“Coming from Finland, a country of winter snow and studs. Have these on two cars - 2007 Focus Cabrio - 1998 996 C2 In most winnter conditions amazing grip level. However, two shortcomings. 1) The modern light studs do...”
Michelin X-Ice North 4
A standout studded Nordic winter tyre that feels almost unbeatable on ice and very strong on snow, while staying impressively civilised for noise. Its compromises show most clearly on wet, bare tarmac and in efficiency.
Michelin's X Ice North 4 is built first and foremost for real winter surfaces, and it delivers: ice performance is consistently class-leading, with excellent braking and traction that inspires confidence on polished junctions and frozen roads. Snow ability is also a strong suit, typically right up with the best studded rivals for traction and often praised for controlled, capable snow handling. For a studded tyre it's also notably refined, with both testers and owners calling out how low the stud noise is on clear pavement.
The recurring caveat is what happens when winter roads turn into wet, bare tarmac. Within the studded class it tends to trail the pack for wet braking and can feel less secure when standing water is involved, with aquaplaning resistance a repeated weak point. On dry/asphalt it generally behaves safely and predictably, but can lean towards understeer and a slower, less precise steering response than the sharpest alternatives. Efficiency is another common trade-off, with rolling resistance frequently criticised. Longevity impressions are broadly positive (including reports of high mileages and good stud retention when properly run in), though a minority mention stud loss or wear catching up in later seasons. It best suits drivers in consistently icy/snowy regions who prioritise maximum winter safety and low stud noise, and who can accept weaker wet-road performance when conditions are mild and wet rather than frozen.
The quick answer
Built from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold for this tyre - the evidence is all further down the page. Data updated November 2026.
- 13owner reviews
- 132,767miles driven
- 13professional tests
All Tests
View Test ResultsTested 13 times by independent publications, the Michelin X Ice North 4 has taken 3 test wins with an average finish of 3rd.
Finishing position in each test
2026 Teknikens Värld Studded, Nordic and Central European Winter Tyre Test P3 of 7Studded Winter Tyres
The Michelin X-Ice North 4 finished third of the seven studded tyres. It is a consistent studded tyre on ice and snow, but its bare-road braking is well short of the best.
| Year | Test | Result | Award |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 2026 Teknikens Värld Studded, Nordic and Central European Winter Tyre TestTeknikens Värld · 235/45 R18 | P3 / 7Studded Winter Tyres | |
| 2026 | 2026 Vi Bilagare Studded Tyre TestVi Bilagare · 215/65 R17 | P3 / 8 | |
| 2025 | 2025 Studded, Friction and European Winter Tyre TestTeknikens Värld · 235/45 R18 | P5 / 8Studded Winter Tyres | |
| 2025 | 2025 Friction and Studded Winter Tyre TestTekniikan Maailma · 205/55 R16 | P4 / 7Studded Winter Tyres | |
| 2024 | 2024 Studded Tyre TestVi Bilagare · 225/45 R17 | P3 / 8 | |
| 2024 | The Best Studded / Friction Winter Tyres for 2024Teknikens Värld · 225/50 R17 | P3 / 6Studded Winter Tyres | |
| 2023 | 2023 Studded Tyre TestVi Bilagare · 225/45 R17 | P2 / 8 | |
| 2021 | 2021 Nordic Studded Winter Tyre TestMoottori · 205/55 R16 | P2 / 8 | |
| 2021 | 2021 Studless and Studded Winter Tyre TestTeknikens Värld · 205/55 R16 | P3 / 9Studded Winter Tyres | |
| 2020 | 2020 Studded Winter Tyre TestVi Bilagare · 205/60 R16 | P1 / 8 | |
| 2020 | The Best Winter Tyres for 2020Tyre Reviews · 205/55 R16 | P1 / 19 | Tested by Tyre Reviews |
| 2020 | 2020 Nordic and Studded Winter Tyre TestTest World · 205/55 R16 | P1 / 6Studded Winter Tyres | |
| 2019 | 2019 Studded Winter Tyre TestVi Bilagare · 225/50 R17 | P2 / 8 |
On the full record: Record by disciplineHead-to-head recordEvery published verdict
Where to buy
Prices for your size at our partner shops.
Affiliate links: we may earn a commission if you buy. It never changes our results.
Videos
10 of the BEST Winter Tires for 2020
Alternative Tyres
View AllDimensions & Label Scores
View AllUS ratingsUTQG grade and the maker's mileage warranty
Not gradedUTQG grade10.5/32"Tread depth (new)
Frequently Asked Questions
How good is the Michelin X-Ice North 4 in the wet?
How good is the Michelin X-Ice North 4 in the dry?
How good is the Michelin X-Ice North 4 in the snow?
How good is the Michelin X-Ice North 4 on ice?
How fuel efficient is the Michelin X-Ice North 4?
More questions about the Michelin X-Ice North 4 (4)
What do owners say about the Michelin X-Ice North 4?
How comfortable and quiet are the Michelin X-Ice North 4?
How well do the Michelin X-Ice North 4 wear, according to owners?
Would owners buy the Michelin X-Ice North 4 again?
Owner Questions
Ask a questionQuestions and Answers for the Michelin X-Ice North 4
Michelin X-Ice North 4 Owner Reviews
Review this tyreWhat owners say summarised from 9 reviews
Drivers rate the Michelin X Ice North 4 very highly overall, most often praising outstanding traction and braking on ice and snow along with impressively low road noise for a studded tyre. Several reviews also highlight confident handling/feedback and generally strong longevity, with some users reporting long tread life and good stud seating after proper break-in. A smaller minority note trade-offs such as weaker grip on wet/dry pavement and occasional stud loss or faster wear later in the tyre's life.
What owners mention most counted across 11 reviews
Tap one to read only the reviews that mention it.
