Dry Braking

Looking at data from nine tyre tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during nine dry braking tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 stopped the vehicle in 1.47% less distance than the Kleber Quadraxer 3.

Best In Dry Braking: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Dry Braking winner was calculated >>

Dry Handling [s]

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during two dry handling [s] tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was 1.05% faster around a lap than the Kleber Quadraxer 3.

Best In Dry Handling [s]: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>

Dry Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 was better during zero dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Kleber Quadraxer 3 was 0.76% faster around a lap than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>

Subj. Dry Handling

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 was better during zero subj. dry handling tests. On average the Kleber Quadraxer 3 scored 3.16% more points than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Subj. Dry Handling: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Subj. Dry Handling winner was calculated >>

Wet Braking

Looking at data from nine tyre tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during eight wet braking tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 stopped the vehicle in 2.37% less distance than the Kleber Quadraxer 3.

Best In Wet Braking: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Wet Braking winner was calculated >>

Wet Handling [s]

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during two wet handling [s] tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was 0.75% faster around a wet lap than the Kleber Quadraxer 3.

Best In Wet Handling [s]: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>

Wet Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 was better during zero wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Kleber Quadraxer 3 was 1.63% faster around a wet lap than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>

Subj. Wet Handling

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 was better during zero subj. wet handling tests. On average the Kleber Quadraxer 3 scored 2.17% more points than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Subj. Wet Handling: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Subj. Wet Handling winner was calculated >>

Wet Circle

Looking at data from five tyre tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during three wet circle tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was 0.07% faster around a wet circle than the Kleber Quadraxer 3.

Best In Wet Circle: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Wet Circle winner was calculated >>

Straight Aqua

Looking at data from six tyre tests, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 was better during four straight aqua tests. On average the Kleber Quadraxer 3 floated at a 0.01% higher speed than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Straight Aqua: Kleber Quadraxer 3

See how the Straight Aqua winner was calculated >>

Curved Aquaplaning

Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 was better during three curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Kleber Quadraxer 3 slipped out at a 4.92% higher speed than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Kleber Quadraxer 3

See how the Curved Aquaplaning winner was calculated >>

Snow Braking

Looking at data from six tyre tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during four snow braking tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 stopped the vehicle in 0.38% less distance than the Kleber Quadraxer 3.

Best In Snow Braking: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Snow Braking winner was calculated >>

Snow Traction

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during one snow traction tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 accelerated 2.45% faster than the Kleber Quadraxer 3.

Best In Snow Traction: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Snow Traction winner was calculated >>

Snow Traction

Looking at data from five tyre tests, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 was better during one snow traction tests. On average the Kleber Quadraxer 3 had 2% better snow traction than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Snow Traction: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Snow Traction winner was calculated >>

Snow Handling [s]

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during one snow handling [s] tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was 0.21% faster around a lap than the Kleber Quadraxer 3.

Best In Snow Handling [s]: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Snow Handling winner was calculated >>

Snow Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 was better during zero snow handling [km/h] tests. On average the Kleber Quadraxer 3 was 1.23% faster around a lap than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Snow Handling [Km/H]: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Snow Handling winner was calculated >>

Subj. Snow Handling

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 and Michelin CrossClimate 2 performed equally well in subj. snow handling tests.

Best In Subj. Snow Handling: Both tyres performed equally well

See how the Subj. Snow Handling winner was calculated >>

Snow Slalom

Looking at data from five tyre tests, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 was better during zero snow slalom tests. On average the Kleber Quadraxer 3 was 3.02% faster through a slalom than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Snow Slalom: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Snow Slalom winner was calculated >>

Subj. Comfort

Best In Subj. Comfort: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Subj. Comfort winner was calculated >>

Noise

Looking at data from five tyre tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during four noise tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 measured 0.95% quieter than the Kleber Quadraxer 3.

Best In Noise: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Noise winner was calculated >>

Tyre Weight

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 was better during one tyre weight tests. On average the Kleber Quadraxer 3 weighed 0.07% less than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Tyre Weight: Kleber Quadraxer 3

See how the Tyre Weight winner was calculated >>

Wear

Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 was better during one wear tests. On average the Kleber Quadraxer 3 is predicted to cover 11.03% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Wear: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Wear winner was calculated >>

Value

Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 was better during three value tests. On average the Kleber Quadraxer 3 proved to have a 12.32% better value based on price/1000km than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Value: Kleber Quadraxer 3

See how the Value winner was calculated >>

Price

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 was better during two price tests. On average the Kleber Quadraxer 3 cost 14.9% less than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Price: Kleber Quadraxer 3

See how the Price winner was calculated >>

Rolling Resistance

Looking at data from six tyre tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during five rolling resistance tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 had a 4.97% lower rolling resistance than the Kleber Quadraxer 3.

Best In Rolling Resistance: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Rolling Resistance winner was calculated >>

Fuel Consumption

Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 and Michelin CrossClimate 2 performed equally well in fuel consumption tests.

Best In Fuel Consumption: Both tyres performed equally well

See how the Fuel Consumption winner was calculated >>

Abrasion

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during one abrasion tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 emitted 6.54% less particle wear matter than the Kleber Quadraxer 3.

Best In Abrasion: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Abrasion winner was calculated >>

Abrasion

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during one abrasion tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 lost 3.3% less particle wear matter than the Kleber Quadraxer 3.

Best In Abrasion: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Abrasion winner was calculated >>