Dry Braking

Looking at data from five tyre tests, the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro was better during three dry braking tests. On average the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro stopped the vehicle in 0.67% less distance than the Hankook Winter i cept evo3.

Best In Dry Braking: Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro

See how the Dry Braking winner was calculated >>

Dry Handling [s]

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro was better during one dry handling [s] tests. On average the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro was 0.6% faster around a lap than the Hankook Winter i cept evo3.

Best In Dry Handling [s]: Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro

See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>

Dry Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro and Hankook Winter i cept evo3 performed equally well in dry handling [km/h] tests.

Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Both tyres performed equally well

See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>

Subj. Dry Handling

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro was better during zero subj. dry handling tests. On average the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro scored 3.06% more points than the Hankook Winter i cept evo3.

Best In Subj. Dry Handling: Hankook Winter i cept evo3

See how the Subj. Dry Handling winner was calculated >>

Wet Braking

Looking at data from six tyre tests, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was better during four wet braking tests. On average the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 stopped the vehicle in 1.7% less distance than the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro.

Best In Wet Braking: Hankook Winter i cept evo3

See how the Wet Braking winner was calculated >>

Wet Handling [s]

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro was better during one wet handling [s] tests. On average the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro was 0.31% faster around a wet lap than the Hankook Winter i cept evo3.

Best In Wet Handling [s]: Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro

See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>

Wet Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro was better during one wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro was 0.02% faster around a wet lap than the Hankook Winter i cept evo3.

Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro

See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>

Subj. Wet Handling

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro and Hankook Winter i cept evo3 performed equally well in subj. wet handling tests.

Best In Subj. Wet Handling: Both tyres performed equally well

See how the Subj. Wet Handling winner was calculated >>

Wet Circle

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro was better during one wet circle tests. On average the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro had 1.76% higher lateral wet grip than the Hankook Winter i cept evo3.

Best In Wet Circle: Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro

See how the Wet Circle winner was calculated >>

Straight Aqua

Looking at data from five tyre tests, the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro was better during one straight aqua tests. On average the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro floated at a 4.8% higher speed than the Hankook Winter i cept evo3.

Best In Straight Aqua: Hankook Winter i cept evo3

See how the Straight Aqua winner was calculated >>

Curved Aquaplaning

Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro was better during zero curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro slipped out at a 23.47% higher speed than the Hankook Winter i cept evo3.

Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Hankook Winter i cept evo3

See how the Curved Aquaplaning winner was calculated >>

Snow Braking

Looking at data from six tyre tests, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was better during six snow braking tests. On average the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 stopped the vehicle in 4.58% less distance than the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro.

Best In Snow Braking: Hankook Winter i cept evo3

See how the Snow Braking winner was calculated >>

Snow Traction

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was better during one snow traction tests. On average the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 accelerated 8.13% faster than the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro.

Best In Snow Traction: Hankook Winter i cept evo3

See how the Snow Traction winner was calculated >>

Snow Traction

Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro was better during one snow traction tests. On average the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro had 5.25% better snow traction than the Hankook Winter i cept evo3.

Best In Snow Traction: Hankook Winter i cept evo3

See how the Snow Traction winner was calculated >>

Snow Handling [s]

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was better during one snow handling [s] tests. On average the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was 5.98% faster around a lap than the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro.

Best In Snow Handling [s]: Hankook Winter i cept evo3

See how the Snow Handling winner was calculated >>

Snow Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro was better during zero snow handling [km/h] tests. On average the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro was 3.13% faster around a lap than the Hankook Winter i cept evo3.

Best In Snow Handling [Km/H]: Hankook Winter i cept evo3

See how the Snow Handling winner was calculated >>

Subj. Snow Handling

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro was better during zero subj. snow handling tests. On average the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro scored 5.26% more points than the Hankook Winter i cept evo3.

Best In Subj. Snow Handling: Hankook Winter i cept evo3

See how the Subj. Snow Handling winner was calculated >>

Snow Slalom

Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro was better during one snow slalom tests. On average the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro was 5.77% faster through a slalom than the Hankook Winter i cept evo3.

Best In Snow Slalom: Hankook Winter i cept evo3

See how the Snow Slalom winner was calculated >>

Subj. Comfort

Best In Subj. Comfort: Hankook Winter i cept evo3

See how the Subj. Comfort winner was calculated >>

Noise

Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro was better during four noise tests. On average the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro measured 1.76% quieter than the Hankook Winter i cept evo3.

Best In Noise: Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro

See how the Noise winner was calculated >>

Wear

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro was better during zero wear tests. On average the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro is predicted to cover 14.16% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Hankook Winter i cept evo3.

Best In Wear: Hankook Winter i cept evo3

See how the Wear winner was calculated >>

Value

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was better during one value tests. On average the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 proved to have a 9.04% better value based on price/1000km than the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro.

Best In Value: Hankook Winter i cept evo3

See how the Value winner was calculated >>

Price

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was better during one price tests. On average the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 cost 1.78% less than the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro.

Best In Price: Hankook Winter i cept evo3

See how the Price winner was calculated >>

Rolling Resistance

Looking at data from five tyre tests, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was better during four rolling resistance tests. On average the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 had a 4.95% lower rolling resistance than the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro.

Best In Rolling Resistance: Hankook Winter i cept evo3

See how the Rolling Resistance winner was calculated >>