2025 Moottori Summer Tyre Test

8 Premium Touring Summer tyres tested in 205/55 R16 |   Published March 14th, 2025 by Jonathan Benson

Finnish magazine Moottori tested eight mid-range summer tyres in size 205/55 R16. They ran the tyres through wet and dry braking tests, handling circuits, aquaplaning resistance, and measured noise levels and rolling resistance. The test showed clear differences in grip levels, with Nokian's Hakka Blue 3 taking the top spot over BF Goodrich Advantage DT1 and Hankook Ventus Prime 4.

Test Publication:
Moottori
Test Size: 205/55 R16
Tyres Tested: 8 tyres
Test Categories:
3 categories (5 tests)
Similar Tests

Test Category Best Performer Worst Performer Difference
Dry (1 tests)
Dry Braking Nokian Hakka Blue 3: 23.18 M Momo Outrun M20 Pro: 25.4 M2.2 M (8.7%)
Wet (3 tests)
Wet Braking Nokian Hakka Blue 3: 24.43 M Momo Outrun M20 Pro: 27.33 M2.9 M (10.6%)
Wet Handling BFGoodrich Advantage: 72.12 s Momo Outrun M20 Pro: 74 s1.9 s (2.5%)
Straight Aqua Fulda EcoControl HP2: 87.2 Km/H Hankook Ventus Prime 4: 83.6 Km/H3.6 Km/H (4.3%)
Comfort (1 tests)
Noise Nokian Hakka Blue 3: 67.9 dB Momo Outrun M20 Pro: 69.2 dB1.3 dB (1.9%)

Below is the data they published, along with a summary for each tyres results.

Dry

Dry Braking

Wet

Wet Braking

Wet Handling

Straight Aqua

Comfort

Noise

Results

1st: Nokian Hakka Blue 3

Nokian Hakka Blue 3
  • 205/55 R16
  • 3PMSF: no
  • Price:
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking1st23.18 M100%
Wet Braking1st24.43 M100%
Wet Handling3rd72.8 s72.12 s+0.68 s99.07%
Straight Aqua4th86.1 Km/H87.2 Km/H-1.1 Km/H98.74%
Noise1st67.9 dB100%
Nokian emerged as the overall test winner with a score of 9.2. The tyre shows excellent grip in both wet and dry conditions, with class-leading braking distances. Particularly strong in aquaplaning resistance, the Hakka Blue 3 also delivered the best braking results on wet surfaces. The tyre remains stable and predictable in all conditions, with good steering response and minimal noise. While not the cheapest option, its balanced performance makes it an ideal choice for safety-conscious drivers.
Read Reviews

2nd: BFGoodrich Advantage

BFGoodrich Advantage
  • 205/55 R16
  • 3PMSF: no
  • Price:
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking3rd23.58 M23.18 M+0.4 M98.3%
Wet Braking3rd25.15 M24.43 M+0.72 M97.14%
Wet Handling1st72.12 s100%
Straight Aqua2nd86.9 Km/H87.2 Km/H-0.3 Km/H99.66%
Noise6th68.8 dB67.9 dB+0.9 dB98.69%
With an overall score of 9.0, BF Goodrich delivered impressive all-round performance. The tyre shows particularly strong handling in wet conditions and good resistance to aquaplaning, making it a safe choice for rainy weather. Its dry grip and steering feedback are also noteworthy, and it maintains good control during emergency maneuvers. The tyre offers reduced rolling resistance, helping with fuel economy. BF Goodrich's background as part of Michelin is evident in the tyre's well-rounded capabilities.
Read Reviews

3rd: Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Hankook Ventus Prime 4
  • 205/55 R16
  • 3PMSF: no
  • Price:
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking2nd23.26 M23.18 M+0.08 M99.66%
Wet Braking2nd24.91 M24.43 M+0.48 M98.07%
Wet Handling2nd72.56 s72.12 s+0.44 s99.39%
Straight Aqua8th83.6 Km/H87.2 Km/H-3.6 Km/H95.87%
Noise3rd68.6 dB67.9 dB+0.7 dB98.98%
Scoring 8.9 overall, the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 offers balanced performance with particular strengths in handling and aquaplaning resistance. In wet testing, the tyre responds quickly and precisely to steering inputs. Braking distances are good in both wet and dry conditions, though not class-leading. While the tyre performs well in most areas, its wet grip at higher speeds falls slightly behind the top performers. The Hankook offers good value with only minor compromises in performance.
Read Reviews    Buy from £73.03

