Dry Braking

Looking at data from nine tyre tests, the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 was better during seven dry braking tests. On average the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 stopped the vehicle in 1.62% less distance than the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2.

Best In Dry Braking: Hankook Ventus Prime 4

See how the Dry Braking winner was calculated >>

Dry Handling [s]

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 was better during one dry handling [s] tests. On average the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 was 0.39% faster around a lap than the Hankook Ventus Prime 4.

Best In Dry Handling [s]: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2

See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>

Dry Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 was better during one dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 was 0.34% faster around a lap than the Hankook Ventus Prime 4.

Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Hankook Ventus Prime 4

See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>

Subj. Dry Handling

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 and Hankook Ventus Prime 4 performed equally well in subj. dry handling tests.

Best In Subj. Dry Handling: Both tyres performed equally well

See how the Subj. Dry Handling winner was calculated >>

Wet Braking

Looking at data from nine tyre tests, the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 was better during nine wet braking tests. On average the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 stopped the vehicle in 4.25% less distance than the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2.

Best In Wet Braking: Hankook Ventus Prime 4

See how the Wet Braking winner was calculated >>

Wet Braking - Concrete

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 was better during one wet braking - concrete tests. On average the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 stopped the vehicle in 0.4% less distance than the Hankook Ventus Prime 4.

Best In Wet Braking - Concrete: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2

See how the Wet Braking - Concrete winner was calculated >>

Wet Handling [s]

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 was better during two wet handling [s] tests. On average the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 was 2.62% faster around a wet lap than the Hankook Ventus Prime 4.

Best In Wet Handling [s]: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2

See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>

Wet Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 was better during zero wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 was 0.22% faster around a wet lap than the Hankook Ventus Prime 4.

Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Hankook Ventus Prime 4

See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>

Subj. Wet Handling

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 and Hankook Ventus Prime 4 performed equally well in subj. wet handling tests.

Best In Subj. Wet Handling: Both tyres performed equally well

See how the Subj. Wet Handling winner was calculated >>

Wet Circle

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 was better during one wet circle tests. On average the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 was 1.2% faster around a wet circle than the Hankook Ventus Prime 4.

Best In Wet Circle: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2

See how the Wet Circle winner was calculated >>

Straight Aqua

Looking at data from seven tyre tests, the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 was better during four straight aqua tests. On average the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 floated at a 0.56% higher speed than the Hankook Ventus Prime 4.

Best In Straight Aqua: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2

See how the Straight Aqua winner was calculated >>

Curved Aquaplaning

Looking at data from six tyre tests, the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 was better during six curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 slipped out at a 7.65% higher speed than the Hankook Ventus Prime 4.

Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2

See how the Curved Aquaplaning winner was calculated >>

Subj. Comfort

Best In Subj. Comfort: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2

See how the Subj. Comfort winner was calculated >>

Noise

Looking at data from seven tyre tests, the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 was better during five noise tests. On average the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 measured 0.98% quieter than the Hankook Ventus Prime 4.

Best In Noise: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2

See how the Noise winner was calculated >>

Tyre Weight

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 was better during one tyre weight tests. On average the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 weighed 8.79% less than the Hankook Ventus Prime 4.

Best In Tyre Weight: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2

See how the Tyre Weight winner was calculated >>

Wear

Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 was better during four wear tests. On average the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 is predicted to cover 31.13% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Hankook Ventus Prime 4.

Best In Wear: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2

See how the Wear winner was calculated >>

Value

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 was better during one value tests. On average the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 has a 12.27% better value based on dollars per 1000 warranted miles than the Hankook Ventus Prime 4.

Best In Value: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2

See how the Value winner was calculated >>

Price

Looking at data from six tyre tests, the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 was better during six price tests. On average the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 cost 8.49% less than the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2.

Best In Price: Hankook Ventus Prime 4

See how the Price winner was calculated >>

Rolling Resistance

Looking at data from five tyre tests, the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 was better during five rolling resistance tests. On average the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 had a 3.69% lower rolling resistance than the Hankook Ventus Prime 4.

Best In Rolling Resistance: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2

See how the Rolling Resistance winner was calculated >>

Fuel Consumption

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 and Hankook Ventus Prime 4 performed equally well in fuel consumption tests.

Best In Fuel Consumption: Both tyres performed equally well

See how the Fuel Consumption winner was calculated >>

Abrasion

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 was better during two abrasion tests. On average the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 emitted 10.37% less particle wear matter than the Hankook Ventus Prime 4.

Best In Abrasion: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2

See how the Abrasion winner was calculated >>