Dry Braking

Looking at data from nine tyre tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during nine dry braking tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 stopped the vehicle in 5.28% less distance than the Vredestein Quatrac.

Best In Dry Braking: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Dry Braking winner was calculated >>

Dry Handling [s]

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during two dry handling [s] tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was 0.15% faster around a lap than the Vredestein Quatrac.

Best In Dry Handling [s]: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>

Dry Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during three dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was 0.22% faster around a lap than the Vredestein Quatrac.

Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>

Subj. Dry Handling

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 and Vredestein Quatrac performed equally well in subj. dry handling tests.

Best In Subj. Dry Handling: Both tyres performed equally well

See how the Subj. Dry Handling winner was calculated >>

Wet Braking

Looking at data from nine tyre tests, the Vredestein Quatrac was better during six wet braking tests. On average the Vredestein Quatrac stopped the vehicle in 2.04% less distance than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Wet Braking: Vredestein Quatrac

See how the Wet Braking winner was calculated >>

Wet Braking - Cool

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Vredestein Quatrac was better during one wet braking - cool tests. On average the Vredestein Quatrac stopped the vehicle in 1.78% less distance than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Wet Braking - Cool: Vredestein Quatrac

See how the Wet Braking - Cool winner was calculated >>

Wet Braking - Concrete

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Vredestein Quatrac was better during one wet braking - concrete tests. On average the Vredestein Quatrac stopped the vehicle in 2.68% less distance than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Wet Braking - Concrete: Vredestein Quatrac

See how the Wet Braking - Concrete winner was calculated >>

Wet Handling [s]

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Vredestein Quatrac was better during two wet handling [s] tests. On average the Vredestein Quatrac was 3.03% faster around a wet lap than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Wet Handling [s]: Vredestein Quatrac

See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>

Wet Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during zero wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was 4.17% faster around a wet lap than the Vredestein Quatrac.

Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Vredestein Quatrac

See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>

Subj. Wet Handling

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during zero subj. wet handling tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 scored 3.16% more points than the Vredestein Quatrac.

Best In Subj. Wet Handling: Vredestein Quatrac

See how the Subj. Wet Handling winner was calculated >>

Wet Circle

Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Vredestein Quatrac was better during three wet circle tests. On average the Vredestein Quatrac was 2.98% faster around a wet circle than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Wet Circle: Vredestein Quatrac

See how the Wet Circle winner was calculated >>

Straight Aqua

Looking at data from six tyre tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during three straight aqua tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 floated at a 1.88% higher speed than the Vredestein Quatrac.

Best In Straight Aqua: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Straight Aqua winner was calculated >>

Curved Aquaplaning

Looking at data from five tyre tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during two curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 slipped out at a 2.87% higher speed than the Vredestein Quatrac.

Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Curved Aquaplaning winner was calculated >>

Snow Braking

Looking at data from six tyre tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during six snow braking tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 stopped the vehicle in 3.22% less distance than the Vredestein Quatrac.

Best In Snow Braking: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Snow Braking winner was calculated >>

Snow Traction

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during two snow traction tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 accelerated 6.61% faster than the Vredestein Quatrac.

Best In Snow Traction: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Snow Traction winner was calculated >>

Snow Traction

Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during four snow traction tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 had 5.32% better snow traction than the Vredestein Quatrac.

Best In Snow Traction: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Snow Traction winner was calculated >>

Snow Handling [s]

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during two snow handling [s] tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was 2.87% faster around a lap than the Vredestein Quatrac.

Best In Snow Handling [s]: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Snow Handling winner was calculated >>

Snow Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during three snow handling [km/h] tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was 2.47% faster around a lap than the Vredestein Quatrac.

Best In Snow Handling [Km/H]: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Snow Handling winner was calculated >>

Subj. Snow Handling

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during one subj. snow handling tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 scored 5% more points than the Vredestein Quatrac.

Best In Subj. Snow Handling: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Subj. Snow Handling winner was calculated >>

Snow Circle

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during one snow circle tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was 1.83% faster around a snow circle than the Vredestein Quatrac.

Best In Snow Circle: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Snow Circle winner was calculated >>

Snow Slalom

Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during three snow slalom tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was 8.68% faster through a slalom than the Vredestein Quatrac.

Best In Snow Slalom: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Snow Slalom winner was calculated >>

Ice Braking

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during one ice braking tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 stopped the vehicle 2.94% shorter than the Vredestein Quatrac.

Best In Ice Braking: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Ice Braking winner was calculated >>

Subj. Comfort

Best In Subj. Comfort: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Subj. Comfort winner was calculated >>

Noise

Looking at data from five tyre tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during three noise tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 measured 0.53% quieter than the Vredestein Quatrac.

Best In Noise: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Noise winner was calculated >>

Tyre Weight

Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Vredestein Quatrac was better during two tyre weight tests. On average the Vredestein Quatrac weighed 1.51% less than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Tyre Weight: Vredestein Quatrac

See how the Tyre Weight winner was calculated >>

Wear

Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during two wear tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 is predicted to cover 7.25% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Vredestein Quatrac.

Best In Wear: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Wear winner was calculated >>

Value

Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Vredestein Quatrac was better during two value tests. On average the Vredestein Quatrac proved to have a 12.04% better value based on price/1000km than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Value: Vredestein Quatrac

See how the Value winner was calculated >>

Price

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Vredestein Quatrac was better during two price tests. On average the Vredestein Quatrac cost 23.41% less than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Price: Vredestein Quatrac

See how the Price winner was calculated >>

Rolling Resistance

Looking at data from five tyre tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during five rolling resistance tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 had a 7.03% lower rolling resistance than the Vredestein Quatrac.

Best In Rolling Resistance: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Rolling Resistance winner was calculated >>

Fuel Consumption

Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during two fuel consumption tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 used 0.93% less fuel than the Vredestein Quatrac.

Best In Fuel Consumption: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Fuel Consumption winner was calculated >>

Abrasion

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during one abrasion tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 emitted 17.82% less particle wear matter than the Vredestein Quatrac.

Best In Abrasion: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Abrasion winner was calculated >>

Abrasion

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during one abrasion tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 lost 21.23% less particle wear matter than the Vredestein Quatrac.

Best In Abrasion: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Abrasion winner was calculated >>