Dry Braking

Looking at data from eleven tyre tests, the Vredestein Wintrac Pro was better during six dry braking tests. On average the Vredestein Wintrac Pro stopped the vehicle in 0.25% less distance than the Hankook Winter i cept evo3.

Best In Dry Braking: Vredestein Wintrac Pro

See how the Dry Braking winner was calculated >>

Dry Handling [s]

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was better during one dry handling [s] tests. On average the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was 0.02% faster around a lap than the Vredestein Wintrac Pro.

Best In Dry Handling [s]: Hankook Winter i cept evo3

See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>

Dry Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from nine tyre tests, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was better during eight dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was 0.46% faster around a lap than the Vredestein Wintrac Pro.

Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Hankook Winter i cept evo3

See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>

Subj. Dry Handling

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was better during one subj. dry handling tests. On average the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 scored 2.79% more points than the Vredestein Wintrac Pro.

Best In Subj. Dry Handling: Hankook Winter i cept evo3

See how the Subj. Dry Handling winner was calculated >>

Wet Braking

Looking at data from fourteen tyre tests, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was better during eleven wet braking tests. On average the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 stopped the vehicle in 2.26% less distance than the Vredestein Wintrac Pro.

Best In Wet Braking: Hankook Winter i cept evo3

See how the Wet Braking winner was calculated >>

Wet Braking - Cool

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Vredestein Wintrac Pro was better during one wet braking - cool tests. On average the Vredestein Wintrac Pro stopped the vehicle in 3.95% less distance than the Hankook Winter i cept evo3.

Best In Wet Braking - Cool: Vredestein Wintrac Pro

See how the Wet Braking - Cool winner was calculated >>

Wet Braking - Worn

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Vredestein Wintrac Pro was better during one wet braking - worn tests. On average the Vredestein Wintrac Pro stopped the vehicle in 4.91% less distance than the Hankook Winter i cept evo3.

Best In Wet Braking - Worn: Vredestein Wintrac Pro

See how the Wet Braking - Worn winner was calculated >>

Wet Handling [s]

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Vredestein Wintrac Pro was better during one wet handling [s] tests. On average the Vredestein Wintrac Pro was 0.03% faster around a wet lap than the Hankook Winter i cept evo3.

Best In Wet Handling [s]: Vredestein Wintrac Pro

See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>

Wet Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from nine tyre tests, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was better during five wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was 0.09% faster around a wet lap than the Vredestein Wintrac Pro.

Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Vredestein Wintrac Pro

See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>

Subj. Wet Handling

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was better during one subj. wet handling tests. On average the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 scored 5.61% more points than the Vredestein Wintrac Pro.

Best In Subj. Wet Handling: Hankook Winter i cept evo3

See how the Subj. Wet Handling winner was calculated >>

Wet Circle

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was better during zero wet circle tests. On average the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 had 2.16% higher lateral wet grip than the Vredestein Wintrac Pro.

Best In Wet Circle: Vredestein Wintrac Pro

See how the Wet Circle winner was calculated >>

Straight Aqua

Looking at data from eleven tyre tests, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was better during ten straight aqua tests. On average the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 floated at a 2.6% higher speed than the Vredestein Wintrac Pro.

Best In Straight Aqua: Hankook Winter i cept evo3

See how the Straight Aqua winner was calculated >>

Curved Aquaplaning

Looking at data from nine tyre tests, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was better during eight curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 slipped out at a 12.61% higher speed than the Vredestein Wintrac Pro.

Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Hankook Winter i cept evo3

See how the Curved Aquaplaning winner was calculated >>

Snow Braking

Looking at data from fourteen tyre tests, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was better during nine snow braking tests. On average the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 stopped the vehicle in 0.79% less distance than the Vredestein Wintrac Pro.

Best In Snow Braking: Hankook Winter i cept evo3

See how the Snow Braking winner was calculated >>

Snow Traction

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was better during two snow traction tests. On average the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 accelerated 5.16% faster than the Vredestein Wintrac Pro.

Best In Snow Traction: Hankook Winter i cept evo3

See how the Snow Traction winner was calculated >>

Snow Traction

Looking at data from nine tyre tests, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was better during five snow traction tests. On average the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 had 0.03% better snow traction than the Vredestein Wintrac Pro.

Best In Snow Traction: Hankook Winter i cept evo3

See how the Snow Traction winner was calculated >>

Snow Handling [s]

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was better during two snow handling [s] tests. On average the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was 1.87% faster around a lap than the Vredestein Wintrac Pro.

Best In Snow Handling [s]: Hankook Winter i cept evo3

See how the Snow Handling winner was calculated >>

Snow Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from nine tyre tests, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was better during five snow handling [km/h] tests. On average the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was 0.19% faster around a lap than the Vredestein Wintrac Pro.

Best In Snow Handling [Km/H]: Vredestein Wintrac Pro

See how the Snow Handling winner was calculated >>

Subj. Snow Handling

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was better during one subj. snow handling tests. On average the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 scored 0.19% more points than the Vredestein Wintrac Pro.

Best In Subj. Snow Handling: Hankook Winter i cept evo3

See how the Subj. Snow Handling winner was calculated >>

Snow Circle

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was better during zero snow circle tests. On average the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 provided 2.06% more lateral grip than the Vredestein Wintrac Pro.

Best In Snow Circle: Vredestein Wintrac Pro

See how the Snow Circle winner was calculated >>

Snow Slalom

Looking at data from seven tyre tests, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was better during five snow slalom tests. On average the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was 0.6% faster through a slalom than the Vredestein Wintrac Pro.

Best In Snow Slalom: Hankook Winter i cept evo3

See how the Snow Slalom winner was calculated >>

Subj. Comfort

Best In Subj. Comfort: Hankook Winter i cept evo3

See how the Subj. Comfort winner was calculated >>

Noise

Looking at data from ten tyre tests, the Vredestein Wintrac Pro was better during nine noise tests. On average the Vredestein Wintrac Pro measured 1.79% quieter than the Hankook Winter i cept evo3.

Best In Noise: Vredestein Wintrac Pro

See how the Noise winner was calculated >>

Wear

Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was better during one wear tests. On average the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 is predicted to cover 2.05% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Vredestein Wintrac Pro.

Best In Wear: Vredestein Wintrac Pro

See how the Wear winner was calculated >>

Value

Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was better during two value tests. On average the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 proved to have a 8.11% better value based on price/1000km than the Vredestein Wintrac Pro.

Best In Value: Hankook Winter i cept evo3

See how the Value winner was calculated >>

Price

Looking at data from six tyre tests, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was better during five price tests. On average the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 cost 5.19% less than the Vredestein Wintrac Pro.

Best In Price: Hankook Winter i cept evo3

See how the Price winner was calculated >>

Rolling Resistance

Looking at data from eleven tyre tests, the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 was better during eight rolling resistance tests. On average the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 had a 5.2% lower rolling resistance than the Vredestein Wintrac Pro.

Best In Rolling Resistance: Hankook Winter i cept evo3

See how the Rolling Resistance winner was calculated >>