Dry Braking

Looking at data from nine tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during six dry braking tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 stopped the vehicle in 0.7% less distance than the Falken Azenis FK520.

Best In Dry Braking: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

See how the Dry Braking winner was calculated >>

Dry Handling [s]

Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during three dry handling [s] tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was 0.69% faster around a lap than the Falken Azenis FK520.

Best In Dry Handling [s]: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>

Dry Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during two dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was 0.41% faster around a lap than the Falken Azenis FK520.

Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>

Subj. Dry Handling

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during one subj. dry handling tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 scored 10% more points than the Falken Azenis FK520.

Best In Subj. Dry Handling: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

See how the Subj. Dry Handling winner was calculated >>

Wet Braking

Looking at data from nine tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during seven wet braking tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 stopped the vehicle in 3.88% less distance than the Falken Azenis FK520.

Best In Wet Braking: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

See how the Wet Braking winner was calculated >>

Wet Braking - Concrete

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during one wet braking - concrete tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 stopped the vehicle in 5.04% less distance than the Falken Azenis FK520.

Best In Wet Braking - Concrete: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

See how the Wet Braking - Concrete winner was calculated >>

Wet Handling [s]

Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during two wet handling [s] tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was 1.38% faster around a wet lap than the Falken Azenis FK520.

Best In Wet Handling [s]: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>

Wet Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during three wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was 2.74% faster around a wet lap than the Falken Azenis FK520.

Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>

Subj. Wet Handling

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Falken Azenis FK520 and Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 performed equally well in subj. wet handling tests.

Best In Subj. Wet Handling: Both tyres performed equally well

See how the Subj. Wet Handling winner was calculated >>

Wet Circle

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during one wet circle tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 had 2.58% higher lateral wet grip than the Falken Azenis FK520.

Best In Wet Circle: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

See how the Wet Circle winner was calculated >>

Straight Aqua

Looking at data from eight tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during six straight aqua tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 floated at a 0.97% higher speed than the Falken Azenis FK520.

Best In Straight Aqua: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

See how the Straight Aqua winner was calculated >>

Curved Aquaplaning

Looking at data from six tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during four curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 slipped out at a 5.73% higher speed than the Falken Azenis FK520.

Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

See how the Curved Aquaplaning winner was calculated >>

Gravel Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Falken Azenis FK520 was better during one gravel handling [km/h] tests. On average the Falken Azenis FK520 was 0.82% faster around a lap than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.

Best In Gravel Handling [Km/H]: Falken Azenis FK520

See how the Gravel Handling winner was calculated >>

Gravel Traction

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Falken Azenis FK520 was better during one gravel traction tests. On average the Falken Azenis FK520 had 1.61% better traction on gravel than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.

Best In Gravel Traction: Falken Azenis FK520

See how the Gravel Traction winner was calculated >>

Sand Traction

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Falken Azenis FK520 was better during one sand traction tests. On average the Falken Azenis FK520 had 3.08% better traction in sand than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.

Best In Sand Traction: Falken Azenis FK520

See how the Sand Traction winner was calculated >>

Grass Tractoin

Best In Grass Tractoin: Falken Azenis FK520

See how the Grass Tractoin winner was calculated >>

Subj. Comfort

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Falken Azenis FK520 was better during one subj. comfort tests. On average the Falken Azenis FK520 scored 5.71% more points than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.

Best In Subj. Comfort: Falken Azenis FK520

See how the Subj. Comfort winner was calculated >>

Noise

Looking at data from eight tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during six noise tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 measured 0.76% quieter than the Falken Azenis FK520.

Best In Noise: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

See how the Noise winner was calculated >>

Wear

Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during three wear tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 is predicted to cover 19.82% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Falken Azenis FK520.

Best In Wear: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

See how the Wear winner was calculated >>

Value

Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during two value tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 proved to have a 8.87% better value based on price/1000km than the Falken Azenis FK520.

Best In Value: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

See how the Value winner was calculated >>

Price

Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Falken Azenis FK520 was better during four price tests. On average the Falken Azenis FK520 cost 11.61% less than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.

Best In Price: Falken Azenis FK520

See how the Price winner was calculated >>

Rolling Resistance

Looking at data from seven tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during six rolling resistance tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 had a 2.01% lower rolling resistance than the Falken Azenis FK520.

Best In Rolling Resistance: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

See how the Rolling Resistance winner was calculated >>

Fuel Consumption

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Falken Azenis FK520 and Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 performed equally well in fuel consumption tests.

Best In Fuel Consumption: Both tyres performed equally well

See how the Fuel Consumption winner was calculated >>

Abrasion

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Falken Azenis FK520 was better during one abrasion tests. On average the Falken Azenis FK520 emitted 16.58% less particle wear matter than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.

Best In Abrasion: Falken Azenis FK520

See how the Abrasion winner was calculated >>