 EVO Summer Tyre Test 235/35 R19 |
Continental SportContact 7:32.3M | Vredestein Ultrac Pro: 32.3M |
2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test 225/40 R18 |
✓ Continental SportContact 7:28.4M | Vredestein Ultrac Pro: 31M |
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Continental SportContact 7 was better during one wet braking - concrete tests. On average the Continental SportContact 7 stopped the vehicle in 8.8% less distance than the Vredestein Ultrac Pro.
Best In Wet Braking - Concrete: Continental SportContact 7
See how the Wet Braking - Concrete winner was calculated >>
2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test 225/40 R18 |
✓ Continental SportContact 7:34.2M | Vredestein Ultrac Pro: 37.5M |
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Continental SportContact 7 was better during one wet handling [s] tests. On average the Continental SportContact 7 was 0.79% faster around a wet lap than the Vredestein Ultrac Pro.
Best In Wet Handling [s]: Continental SportContact 7
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
2024 EVO Summer Tyre Test 235/35 R19 |
✓ Continental SportContact 7:69.25s | Vredestein Ultrac Pro: 69.8s |
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Continental SportContact 7 was better during one wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Continental SportContact 7 was 2.41% faster around a wet lap than the Vredestein Ultrac Pro.
Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Continental SportContact 7
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
2024 Sports Car Tyre Test 295/30 R20 |
✓ Continental SportContact 7:78.9Km/H | Vredestein Ultrac Pro: 77Km/H |
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Vredestein Ultrac Pro was better during one subj. wet handling tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac Pro scored 0.88% more points than the Continental SportContact 7.
Best In Subj. Wet Handling: Vredestein Ultrac Pro
See how the Subj. Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
2024 EVO Summer Tyre Test 235/35 R19 |
Continental SportContact 7:56.5 Points | ✓ Vredestein Ultrac Pro: 57 Points |
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Continental SportContact 7 was better during one wet circle tests. On average the Continental SportContact 7 was 3.32% faster around a wet circle than the Vredestein Ultrac Pro.
Best In Wet Circle: Continental SportContact 7
See how the Wet Circle winner was calculated >>
2024 Sports Car Tyre Test 295/30 R20 |
✓ Continental SportContact 7:10.78s | Vredestein Ultrac Pro: 11.15s |
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Vredestein Ultrac Pro was better during one straight aqua tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac Pro floated at a 0.78% higher speed than the Continental SportContact 7.
Best In Straight Aqua: Vredestein Ultrac Pro
See how the Straight Aqua winner was calculated >>
2024 Sports Car Tyre Test 295/30 R20 |
Continental SportContact 7:97.6Km/H | ✓ Vredestein Ultrac Pro: 100.3Km/H |
2024 EVO Summer Tyre Test 235/35 R19 |
✓ Continental SportContact 7:72Km/H | Vredestein Ultrac Pro: 71.76Km/H |
2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test 225/40 R18 |
✓ Continental SportContact 7:79.6Km/H | Vredestein Ultrac Pro: 79.1Km/H |
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Continental SportContact 7 was better during one curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Continental SportContact 7 slipped out at a 1.28% higher speed than the Vredestein Ultrac Pro.
Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Continental SportContact 7
See how the Curved Aquaplaning winner was calculated >>
2024 EVO Summer Tyre Test 235/35 R19 |
✓ Continental SportContact 7:67.14m/sec2 | Vredestein Ultrac Pro: 66.14m/sec2 |
2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test 225/40 R18 |
Continental SportContact 7:2.9m/sec2 | ✓ Vredestein Ultrac Pro: 3m/sec2 |
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Continental SportContact 7 was better during one subj. noise tests. On average the Continental SportContact 7 scored 4.08% more points than the Vredestein Ultrac Pro.
Best In Subj. Noise: Continental SportContact 7
See how the Subj. Noise winner was calculated >>
2024 EVO Summer Tyre Test 235/35 R19 |
✓ Continental SportContact 7:24.5 Points | Vredestein Ultrac Pro: 23.5 Points |
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Vredestein Ultrac Pro was better during two noise tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac Pro measured 2.33% quieter than the Continental SportContact 7.