4th: Fulda EcoControl HP2

Fulda EcoControl HP2
  • 205/55 R16
  • 3PMSF: no
  • Price:
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking5th24.33 M23.18 M+1.15 M95.27%
Wet Braking4th25.99 M24.43 M+1.56 M94%
Wet Handling5th73.31 s72.12 s+1.19 s98.38%
Straight Aqua1st87.2 Km/H100%
Noise6th68.8 dB67.9 dB+0.9 dB98.69%
With a score of 8.7, the Fulda Eco Control 2 delivers solid overall performance with an emphasis on fuel efficiency. Its wet braking distances are good, though not quite matching the best tyres in the test. The tyre handles well in most conditions but shows some limitations in aquaplaning resistance compared to top performers. Fulda, with its Goodyear heritage, offers a balanced tyre that's particularly strong in reducing rolling resistance for better fuel economy.
Read Reviews

5th: Yokohama BluEarth GT AE51

Yokohama BluEarth GT AE51
  • 205/55 R16
  • 3PMSF: no
  • Price:
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking4th24 M23.18 M+0.82 M96.58%
Wet Braking5th26.2 M24.43 M+1.77 M93.24%
Wet Handling4th73.18 s72.12 s+1.06 s98.55%
Straight Aqua7th83.7 Km/H87.2 Km/H-3.5 Km/H95.99%
Noise5th68.7 dB67.9 dB+0.8 dB98.84%
The Yokohama scored 8.6 overall, with its standout feature being low rolling resistance for better fuel efficiency. In fact, the test noted that its 3.3% lower rolling resistance compared to Momo could save about two liters of fuel per thousand kilometers. The tyre handles well in most conditions with decent grip levels, though it doesn't match the top performers in wet grip. Noise levels are well controlled, making it a comfortable option for everyday driving.
Read Reviews    Buy from £80.99

6th: Gislaved Ultra Speed 2

Gislaved Ultra Speed 2
  • 205/55 R16
  • 3PMSF: no
  • Price:
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking6th24.47 M23.18 M+1.29 M94.73%
Wet Braking6th26.98 M24.43 M+2.55 M90.55%
Wet Handling7th73.72 s72.12 s+1.6 s97.83%
Straight Aqua5th85.1 Km/H87.2 Km/H-2.1 Km/H97.59%
Noise2nd68.5 dB67.9 dB+0.6 dB99.12%
With a score of 8.4, the Gislaved offers solid performance, particularly in dry conditions and at moderate speeds. Its wet handling is adequate but falls behind the leaders when pushed hard. The tyre provides neutral steering characteristics and predictable behavior, making it user-friendly for everyday drivers. While not excelling in any particular area, it delivers reliable performance across a range of conditions without major weaknesses.
Read Reviews

7th: Barum Bravuris 5HM

Barum Bravuris 5HM
  • 205/55 R16
  • 3PMSF: no
  • Price:
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking7th25.29 M23.18 M+2.11 M91.66%
Wet Braking7th27.25 M24.43 M+2.82 M89.65%
Wet Handling6th73.42 s72.12 s+1.3 s98.23%
Straight Aqua3rd86.7 Km/H87.2 Km/H-0.5 Km/H99.43%
Noise3rd68.6 dB67.9 dB+0.7 dB98.98%
Scoring 8.3 overall, the Barum tyre shows good resistance to aquaplaning but struggles more with wet grip in other situations. Its dry road performance is acceptable but not remarkable. The tyre's handling becomes less precise when pushed hard in wet conditions, though it remains controllable. Manufactured in Slovakia, Barum (part of Continental) offers a budget-friendly option that makes some compromises in outright performance.
Read Reviews

8th: Volkswagen Golf mk5

Volkswagen Golf mk5
  • 205/55 R16
  • 3PMSF: no
  • Price:
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking8th25.4 M23.18 M+2.22 M91.26%
Wet Braking8th27.33 M24.43 M+2.9 M89.39%
Wet Handling8th74 s72.12 s+1.88 s97.46%
Straight Aqua6th84.3 Km/H87.2 Km/H-2.9 Km/H96.67%
Noise8th69.2 dB67.9 dB+1.3 dB98.12%
The Momo scored 8.1, coming in last among the tested tyres. While it offers good comfort and reasonable noise levels, it shows limitations in wet handling and braking distances. The tyre requires more careful handling in wet conditions, with less grip and feedback than competitors. Its strongest point is comfort, making it suitable for drivers who prioritize a smooth ride over ultimate performance. Made in Vietnam, it represents a more budget-friendly option in the test.
Read Reviews

comments powered by Disqus