Toyota 4Runner Tyres

On this page you will find the best real world tyre reviews from owners of the Toyota 4Runner.

Do you Drive a Toyota 4Runner? Why not add your own tyre review and help other owners pick the right tyre! After all, who knows what the best tyre for a 4Runner better than the owners?

Review Your Tyres >>

Tyre Reviewed Dry Grip Wet Grip Feedback Handling Wear Comfort
Silverstone AT 117 SPECIAL (14) 89% 80% 74% 80% 82% 84%
Dunlop Grandtrek TG30 (2) 80% 85% 80% 70% 75% 90%
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R3 (14) 72% 74% 71% 70% 63% 88%
Yokohama Geolandar AT S (13) 81% 74% 76% 69% 78% 78%
BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 (34) 83% 66% 70% 72% 85% 72%
Kumho Crugen HT51 (1) 80% 80% 70% 70% 60% 90%
Dunlop Grandtrek AT20 (32) 73% 51% 58% 64% 72% 68%

Toyota 4Runner Tyre Review Highlights

Writing about the Dunlop Grandtrek AT20 given 47% (265-70-17-)
Driving on mostly town for 0 easy going miles
Assumed tires were fine as there was no issues in summer. Seem to be okay on snow but deadly on ice. Don't trust these are all season tires and don't buy them for winter. Unsafe for the road. I spun out 3x on small patches. Had to buy new tires.
tyre reviewed on 2024-12-12 18:21:54
Writing about the BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 given 86% (345-75-16-)
Driving on a combination of roads for 50000 average miles
I had these on my 4Runner for years. Used in all kinds of weather and terrain. Always gave me complete confidence no matter what : snow, wet, dry, pot holes, dirt.... you name it I was confident these tires could handle it. I would buy again. Also, for a snow/all terrain they were reasonably quiet and comfortable and gave good wear. Keep em aired up and rotate and you will get the warranty wear out of them.
tyre reviewed on 2024-11-30 05:44:47
Writing about the Yokohama Geolandar AT S given 21% (285-70-17-)
Driving on mostly country roads for 10000 average miles
Extremely Disappointed with Yokohama Geolandar AT Tyres
I purchased Yokohama Geolandar AT off-road tyres in March, expecting high quality from a reputed brand. However, one month ago, one of the tyres developed large balloons and eventually burst. Despite this clear manufacturing defect, Yokohama refused to honor the warranty, stating that since the tyre had already burst, it wasn't covered.
To make matters worse, another tyre has now developed two balloons, again a clear sign of a defect, yet Yokohama continues to deny responsibility, claiming it’s not a manufacturing issue, even though the tyre is still under warranty.

This experience has been extremely disappointing. It’s not just about poor product quality but also a serious safety concern. Defective tyres like these are a major risk to life, and Yokohama’s refusal to address the issue under warranty is unacceptable. I strongly advise others to think twice before purchasing Yokohama tyres, as the company does not seem to stand behind their product or their warranty
tyre reviewed on 2024-09-16 03:21:26
Writing about the Kumho Crugen HT51 given 73% (265-65-17-)
Driving on mostly country roads for 30000 spirited miles
I've had the Kumho Crugen HT51 for about 30,000 miles on a 4x4 4Runner. I purchased these because in some other tire tests, they were rated close behind one of the top-scoring Michelin Defender LTX/MS, at a much lower price. They seem to be a clone of that tire.

Overall, these tires have provided good dry, wet, snow, and ice traction, and excellent fuel mileage. My 4x4 4Runner with a lift averages over 20mpg. My one complaint would be that the shoulders seem to wear a faster than the center, and they don't have full-depth cipes. Despite having a 60k mile rating, after 25-30k miles, they're already mostly bald on the shoulders and the tires are already losing some snow and ice traction.

One amazingly shocking and unexpected "pro" has been offroad performance and durability. I haven't had a true off-road or all terrain tire, but I've done some moderately intense offroading in these, which they definitely weren't made for. I was terrified, and really just crossing my fingers I didn't get a blow out on some rough high-clearance, 4WD-required jeep roads, like the Lead King Basin and the American Basin. But these tires somehow just kept trucking. I probably just got lucky, but I'm still impressed.

Would I buy these as an offroad tire? No. But if you're planning on doing 95% on-road highway and forest service road driving, and are looking for great dry, wet, snow, and ice traction, and good efficiency, from a budget tire, I would put these near the top of your list.
tyre reviewed on 2024-09-05 14:39:07
Writing about the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R3 given 0% (265-70-17-)
Driving on a combination of roads for 7000 easy going miles
R3 SUV purchased Oct/21. We are mandated winter tires October 1 to April 30. I don’t care how they drive in rain, what they look like or how noisy they are all I care about is severe winter performance. These tires have poor lateral grip and braking and acceleration on hard compact snow is terrible. I don’t know if these tires were not cured properly or just a poor compound. They remind me of bias belt tires from the sixties. I cannot recommend these tires. I have been licensed for 60 years and have driven public transportation and motor coaches for 30 years, several smaller vehicles and motor cycles.
tyre reviewed on 2023-01-05 00:55:21
Writing about the Dunlop Grandtrek TG30 given 66% (235-45-17-)
Driving on mostly country roads for 0 average miles
No comments left
tyre reviewed on 2014-01-11 03:44:06
Writing about the Silverstone AT 117 SPECIAL given 94% (265-75-15-)
Driving on a combination of roads for 7000 spirited miles
Good performance price comfort no noise top tyre highly recommend love them


tyre reviewed on 2013-05-22 08:13:22
Drive this car? Why not add your own tyre review and help other owners pick the right tyre