Ford F250 Tyres

On this page you will find the best real world tyre reviews from owners of the Ford F250.

Do you Drive a Ford F250? Why not add your own tyre review and help other owners pick the right tyre! After all, who knows what the best tyre for a F250 better than the owners?

Review Your Tyres >>

Tyre Reviewed Dry Grip Wet Grip Feedback Handling Wear Comfort
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate (11) 98% 97% 90% 83% 94% 92%
Nokian Outpost AT (8) 94% 91% 88% 79% 93% 84%
Michelin LTX AT2 (4) 90% 88% 90% 93% 90% 90%
Kumho Road Venture AT51 (4) 83% 73% 75% 73% 70% 80%
General Grabber AT (16) 81% 71% 73% 75% 76% 73%
Hifly VIGOROUS AT601 (16) 77% 70% 64% 63% 51% 61%
Sailun Terramax HT (4) 68% 68% 68% 63% 37% 63%
Toyo Open Country AT II (2) 65% 50% 65% 60% 75% 80%
Maxxis Bighorn MT762 (3) 33% 33% 30% 50% 37% 53%

Ford F250 Tyre Review Highlights

Writing about the General Grabber AT given 53% (325-60-20-)
Driving on mostly motorways for 60 miles
Three dealerships and tire stores have tried to balance them but where unable to also after only thirteen thousand miles they are starting to cup bad have check pressure every two weeks and run them at factory prescribed pressure worst tire i have ever owned will never run generals again
tyre reviewed on 2023-03-31 14:22:49
Writing about the Maxxis Bighorn MT762 given 10% (265-70-17-)
Driving on a combination of roads for 0 easy going miles
I was told by the tire salesman at lpanderson tire billings montana . These tire would be the best for the use I would be putting them through. Totally not true. By far the worst tire I have ever bought I've been driving for 40 plus years. I don't recommend them except for asphalt driving and not really even for that. Waste of money unless I bought 4 tires that had defects in every aspect of a tire. Waste of 1300.00 . I was lied too by the salesman. I don't know if I will go back there I have had good luck with 2 different sets of tires and will diffantly buy those types again. Just thought I would try some new type. Worst idea I've made.
tyre reviewed on 2023-03-29 08:04:35
Writing about the Toyo Open Country AT II given 69% (295-75-20-)
Driving on a combination of roads for 10000 average miles
Overall great looking tire with symmetrical hydro evacuation sidewall edges, tire feels like your never able to warm it up to get that grip/traction of bearing able to follow your line thru the apex of the turn , no real loud road noise seems to work just as good when wet if not better , sidewalls seem a little stiff but I would buy again base off made in USA or Japan
tyre reviewed on 2023-03-20 19:08:47
Writing about the Michelin LTX AT2 given 77% (275-65-20-)
Driving on a combination of roads for 30000 average miles
Tires came stock in my F-250. Great all around, slightly less effective in snow and ice than I would have liked but reasonable. Mine have 30K miles on them and are still around 50%. At the moment I don’t see a better alternative for when I’ll have to change them…
tyre reviewed on 2022-09-13 15:23:39
Writing about the Kumho Road Venture AT51 given 57% (265-65-16-)
Driving on mostly town for 12000 average miles
The current set, we're a claim due to Low milage, less than 30%off milage claim ( km). Achieved 22000 km. Also prone to punctures. Tyres pressure strictly maintained Tyres rotated as and when required NEW Set : currently 12000km and will need to be replaced as they are approaching min legal tread. Usage tar 80%,gravel 20% Tire pressure/ rotation/ and general inspection maintained. Also if not more so prone to pictures. Sorry.... I can only advise STAY well clear of this Tyre.
tyre reviewed on 2022-02-20 04:08:58
Writing about the Nokian Outpost AT given 92% (275-65-20-)
Driving on a combination of roads for 3000 average miles
The tires are an all around in any condition works quite well on dry pavement as well as wet very good in the snow as well as ice don’t do much off road can’t comment, as far as the road noise I’m fine with that giving that type of tread design pretty normal. I’m quite happy with these Outpost AT would highly recommend them.
tyre reviewed on 2022-02-04 13:24:19
Writing about the Michelin Agilis CrossClimate given NAN% (245-75-16-)
Driving on mostly motorways for 0 miles
I installed the Michelin Agilis because the BFG Commercial T/A’s were a little noisy. They were quieter but suffered from excessive sidewall play. I’d turn the wheel and it would be half to 3/4 of a second before the truck started to turn. I initially thought I had driven into major wind the way the truck moved around. I checked pressure just to be sure that wasn’t the issue and they were at 80 psi. I’ve driven 600,000 miles in my life and my trucks always had the L/S. I’ve never experienced a Michelin with as much sidewall play. I have a high performance bmw with Pilot Super Sports as well so I’m a car guy who’s owned nothing but Michelins.
I don’t know what the issue is or was but I went back to the noisy BFG’s.
‘99 F-250, reg cab, long bed, v10 with 260,000 miles. No worn ball joints or ball studs in the front end when tested.
tyre reviewed on 2020-01-13 10:00:26
Writing about the Hifly VIGOROUS AT601 given 71% (225-45-17-)
Driving on mostly town for 45000 average miles
bought in 2015, driven mostly local some 800 mile round trips.only 14000 miles when belt separated causing vibration which was not found at first. then within 200 miles another tire had belt separated.
tyre reviewed on 2018-09-30 08:35:54
Writing about the Hifly VIGOROUS AT601 given 26% (225-85-16-R)
Driving on a combination of roads for 15500 average miles
Worst tires I've ever purchased. After 3000 miles they began to cup. After only 15,500 miles, the sidewalls began to crack badly.
tyre reviewed on 2018-07-12 15:42:03
Writing about the Sailun Terramax HT given 21% (225-85-16-)
Driving on mostly motorways for 5 easy going miles
No comments left
tyre reviewed on 2016-09-08 07:09:51
Drive this car? Why not add your own tyre review and help other owners pick the right tyre