Bridgestone Turanza T005 Reviews - Page 3

Given 46% while driving a Vauxhall Astra 1.8 sport (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 20,000 average miles
covered 20k miles in 3 years and all 4 tyres are heavily cracked and need to be replaced to pass MOT.

They started to crack after 1 year i was advised at my service of the cracking,
at year 2 service i was again advised of cracking .
And at year 3 service advised all 4 tyres are heavily cracked and need to be replaced.

Tyre report shows 4mm tread leaft after 20k miles so in theory they could have gone another 20k if they didnt crack up so badly that they must be replaced.

i have beem driving since 1995 and have never had 4 tyres all crack up at roughly the same time and same degree in 3 years use.

It has put me off this brand , despite the overall positive reviews these tyres recieve.
Helpful 18 - tyre reviewed on September 7, 2023
Given 99% while driving a BMW 320d efficient dynamics (225/55 R16) on mostly motorways for 40,000 average miles
My BMW 320d came with run flat tires but the driving was very stiff with a lot of noise and vibrations.
I call BMW ans questioned the type of tires that my car came originally.
It was non run flat 225/55/16R, the company that I bought the car paid for 4 new Bridzestone turanza.
I drove he car in weekly basis from Aberdeen to midlands and then from midlands to the south cost.
I drove any condition and time of the day and I never experienced any problem.
I really filled safe in any condition and also on rain and wet.
During the winter I was using winter tires - Michelin alpine since the BMW is dangerous driving on snow with summer tires.
I had only one flat, actually one small screw from one of my garage projects penetrated into the tire, I removed it after hundreds of miles and plug it.
Best tire ever.
I have tested other Bridgestone types in my old E30, michelin, vredestein and others but the specific tire appears flexible, safe, reliable, longlasting, trustworthy.
I was running the tire at the mid and higher pressures even when it was empty.
This is my first review for car tires.
02/09/2023
Helpful 16 - tyre reviewed on September 2, 2023
Given 94% while driving a Nissan almera 1.5 (185/65 R14) on a combination of roads for 2,021 miles
Very good it saved me from a carambola. When my front one came to a sudden stop skidding in heavy rain I braked hard and the tire saved me by stopping without skidding. Excellent, I will put it again for sure
Helpful 21 - tyre reviewed on August 19, 2023
What to know the BEST All Season Tyres for 2024? Click to find out!
Given 83% while driving a Mercedes Benz c 220 cdi (205/55 R16) on mostly motorways for 31,060 average miles
Tyre is very soft it has a good grip on the road handling also on turns, is fuel-efficient, and can run 50 000 km (tested on my car with new Bridgestone Turanza t005 tires 205 55 16). The biggest setback is the soft walls on the tire, they are vulnerable to any road hole or obstacle that will grope on the tire wall. Eventually, it will form a bubble and start to lose pressure from it.
Helpful 22 - tyre reviewed on July 12, 2023
Given 90% while driving a Mazda CX30 (215/65 R16) on mostly country roads for 15,000 spirited miles
Had these on the fronts of a new Mazda and lasted me 15k miles , nearside probably had another 1k miles in them when I changed as a pair. Usually on previous cars driving on same roads I usually only get 11 or 12k miles from other brands such as Michelin, Goodyear etc. But on different cars.
I do feel accassionial rear end slip when turning quickly but that was when they were towards the end of their life with a few millimetres remaining. Strange thing I did notice about when replacing these is that you can buy the same named tyre with completely different tyre data. I've seen A or B in wet, A or B in RR /fuel and between 66 and 70 decibels in road noise? I paid an extra £5 a side, at £111.00 each fitted for the 66 decibel tyre. So should be a lot quieter.
I also purchased these tyres due to good road tests reviews and tyre data of Fuel Efficiency B, Wet Grip A, Noise Rating A-66dB.
But as I mentioned earlier they do come strangley come with same name but different EU tyre labal data.
Helpful 21 - tyre reviewed on July 9, 2023
Given 50% while driving a Audi S3 (225/40 R18) on mostly country roads for 20,000 spirited miles
I can’t believe that these are factory fit on Audi S3 8V. They seem to be well suited to the lower power models with less braking capacity and performance due to getting very good economy and being quiet. However they are not right for a car with 310 bhp, it can break traction easily in the wet on these and in the dry on perfect roads the abs cuts in with only moderate braking. I thought the car might just be a bit too much for tyres but I ran crossclimates over winter and these had better grip in all conditions (even on warm days) and substantially shorter stopping distances. I think these tyres have a place but they don’t shine on more powerful cars, they have been fitted in a smaller size on a company Passat and on that car I don’t really have any complaints, they perform similarly to the Continental EcoContacts that it left the factory with
