Vredestein Ultrac Pro vs Yokohama Advan Sport V107
In this article we will be looking at independent tyre test data, and real world driver reviews of the Vredestein Ultrac Pro and the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 to find out which tyre is best for your own driving.
There are a few basic differences between the two tyres. The Vredestein Ultrac Pro is an Max-Performance Summer tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger-Cars, and the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 is an Ultra-High-Performance Summer tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger-Cars
Test Results
Independent comparison tyre tests are the best source of data to get tyre information from, and the good news is there have been three tests which compare both tyres directly!
Out of these three tests:
- Vredestein Ultrac Pro finished ahead of the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 in two of the tests
- Yokohama Advan Sport V107 finished ahead of the Vredestein Ultrac Pro in one of the tests
While it might look like the Vredestein Ultrac Pro is better than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 purely based on the higher number of test wins, tyres are very complicated objects which means where one tyre is better than the other can be more important in real world use.
Let's look at how the two tyres compare across multiple tyre test categories.
Dry Braking
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 was better during three dry braking tests. On average the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 stopped the vehicle in 3.94% less distance than the Vredestein Ultrac Pro.
Best In Dry Braking: Yokohama Advan Sport V107
See how the Dry Braking winner was calculated >>
| 2025 Summer Tyre Test Shootout 225/40 R18 |
Vredestein Ultrac Pro:35M | ✓ Yokohama Advan Sport V107: 33.8M |
| 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test 225/40 R18 |
Vredestein Ultrac Pro:36.6M | ✓ Yokohama Advan Sport V107: 34.8M |
| 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tyre Test 225/40 R18 |
Vredestein Ultrac Pro:35M | ✓ Yokohama Advan Sport V107: 33.8M |
Dry Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 was better during one dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 was 1.92% faster around a lap than the Vredestein Ultrac Pro.
Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Yokohama Advan Sport V107
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
| 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tyre Test 225/40 R18 |
Vredestein Ultrac Pro:117.4Km/H | ✓ Yokohama Advan Sport V107: 119.7Km/H |
Wet Braking
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Vredestein Ultrac Pro was better during three wet braking tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac Pro stopped the vehicle in 1.41% less distance than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Wet Braking: Vredestein Ultrac Pro
See how the Wet Braking winner was calculated >>
| 2025 Summer Tyre Test Shootout 225/40 R18 |
✓ Vredestein Ultrac Pro:31.2M | Yokohama Advan Sport V107: 31.8M |
| 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test 225/40 R18 |
✓ Vredestein Ultrac Pro:31M | Yokohama Advan Sport V107: 31.2M |
| 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tyre Test 225/40 R18 |
✓ Vredestein Ultrac Pro:48.8M | Yokohama Advan Sport V107: 49.6M |
Wet Braking - Concrete
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Vredestein Ultrac Pro was better during one wet braking - concrete tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac Pro stopped the vehicle in 0.53% less distance than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Wet Braking - Concrete: Vredestein Ultrac Pro
See how the Wet Braking - Concrete winner was calculated >>
| 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test 225/40 R18 |
✓ Vredestein Ultrac Pro:37.5M | Yokohama Advan Sport V107: 37.7M |
Wet Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 was better during one wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 was 0.14% faster around a wet lap than the Vredestein Ultrac Pro.
Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Yokohama Advan Sport V107
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
| 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tyre Test 225/40 R18 |
Vredestein Ultrac Pro:71.3Km/H | ✓ Yokohama Advan Sport V107: 71.4Km/H |
Wet Circle
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Vredestein Ultrac Pro was better during one wet circle tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac Pro was 1.1% faster around a wet circle than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Wet Circle: Vredestein Ultrac Pro
See how the Wet Circle winner was calculated >>
| 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tyre Test 225/40 R18 |
✓ Vredestein Ultrac Pro:15.24s | Yokohama Advan Sport V107: 15.41s |
Straight Aqua
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Vredestein Ultrac Pro was better during two straight aqua tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac Pro floated at a 3.19% higher speed than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Straight Aqua: Vredestein Ultrac Pro
See how the Straight Aqua winner was calculated >>
| 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test 225/40 R18 |
✓ Vredestein Ultrac Pro:79.1Km/H | Yokohama Advan Sport V107: 75.9Km/H |
| 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tyre Test 225/40 R18 |
✓ Vredestein Ultrac Pro:80.7Km/H | Yokohama Advan Sport V107: 78.8Km/H |
Curved Aquaplaning
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Vredestein Ultrac Pro was better during two curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac Pro slipped out at a 2.52% higher speed than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Vredestein Ultrac Pro
See how the Curved Aquaplaning winner was calculated >>
| 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test 225/40 R18 |
✓ Vredestein Ultrac Pro:3m/sec2 | Yokohama Advan Sport V107: 2.9m/sec2 |
| 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tyre Test 225/40 R18 |
✓ Vredestein Ultrac Pro:3.35m/sec2 | Yokohama Advan Sport V107: 3.3m/sec2 |
Subj. Comfort
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Vredestein Ultrac Pro was better during one subj. comfort tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac Pro scored 22% more points than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Subj. Comfort: Vredestein Ultrac Pro
See how the Subj. Comfort winner was calculated >>
| 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tyre Test 225/40 R18 |
✓ Vredestein Ultrac Pro:5 Points | Yokohama Advan Sport V107: 3.9 Points |
Noise
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Vredestein Ultrac Pro was better during two noise tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac Pro measured 1.62% quieter than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Noise: Vredestein Ultrac Pro
See how the Noise winner was calculated >>
| 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test 225/40 R18 |
✓ Vredestein Ultrac Pro:71.8dB | Yokohama Advan Sport V107: 72.9dB |
| 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tyre Test 225/40 R18 |
✓ Vredestein Ultrac Pro:73.5dB | Yokohama Advan Sport V107: 74.8dB |
Wear
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Vredestein Ultrac Pro was better during one wear tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac Pro is predicted to cover 3.89% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Wear: Vredestein Ultrac Pro
See how the Wear winner was calculated >>
| 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test 225/40 R18 |
✓ Vredestein Ultrac Pro:40100KM | Yokohama Advan Sport V107: 34300KM |
| 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tyre Test 225/40 R18 |
Vredestein Ultrac Pro:32930KM | ✓ Yokohama Advan Sport V107: 35890KM |
Value
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Vredestein Ultrac Pro was better during one value tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac Pro proved to have a 1.47% better value based on price/1000km than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Value: Vredestein Ultrac Pro
See how the Value winner was calculated >>
| 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test 225/40 R18 |
✓ Vredestein Ultrac Pro:11.57Price/1000 | Yokohama Advan Sport V107: 13.18Price/1000 |
| 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tyre Test 225/40 R18 |
Vredestein Ultrac Pro:11.18Price/1000 | ✓ Yokohama Advan Sport V107: 9.92Price/1000 |
Rolling Resistance
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Vredestein Ultrac Pro was better during one rolling resistance tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac Pro had a 13.47% lower rolling resistance than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Rolling Resistance: Vredestein Ultrac Pro
See how the Rolling Resistance winner was calculated >>
| 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tyre Test 225/40 R18 |
✓ Vredestein Ultrac Pro:9.19kg / t | Yokohama Advan Sport V107: 10.62kg / t |
Fuel Consumption
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Vredestein Ultrac Pro and Yokohama Advan Sport V107 performed equally well in fuel consumption tests.
Best In Fuel Consumption: Both tyres performed equally well
See how the Fuel Consumption winner was calculated >>
| 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test 225/40 R18 |
Vredestein Ultrac Pro:5.7l/100km | Yokohama Advan Sport V107: 5.7l/100km |
Abrasion
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Vredestein Ultrac Pro was better during one abrasion tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac Pro emitted 20.53% less particle wear matter than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Abrasion: Vredestein Ultrac Pro
See how the Abrasion winner was calculated >>
| 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test 225/40 R18 |
✓ Vredestein Ultrac Pro:75.5mg/km/t | Yokohama Advan Sport V107: 95mg/km/t |
Real World Driver Reviews
Tyre Reviews also collects real world driver reviews for the Vredestein Ultrac Pro and Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
In total the Vredestein Ultrac Pro has been reviewed 3 times and drivers have given the tyre 90% overall.