Owner ratings averaged from 13 ratings
- Owner score 84%
- Ice Grip 98%
- Snow Grip 92%
- Wear 88%
- Comfort 82%
- Handling 81%
- Dry Grip 76%
- Road Feedback 75%
- Wet Grip 72%
Featured reviews
“Great tyres, bought new for winter 2021-2022.impressed by the lack of noise from studs on clear pavement. Used them on my WV Passat, and tread life is extremely high, went trough 32 000 miles. The first 25 000 miles...”
All 11 Michelin X-Ice North 4 reviews
- Volkswagen ID4
- 255/50 R19
- 746 miles
I live in the middle parts of Sweden and have been using the Michelin X ice north 4 on my VW ID.4 GTX for one winter. It’s not my first time using these tyres, I had them on my Volvo XC60 before that.
It is a good tyre with good handling in the cold, snow or ice is no problem. It has a lot more studds than typical, giving it a firm grip in winter conditions. But in the dry and wet, early winter and early spring, it struggles. The noice in the dry, especilly on an ev is grueling.
It is not very Eco or efficent as you can notice it gripping on and lacking a bit in rolling.
I’m selling the car and will not buy this tyre for my next car. But if I would buy a new tire for my Scoda Octavia I would by this.
- BMW 328i
- 185/65 R15
- 5,000 miles
Very good on ice - probably one of the very best. But I wouldn't buy them if most of the driving is on wet or dry roads. The amount of studs in them contributes to a great amount of noise, but in return you'll get very good grip on ice. I have used them mostly on ice tracks with 3 different cars and the speed and grip you can get with these is on another level. Probably only comparable to Bridgestone Blizzak Spike 3, but these have longer studs and lose studs easily. Compared to the Blizzaks, straight line grip is not as good, but generally they perform exceptionally well. Have no comparison to newer tyres.
Snow grip is also really good. On dry and wet, feels a little spongy as you would expect from a winter tyre. Haven't really driven them much on the road.
My experience is purely based on RWD cars: 1990 BMW 318i; 1995 BMW 328i; 2004 Smart Roadster. Used the same size with all of them.
- Volkswagen Passat B8 1.8 TSI RLine 180PS
- 215/60 R16
- 32,000 miles
Which tyres do you drive?
Researching the Michelin X-Ice North 4? Rate the tyres you actually drive - and help the next buyer choose.
- Toyota Matrix (Corolla wagon) FWD
- 205/55 R16
- 15 miles
- A Combination of Roads
- Average
- Ford Focus mk2
- 225/45 R18
- 6 miles
- A Combination of Roads
- Average
- 2007 Focus Cabrio
- 1998 996 C2
In most winnter conditions amazing grip level. However, two shortcomings. 1) The modern light studs do not penetrate well if there is loose snow on top of hard snor/icy surface. Obviously this has more to do with regulations rather than the tyre brand and model. 2) These modern silica tyres seem to collect a layer of snow in slow speeds, say below 30..40 km/h . Both these properties make the tyres a bit Jekyll and Hyde. At best it gives enormous amount of grip but then you come on loose snow and you think you are driving very slow - and suddenly you have absolutely no grip. I wish we could still have the longer studs. I can tell it is not nice to get the impression of good grip for some 50 km (0.3 < muu < 0.5) and then in an open place wind has collected snow on the hard snow surface and a deer runs into your lights and you find absolutely no grip at all (like muu = 0.05). Fortunately I had my insurances. I dont think this would have happened with the old style big block, long heavy stud Hakkapeliittas. Those would have not given the level of grip on the 50 km stretch but they would have lost pretty much nothing coming to the loose snow.
What impresses me is the strong stud base. The cavity seems wrapped with a very strong compound and the studs seem to not come off at all. The construction of the tyre seems very good for winter purposes, not too stiff nor too soft side wall. Subjectively I think I would prefer a sharper shoulder but that is more like an image in my head rather than supported by my driving experience.
If I was to develop this tyre I would look into the slow speed attached snow layer phenomenom - perhaps on all the silica tyres. I also would like to try something like raised tread on the lines of studs to get the modern studs penetrate better the loose snow on top of the hard.
I know one problem with the winter tyre testing is that the tracks are always similar to get good comparability. But in real life the surfaces vary much more in winter conditions and a good winter tyre should even the grip levels to predictable. As good as the X-Ice 4 is it is not the most predictable tyre. Fortunately you can learn to predict the places where you will loose the grip. I find this all more of a result of rather compromized regulations than tyre makes development work.
- Ford Focus
- 215/55 R17
- Mostly Town
- Average
- Volkswagen 2019 Golf Variant 1.5 TSI
- 205/55 R16
- 17,000 miles
- A Combination of Roads
- Average
- Audi 80 B4
- 195/60 R15
- 5,000 miles
- A Combination of Roads
- Spirited
- Kia Motors GT limited AWD
- 225/45 R18
- 18,000 miles
- A Combination of Roads
- Spirited
- BMW 520d M Sport
- 245/45 R18
- 20,000 miles
- A Combination of Roads
- Average
- Toyota Corolla E140
- 205/55 R16 T
- A Combination of Roads
- Spirited
No reviews match those filters.
Find your next tyre
All tyre testsThe latest Tyre Reviews tests
- Oct 2026The BEST All Weather Tyres for 2026/27 →
- Oct 2026All Season vs All Terrain Tyres Tested: Do You Actually Need an All Terrain? →
- Oct 2026The BEST Winter Tyres for 2026/27 →
Summer Tyres
All Season Tyres
Winter Tyres
SUV and All Terrain Tyres
Track Tyres
Which tyres do you drive?
You're reading real-world reviews from other drivers - add yours and help the next buyer choose the right tyres.







