Dry Braking

Looking at data from nine tyre tests, the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 was better during eight dry braking tests. On average the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 stopped the vehicle in 1.38% less distance than the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun.

Best In Dry Braking: Hankook Ventus Prime 4

See how the Dry Braking winner was calculated >>

Dry Handling [s]

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 was better during one dry handling [s] tests. On average the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 was 0.5% faster around a lap than the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun.

Best In Dry Handling [s]: Hankook Ventus Prime 4

See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>

Dry Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun and Hankook Ventus Prime 4 performed equally well in dry handling [km/h] tests.

Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Both tyres performed equally well

See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>

Subj. Dry Handling

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun and Hankook Ventus Prime 4 performed equally well in subj. dry handling tests.

Best In Subj. Dry Handling: Both tyres performed equally well

See how the Subj. Dry Handling winner was calculated >>

Wet Braking

Looking at data from nine tyre tests, the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 was better during seven wet braking tests. On average the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 stopped the vehicle in 0.63% less distance than the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun.

Best In Wet Braking: Hankook Ventus Prime 4

See how the Wet Braking winner was calculated >>

Wet Braking - Concrete

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun was better during one wet braking - concrete tests. On average the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun stopped the vehicle in 3.35% less distance than the Hankook Ventus Prime 4.

Best In Wet Braking - Concrete: Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

See how the Wet Braking - Concrete winner was calculated >>

Wet Handling [s]

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 was better during one wet handling [s] tests. On average the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 was 0.13% faster around a wet lap than the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun.

Best In Wet Handling [s]: Hankook Ventus Prime 4

See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>

Wet Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 was better during three wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 was 0.7% faster around a wet lap than the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun.

Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Hankook Ventus Prime 4

See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>

Subj. Wet Handling

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun and Hankook Ventus Prime 4 performed equally well in subj. wet handling tests.

Best In Subj. Wet Handling: Both tyres performed equally well

See how the Subj. Wet Handling winner was calculated >>

Wet Circle

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 was better during one wet circle tests. On average the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 was 0.83% faster around a wet circle than the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun.

Best In Wet Circle: Hankook Ventus Prime 4

See how the Wet Circle winner was calculated >>

Straight Aqua

Looking at data from seven tyre tests, the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun was better during seven straight aqua tests. On average the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun floated at a 3.62% higher speed than the Hankook Ventus Prime 4.

Best In Straight Aqua: Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

See how the Straight Aqua winner was calculated >>

Curved Aquaplaning

Looking at data from seven tyre tests, the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun was better during seven curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun slipped out at a 9.78% higher speed than the Hankook Ventus Prime 4.

Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

See how the Curved Aquaplaning winner was calculated >>

Gravel Traction

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun was better during one gravel traction tests. On average the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun had 4.23% better traction on gravel than the Hankook Ventus Prime 4.

Best In Gravel Traction: Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

See how the Gravel Traction winner was calculated >>

Dirt Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 was better during one dirt handling [km/h] tests. On average the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 was 0.15% faster around a lap than the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun.

Best In Dirt Handling [Km/H]: Hankook Ventus Prime 4

See how the Dirt Handling winner was calculated >>

Sand Traction

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun was better during one sand traction tests. On average the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun had 1.4% better traction in sand than the Hankook Ventus Prime 4.

Best In Sand Traction: Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

See how the Sand Traction winner was calculated >>

Grass Traction

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun was better during one grass traction tests. On average the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun had 0.37% better traction on grass than the Hankook Ventus Prime 4.

Best In Grass Traction: Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

See how the Grass Traction winner was calculated >>

Mud Traction

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun was better during one mud traction tests. On average the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun had 2.33% better traction in mud than the Hankook Ventus Prime 4.

Best In Mud Traction: Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

See how the Mud Traction winner was calculated >>

Subj. Comfort

Best In Subj. Comfort: Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

See how the Subj. Comfort winner was calculated >>

Noise

Looking at data from seven tyre tests, the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun was better during four noise tests. On average the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun measured 0.25% quieter than the Hankook Ventus Prime 4.

Best In Noise: Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

See how the Noise winner was calculated >>

Tyre Weight

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun was better during one tyre weight tests. On average the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun weighed 1.1% less than the Hankook Ventus Prime 4.

Best In Tyre Weight: Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

See how the Tyre Weight winner was calculated >>

Wear

Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 was better during four wear tests. On average the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 is predicted to cover 6.84% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun.

Best In Wear: Hankook Ventus Prime 4

See how the Wear winner was calculated >>

Value

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 was better during one value tests. On average the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 has a 2.81% better value based on dollars per 1000 warranted miles than the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun.

Best In Value: Hankook Ventus Prime 4

See how the Value winner was calculated >>

Price

Looking at data from six tyre tests, the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun was better during three price tests. On average the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun cost 4.16% less than the Hankook Ventus Prime 4.

Best In Price: Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

See how the Price winner was calculated >>

Rolling Resistance

Looking at data from five tyre tests, the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 was better during four rolling resistance tests. On average the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 had a 8.28% lower rolling resistance than the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun.

Best In Rolling Resistance: Hankook Ventus Prime 4

See how the Rolling Resistance winner was calculated >>

Fuel Consumption

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 was better during two fuel consumption tests. On average the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 used 3.36% less fuel than the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun.

Best In Fuel Consumption: Hankook Ventus Prime 4

See how the Fuel Consumption winner was calculated >>

Abrasion

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 was better during two abrasion tests. On average the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 emitted 14.49% less particle wear matter than the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun.

Best In Abrasion: Hankook Ventus Prime 4

See how the Abrasion winner was calculated >>