285/35 R19 Tyres

The following tyres have been reviewed in 285/35 R19.

Review Your Tyres >>

Tyre Reviewed Dry Grip Wet Grip Feedback Handling Wear Comfort
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti (112) 94% 84% 90% 88% 84% 85%
Michelin Pilot Super Sport (145) 94% 84% 89% 86% 82% 81%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S (138) 93% 88% 86% 87% 81% 86%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 (322) 91% 88% 81% 84% 73% 78%
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric (141) 90% 87% 82% 78% 70% 80%
Hankook Ventus V12 evo k110 (114) 84% 75% 76% 78% 74% 79%
Michelin Primacy 3 (191) 85% 79% 76% 77% 69% 80%
Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 (14) 83% 68% 80% 82% 63% 75%
Pirelli P Zero Corsa Asimmetrico 2 (4) 100% 50% 90% 98% 35% 83%
Michelin Diamaris (3) 83% 70% 77% 73% 53% 80%
Nitto Invo (19) 79% 67% 73% 75% 65% 67%
Goodyear Eagle F1 Supercar (1) 70% 40% 80% 70% 70% 60%
Accelera PHI 2 (12) 71% 49% 54% 52% 65% 62%

285/35 19 Tyre Review Highlights

Pirelli P Zero Corsa Asimmetrico 2 rated 89% while driving a Alfa Romeo Giulia QF
Driving on a combination of roads for 0 spirited miles
Amazing grip, responsiveness. I just couldn't believe the immense grip that I can play with. I am sold with these two features. Regarding wet grip and handling not bad at all if there is a temperature in the tyre.
I tried to drift a little with a bold tyre during the winter in wet conditions, I became a passenger in my Giulia Quad :D
It's an amazing tyre for the summer.
The fronts lasted for 13k miles, the rears could last 3k miles or 9k miles depends on your driving style.
tyre reviewed on 2024-09-09 15:05:00
Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 rated 49% while driving a Ford Mustang gt
Driving on mostly town for 4000 easy going miles
I thought buying a big name brand I'd be getting a tire that would last more than 4000 miles. The rears are almost down to the indicator. These are on a mustang which has been babied since I got it,no burnout,no linelocks. Just normal driving. They are also horrible in the rain to the point that 40mph is all I will go on wet surface. The car is all over and it's not because it needs an alignment. Definitely will not buy again.
tyre reviewed on 2023-06-27 14:44:00
Michelin Primacy 3 rated 79% while driving a BMW 520d M Sport
Driving on mostly town for 0 spirited miles
No comments left
tyre reviewed on 2022-07-29 22:47:11
Accelera PHI 2 rated 70% while driving a Mercedes Benz SL350
Driving on mostly country roads for 12000 spirited miles
Came with a SL350 with 317 bhp and rear wheel drive, bought in July 2021. So I have been through all four seasons of the UK and not really had any concerns. I was a little worried about the winter with these tyres having read the reviews here. I have had lot of mid-high power cars and always bought premium tyres. Unfortunately something is not right on car, likely it is just the 4 wheel alignment which has caused excessive inner wear on the rears. Resulting in an MOT failure and urgent purchase of two tyres to pass the MOT. I saw no point in paying for premium tyres until the set up of the car/alignment is corrected. So I bought two more of these Accelera. Apart from the wear on the extreme inner of the tyres the rest of the tread across all four is still very good and looks set to last more than another year with ease. What can I say, £90 vs £200-£300 a corner. My last two cars were £350 a corner. I can honestly say that the premium tyres are NOT £200 better at all. Within the local Porsche club I have a reputation for being one of the fastest drivers, competing even against GT3s, GT2s, Turbo and Turbo S 911s. Do I think these tyres are as bad as some people say here. Not at all. Do I drive the SL350 like I do the 911 on the track, no not at all. I've had a couple of moments of lost traction on these tyres, but nothing that was not immediately corrected by the car and nothing that has ever given me cause for concern. I have had far worse experiences with premium tyres on the 911 at £350 a corner than the Accelera have ever caused. Definitely worth the money. Are conti sport contacts/bridgestone potenza S1 worth so much more. I do not think so. Are the premium tyres better, yes undoubtedly, but not worth three times the price.
tyre reviewed on 2022-06-29 11:26:00
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 rated 67% while driving a Nissan 370Z
Driving on a combination of roads for 3000 spirited miles
No comments left
tyre reviewed on 2020-05-02 11:04:37
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S rated 89% while driving a BMW M3
Driving on a combination of roads for 500 spirited miles
No comments left
tyre reviewed on 2019-03-10 12:44:05
Nitto Invo rated 61% while driving a Ford Mustang gt
Driving on mostly country roads for 18000 average miles
I'll try another brand next time, for me it is not worth its value(Nitto Invo).
I have tried (Nitto 555) previously, it was better than (Invo).
tyre reviewed on 2018-03-07 04:33:07
Hankook Ventus V12 evo k110 rated 86% while driving a Chrysler Crossfire
Driving on mostly country roads for 90000 spirited miles
No, I did not get 90,000 miles from these. Well, I did, that that was five sets of them. I guess you could say I like these tires. In the wide size my car uses, they tend to get a bit skiddish on wet roads. I do NOT want to hit standing water in the road - but that's largely a function of the wide tire size on my car and not necessarily an indication of a poor tire.

If I drive VERY mildly, I can get 33,000 miles from a set. In fact, my first set lasted 33,000. But these days, I drive the car like a sports car and with all the curves in the Smoky Mountains (USA) I get around 15,000 a set. They really do handle the curves well for a mid-priced tire.

My car is a convertible and the best part about these tires is how QUIET they stay. I've ran at least three sets down to slick and they just don't make any noise. There are better tires, but I don't believe I have the driving skill to require better tires - even well above the speed limit on curvy mountain roads. My point: If you are the average driver, these tires will be fine. If you are a bit spirited behind the wheel, try a set. If you are a real pro and drive a sporty car - I'd bet you wo'nt find them to your standards.
tyre reviewed on 2017-02-16 19:08:58
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti rated 94% while driving a Mercedes Benz SL55
Driving on mostly country roads for 9000 spirited miles
My car is modified with about 600bhp and there is not a tyre made that will not break traction with this set up, however , the Vortis are a good bit better than the Continental Contact Sports I have on mother set of wheels and overall I have been stunned by how good they have been.

I read a negativeish review of them on here form another AMG owner, but I would simply say I have got a radically different opinion and I think it is probably a difference of expectations. As I said I can still break traction, but only be being a hooligan with the car.

Wear hasn't been great, but it was never going to be given the car and they have worn no worse than the Contis or the Dunlops before them. Progressiveness is very good indeed and overall I am mighty impressed for the cost. Put it this way another set will be going on when these have finally worn out!
tyre reviewed on 2015-08-11 12:32:14
Michelin Pilot Super Sport rated 92% while driving a BMW 2005 M6
Driving on a combination of roads for 100 spirited miles
Changed into these from Conti's and love them so far. Not had them for long therefore not sure about wear, however grip is phenomenal. Harder compound than the Conti's so ride is abit harder but give alot more confidence in the corners. A must buy for performance cars
tyre reviewed on 2013-02-28 07:55:49
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric rated 70% while driving a Ford Mustang
Driving on a combination of roads for 15000 average miles
No comments left
tyre reviewed on 2012-03-23 08:27:17
Michelin Diamaris rated 56% while driving a BMW X5 3.0d Sport
Driving on a combination of roads for 10000 average miles
No comments left
tyre reviewed on 2011-12-02 01:58:33
Use this tyre size? Why not add your own tyre review and help other owners pick the right tyre