Helpful 32 - tyre reviewed on May 7, 2023
Given 89% while driving a Suzuki SX4 1.6 LITRE PETROL (205/60 R16) on a combination of roads for 20,000 easy going miles
very nice tyres. I have never had problems with grip or handling (sensible driving mostly). Rolling and fuel consumption were descent too. They generally felt a bit better than my previous michelins. I had to change them at 35000klm due ton unrepearable puncture from a screw, but they were too expensive to buy again. The wear was good enough to go for several months though.
Helpful 18 - tyre reviewed on April 19, 2023
Given 83% while driving a Volkswagen Polo 1.2 (165/70 R14) on a combination of roads for 1,000 spirited miles
Bought these tires as I had a puncture on one of my old fronts. On the old (cheap) tires I noticed poor wet grip, and a general lack of feel from the tires. I applied these tires to the front only, the rears are still some cheap brand. The car has about 60hp, so not a lot of power, however due to lack of TC, it was actually pretty easy to spin the front wheels, even in the dry when starting spiritedly. After applying these tires, it is significantly more difficult to make this happen which is nice. The feel has been greatly improved with these tires, and the grip when going round a bend is noticeably greater. The feedback is enough to be pretty clear of where the limit is. The car feels more bitey and fun to drive. In the wet it's more of the same, I have a lot of faith in the front tires, and haven't found the car understeery at all with them.
Helpful 22 - tyre reviewed on April 14, 2023
Given 84% while driving a Mazda 3 2020 Skyactive X (215/45 R18) on mostly motorways for 5,000 average miles
Tyres I'm reviewing are marked as T005A, which are apparently Asian-specific model of T005 with emphasis on wet performance. They were also the factory tyre on my car. In my opinion they are pretty comfortable for such a low profile tyre, their wet performance seems pretty good (had zero issues with them). The softness goes a bit against the feedback they give from the road, so in the dry they are not the most confidence inspiring tyres. I cannot judge the rolling resistance, as these are the first summer tyres on the car. Currently at 7mm after roughly 5000 miles, but I haven't measured the original tread depth, so we'll see after another summer, how long lasting are they (which according to other reviews is their weak spot).
Helpful 18 - tyre reviewed on April 14, 2023
Given 44% while driving a BMW 218d Active Tourer (255/35 R19) on a combination of roads for 5,500 spirited miles
I had these tyres fitted to my 430i G22 from BMW when I collected the car from them. This tyre behaves in a very strange way. When cold, the tyre doesn't inspire confidence and, especially in the wet, tends to oversteer a lot, not being easy to control. On the other hand, it manages hot temperatures very badly, again loosing grip after 30+°C and making the car understeer a little, but at least they were managable. The real issue i had was the very short lifespan of the rear tyres, complitely gone after 9000km of both normal and spirited driving (never tracked the car, of course). I will never buy this tyre again, and I can advise you to do the same.
Helpful 21 - tyre reviewed on April 7, 2023
Given 51% while driving a Mercedes Benz CLA 250e (225/45 R18) on mostly town for 9,000 average miles
These tires (in the runflat flavour) were fitted by the dealership as an option. Grip wise, the electric torque really makes these tyres struggle, I often find myself having to really be careful about how hard I go on the throttle if I want to be nippy in a junction, as the ESP is also quite trigger happy when not in Sport mode. After that initial couple of feet, however, they have enough grip to accelerate and break without issues. In the wet, the car skids in roundabouts at speeds as low as 20mph. The tires struggle to put the power down, again most likely due to the electric torque. They are quite noisy and (at least the runflat kind) on the stiffer side, so they really contribute to the road feel (in the sense that you'll definitely feel every bump you go over). Otherwise, road feedback is on the average side. After only 8000 miles, the tread seems to be nearing the end of its life. While some sporty driving had happened, it was nowhere near enough to justify the tread being as low as it is. Overall, I am not happy with the way they perform and if I could go back in time I definitely wouldn't get them on my car.
Helpful 22 - tyre reviewed on April 3, 2023
Given 69% while driving a Toyota Corolla AE101 (175/65 R14) on mostly country roads for 3,500 average miles
I have this tyres for 3,500klm, dry road is good but in the wet braking is a little bad. Wear is bad but the comfort is ok. Soft tyres.
Helpful 17 - tyre reviewed on March 19, 2023