The Yokohama Advan Sport V107 has been reviewed 15 times and drivers have given the tyre 75% overall.
This means in real world driving, people prefer the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Wet grip is also very handsome. You really feel comfortable driving in heavy rain, and the grip is also very reassuring. Especially in the wet
Conclusion
In conclusion the Vredestein Ultrac Pro performed better in wet braking, wet braking - concrete, wet circle, straight aqua, curved aquaplaning, subj. comfort, noise, wear, value, rolling resistance and abrasion, while the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 performed better in dry braking, dry handling [km/h] and wet handling [km/h].
Interestingly, both tyres performed equally well in fuel consumption, showing that they are closely matched in these areas.
Which tyre is best for you depends a lot on your driving style and situation, plus what you want from the tyre. Comparing all the data in the tyre reviews database, on balance Vredestein Ultrac Pro seems to be the best tyre overall.
However, it's important to note that both tyres have their strengths.
Remember, the best tyre for you might depend on which of these factors are most important for your specific driving needs and conditions.
Overall Winner: Vredestein Ultrac Pro
Based on the tyre test data and user reviews we have in our database, the Vredestein Ultrac Pro has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tyre has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tyre buying choice.Similar Comparisons
Looking for more tyre comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tyres:
Footnote
This page has been developed using tyre industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tyres in the same test.
Why is this important? Tyre testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tyre test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tyre tests performed on different days or at different locations.
As a result you will see other tests on Tyre Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.
Lots of other websites do this sort of tyre comparison, Tyre Reviews doesn't.
Best Tyre Tests
Best UUHP Tyres- Best Performance Summer Tyres
- Best Summer Tyres
Best All Season Tyres- Best UHP All Season Tyres
- Best All Weather Tyres
Best Winter Tyres- Best UHP Winter Tyres
- Best SUV Winter Tyres
- Best Studless Winter Tyres
- Best All Terrain [AT] Tyres
- Best SUV Summer Tyres
Summer Tyre Tests
- Best Performance Tyres For 2025
- The Best Touring Tyres for 2025 Tested
- 2025 Sport and Hypersport Motorcycle Tyre Test
- 2025 Teknikens Varld Summer Tyre Test
- 2025 Autobild SUV Off-Road Summer Tyre Test
- 2025 Al Volante Summer Tyre Test
- 2025 Sports Cars Tyre Test
- 2025 Summer and All Season Combined Tyre Test
- All Summer Tyre Tests
All Season Tyre Tests
- The BEST All Terrain Tyre for 2025
- The Best All Season Tyres for 2024 / 2025
- The Best All Season Tyres for 2024
- Best All Terrain Tyres Tested On Road, Off Road and Snow [2024]
- 2024 Sport Auto All Season Tyre Test
- 2024 Auto Bild SUV All Season Tyre Test
- 2024 Motor SUV All Season Tyre Test
- 2024 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test
- All All Season Tyre Tests
Winter Tyre Tests
- The BEST Performance Winter Tyres for 2024 / 2025
- 2024 Nordic Friction Winter Tyre Test
- 2024 Studded Tyre Test
- 2024 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tyre Test
- 2024 Auto Bild Sportscars Winter Tyre Test
- All Winter Tyre Tests
Features
- Continental AllSeasonContact 2 - Real World Review
- Understanding The Tyre Sidewall
- EU Tyre Label
- Summer VS All Season VS Winter
- Road vs Track vs Slick Tyres
- Michelin Pilot Sport 4S vs 4S * (BMW)
- OE vs Aftermarket Tyres
- Winter Tyres Tested at 0c to15c
Tyre Reviews
General
- Submit your review
- About Tyre Reviews
- Tyre Reviews Ethics
- Site Map
- Privacy Policy
- Terms of Service
- Contact Tyre Reviews
