Mercedes Benz CLS 320 Tyres

On this page you will find the best real world tyre reviews from owners of the Mercedes Benz CLS 320.

Do you Drive a Mercedes Benz CLS 320? Why not add your own tyre review and help other owners pick the right tyre! After all, who knows what the best tyre for a CLS 320 better than the owners?

Review Your Tyres >>

Tyre Reviewed Dry Grip Wet Grip Feedback Handling Wear Comfort
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti (113) 94% 84% 89% 88% 84% 85%
Nokian zLine (83) 91% 90% 89% 87% 76% 85%
Barum Bravuris 3HM (66) 88% 83% 82% 80% 87% 84%
Falken ZE914 (99) 89% 81% 84% 80% 82% 81%
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 (181) 88% 86% 81% 81% 79% 86%
Barum Bravuris 2 (127) 85% 78% 79% 71% 75% 80%
Nexen N Fera SU1 (132) 83% 76% 76% 77% 74% 81%
Nankang SV1 Winter Plus (14) 80% 72% 72% 71% 81% 82%
Zeetex HP1000 (12) 79% 71% 76% 65% 79% 75%
Landsail LS588 UHP (94) 80% 73% 69% 66% 75% 79%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 (88) 79% 86% 77% 73% 61% 75%
Continental Sport Contact 2 (229) 85% 75% 76% 72% 61% 66%
Hifly HF805 (61) 75% 61% 64% 64% 55% 64%
Accelera PHI (159) 68% 44% 53% 52% 66% 58%
Runway ENDURO 916 Plus (45) 66% 53% 52% 54% 62% 41%

Mercedes Benz CLS 320 Tyre Review Highlights

Writing about the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 given 87% (245-40-18-W)
Driving on a combination of roads for 25000 spirited miles
Bad points
Tram lines, quite noisy on concrete sections of the M25.

Great points
Predictable, good grip, reasonable feedback. Very good tyre life, at least 25K miles on a heavy, powerful RWD car to 2mm.

These are excellent and are well priced, typically 15-20% less than Michelins.
tyre reviewed on 2019-11-17 10:59:33
Writing about the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 given 87% (245-45-17-V)
Driving on mostly town for 500 spirited miles
No comments left
tyre reviewed on 2019-10-08 09:31:10
Writing about the Vredestein Ultrac Vorti given 96% (275-35-18-W)
Driving on mostly motorways for 13000 spirited miles
I just love these tyres. They are awesome and look so gorgeous on my CLS! The only bad thing about these tyres is that the rear ones are useless after 13K miles on mainly motorway mileage, although the front ones seem to drive 20K more given current thread depth. Overall, I recommend these tyres for a good driving experience. I have just ordered two new rear tyres for my car and don't regret buying these tyres, even if they have worn sooner than expected. By the way, first time when I decided to buy these tyres, I did this based on this page's feedback. Hope my feedback will help to you, that lovely person who is reading it right now :-)
Enjoy your new tyres and don't forget that China is always a lottery, therefore I wouldn't go for Chinese tyres, even if I admit I had a really good experience with LingLong and Uniroyal tyres, but my friends were not so lucky in this respect.
Have a safe drive,
Andrew
tyre reviewed on 2019-01-25 10:34:06
Writing about the Barum Bravuris 3HM given 89% (245-45-17-W)
Driving on a combination of roads for 17000 average miles
My last review of these tyres was in July last year with just over 5k under them. 12k further on and with what looks like at least another 4 or 5k left in them, I'm still mega impressed. Highly, highly recommended. In fact, I was thinking of changing my alloys for wider rears, but because Barum don't make the right tyre size and I don't want to buy any other tyre, I've decided to keep the wheels I've already got.
tyre reviewed on 2018-04-17 16:25:07
Writing about the Landsail LS588 UHP given 94% (245-40-18-W)
Driving on mostly town for 3000 average miles
I don’t usually write products reviews. But this time I was impressed by this product (tyres). The value for money that you get is impressive.
I can’t see no difference in dry and wet with other tyres brands but there is significant difference in snow.
This winter in Ireland we had a lot of snow and I was driving my MB CLS320 in the snow and I had no issue whatsoever. I was amazed that I can still move well in the car with rear-wheel drive and with summer tyers. Previously I had BMW and couldn’t move at all in snow, I also had different tyres that time.
tyre reviewed on 2018-03-03 18:57:45
Writing about the Accelera PHI given 70% (255-30-20-)
Driving on mostly town for 2000 easy going miles
I have been driving with those for over 2k miles and I have nothing really bad to say about them. I am very rarely taking the car to extremities so I can't really say if tyres are grippy or not. I have not felt loss of traction in my daily driving. Of course, tires do slip on hard acceleration, but that I consider normal given the 610nm kicking the rear wheels. Tyres provide average feedback from the road, but that is not a problem for the non-spirited driver like me. Wear is pretty good for, compound is really soft with hard walls (XL rated). They do feel on the noisy side at times, but that is acceptable given their price.