Best In Noise: Vredestein Ultrac Pro
See how the Noise winner was calculated >>
2024 Sports Car Tyre Test 295/30 R20 |
Continental SportContact 7:73.4dB | ✓ Vredestein Ultrac Pro: 70.5dB |
2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test 225/40 R18 |
Continental SportContact 7:72.3dB | ✓ Vredestein Ultrac Pro: 71.8dB |
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Continental SportContact 7 was better during one wear tests. On average the Continental SportContact 7 is predicted to cover 7.6% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Vredestein Ultrac Pro.
Best In Wear: Continental SportContact 7
See how the Wear winner was calculated >>
2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test 225/40 R18 |
✓ Continental SportContact 7:43400KM | Vredestein Ultrac Pro: 40100KM |
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Vredestein Ultrac Pro was better during one value tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac Pro proved to have a 5.63% better value based on price/1000km than the Continental SportContact 7.
Best In Value: Vredestein Ultrac Pro
See how the Value winner was calculated >>
2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test 225/40 R18 |
Continental SportContact 7:12.26Price/1000 | ✓ Vredestein Ultrac Pro: 11.57Price/1000 |
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Vredestein Ultrac Pro was better during two rolling resistance tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac Pro had a 0.92% lower rolling resistance than the Continental SportContact 7.
Best In Rolling Resistance: Vredestein Ultrac Pro
See how the Rolling Resistance winner was calculated >>
2024 Sports Car Tyre Test 295/30 R20 |
Continental SportContact 7:8.36kg / t | ✓ Vredestein Ultrac Pro: 8.35kg / t |
2024 EVO Summer Tyre Test 235/35 R19 |
Continental SportContact 7:9.01kg / t | ✓ Vredestein Ultrac Pro: 8.86kg / t |
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Continental SportContact 7 was better during one fuel consumption tests. On average the Continental SportContact 7 used 3.51% less fuel than the Vredestein Ultrac Pro.
Best In Fuel Consumption: Continental SportContact 7
See how the Fuel Consumption winner was calculated >>
2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test 225/40 R18 |
✓ Continental SportContact 7:5.5l/100km | Vredestein Ultrac Pro: 5.7l/100km |
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Continental SportContact 7 was better during one abrasion tests. On average the Continental SportContact 7 emitted 16.03% less particle wear matter than the Vredestein Ultrac Pro.
Best In Abrasion: Continental SportContact 7
See how the Abrasion winner was calculated >>
2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test 225/40 R18 |
✓ Continental SportContact 7:63.4mg/km/t | Vredestein Ultrac Pro: 75.5mg/km/t |
Tyre Reviews also collects real world driver reviews for the Continental SportContact 7 and Vredestein Ultrac Pro.
In total the Continental SportContact 7 has been reviewed 63 times and drivers have given the tyre 86% overall.
The Vredestein Ultrac Pro has been reviewed 3 times and drivers have given the tyre 90% overall.
This means in real world driving, people prefer the Vredestein Ultrac Pro.
In conclusion the Continental SportContact 7 performed better in dry braking, dry handling [km/h], subj. dry handling, wet braking, wet braking - concrete, wet handling [s], wet handling [km/h], wet circle, curved aquaplaning, subj. noise, wear, fuel consumption and abrasion, while the Vredestein Ultrac Pro performed better in dry handling [s], subj. wet handling, straight aqua, noise, value and rolling resistance.
Which tyre is best for you depends a lot on your driving style and situation, plus what you want from the tyre. Comparing all the data in the tyre reviews database, on balance Continental SportContact 7 seems to be the best tyre overall.
However, it's important to note that both tyres have their strengths.
Remember, the best tyre for you might depend on which of these factors are most important for your specific driving needs and conditions.
Looking for more tyre comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tyres:
This page has been developed using tyre industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tyres in the same test.
Why is this important? Tyre testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tyre test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tyre tests performed on different days or at different locations.
As a result you will see other tests on Tyre Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.
Lots of other websites do this sort of tyre comparison, Tyre Reviews doesn't.