Would totally purchase them again. Best bank for the buck definitely.
tyre reviewed on 2018-02-23 05:37:10
Writing about the Nexen N Fera SU1 given 30% (275-35-18-)
Driving on a combination of roads for 8000 average miles
These tyres come with 7mm tread. They are excellent until theyre down to 5mm. Then they become death traps. I noticed most good reviews on here are after relatively short mileage. Dont risk it.
tyre reviewed on 2018-01-26 12:13:52
Writing about the Barum Bravuris 3HM given 86% (225-45-17-)
Driving on mostly motorways for 6000 miles
Had my car 4 years now in which time it has munched its way through rear sets of Nokian Z lines, and Nexen N'Fera SU1's and Nexen N8000's in under 12 months and I'm a pretty easy going type of driver. I've now put 6k miles under these Barum's without any noticeable reduction in tread depth and no noticeable loss of grip from the Nokians and Nexens. I'm very, very impressed with these Barum tyres and they seem nigh on perfect for a big, powerful and heavy rear drive car like mine and if they continue to grip and wear as well as they have so far, I'll be back with an update in another 6k with even better scores than I've given here.
tyre reviewed on 2017-07-02 14:56:30
Writing about the Nexen N Fera SU1 given 69% (245-45-17-W)
Driving on mostly motorways for 11000 average miles
These are comfortable, quiet and grippy tyres which inspire confidence in both wet and dry conditions, but even with a relatively easy going driving style like mine (I try and eke as many miles out of a tank of fuel as possible), these tyres are just too soft for a heavy car like the Merc CLS and wore out way too quickly for me to ever consider buying them again. I bought them in April last year and they're already almost totally bereft of tread after only 10 months and 11,000 miles. With a deeper tread depth from new, the Nexen N8000's I had on before them seem to be slightly harder wearing and just as comfortable and grippy, but I think I'll give the (allegedly) longer lasting Barum Bravuris 3HM's next time as I just can't be done with the time, trouble and cost of having to replace my tyres every year.
tyre reviewed on 2017-02-02 08:49:51
Writing about the Vredestein Ultrac Vorti given 89% (245-40-18-)
Driving on a combination of roads for 1000 average miles
Purchased these tyres to replace a set of Falken ZIEX914's (had two sets of these on this car). Ive been totally happy with the Falkens apart from one issue with these tyres and that is poor rim-protection for the notoriously easily scuffed 5 spoke alloys on the post 2008 facelifted CLS. After a bit of research I opted for the Vredestein's based on their chunky in built rim protectors. A set of four tyres including fitting came in at a reasonable £460 at my local tyre fitters. First impressions are good. The Vredesteins are a sportier tyre than the Falkens and have a stiffer sidewall that gives a slightly firmer ride - not too firm though and the car is still supremely comfortable on a long journey. The CLS is a big, heavy, powerful car but is surprisingly agile and I have noted sharper handling particularly when cornering with the Vredesteins when compared to the Falkens. Dry grip seems on a par with the Falkens and they are similar with overall quietness - road noise is low apart from on poor quality road surfaces. They seem to be fine in the wet though I have noticed that the traction control cuts in earlier than I would have expected when pulling away sharply on damp surfaces. Wet and dry braking seems fine too - no problems noted thus far. Too early to pass comment on wear yet as Ive only done 1200 miles on them:- Id be surprised though to get significantly better or worse than the 16k Ive consistently had for the rears and 18k for the fronts from previous sets (Falken, Bridgestone and Continental). And yes, the rim-protection is excellent on these tyres - Ive touched the kerb a couple of times already and the extra protection has saved me! Recommended at the price.
tyre reviewed on 2016-12-29 04:13:36
Writing about the Zeetex HP1000 given 78% (245-40-18-)
Driving on mostly motorways for 2000 average miles
PROS:
- quiet
- comfortable ride
- cheap
- protective board
CONS:
- not many, I believe grip is not as hard but nothing major for a normal type of driving

Would buy again. Price-quality ratio is unbeatable.
tyre reviewed on 2016-07-26 06:10:34
Writing about the Nokian zLine given 71% (245-45-17-W)
Driving on mostly motorways for 13 average miles
Great dry grip and decent wet grip, but wear v. poor. I drive quickly-ish on good straight roads (mainly motorways) but I'll be lucky to see 13,000 miles out of a set of rears put on in Feb. last year.
tyre reviewed on 2016-03-14 16:50:02
Drive this car? Why not add your own tyre review and help other owners pick the right tyre