Dry Braking

Looking at data from six tyre tests, the Vredestein Ultrac was better during five dry braking tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac stopped the vehicle in 0.87% less distance than the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun.

Best In Dry Braking: Vredestein Ultrac

See how the Dry Braking winner was calculated >>

Dry Handling [s]

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Vredestein Ultrac was better during one dry handling [s] tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac was 0.26% faster around a lap than the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun.

Best In Dry Handling [s]: Vredestein Ultrac

See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>

Dry Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun was better during two dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun was 0.36% faster around a lap than the Vredestein Ultrac.

Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>

Subj. Dry Handling

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun was better during one subj. dry handling tests. On average the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun scored 5.56% more points than the Vredestein Ultrac.

Best In Subj. Dry Handling: Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

See how the Subj. Dry Handling winner was calculated >>

Wet Braking

Looking at data from six tyre tests, the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun was better during four wet braking tests. On average the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun stopped the vehicle in 0.37% less distance than the Vredestein Ultrac.

Best In Wet Braking: Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

See how the Wet Braking winner was calculated >>

Wet Braking - Concrete

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun and Vredestein Ultrac performed equally well in wet braking - concrete tests.

Best In Wet Braking - Concrete: Both tyres performed equally well

See how the Wet Braking - Concrete winner was calculated >>

Wet Handling [s]

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Vredestein Ultrac was better during two wet handling [s] tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac was 1.48% faster around a wet lap than the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun.

Best In Wet Handling [s]: Vredestein Ultrac

See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>

Wet Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun was better during zero wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun was 1.46% faster around a wet lap than the Vredestein Ultrac.

Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Vredestein Ultrac

See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>

Subj. Wet Handling

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun was better during zero subj. wet handling tests. On average the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun scored 5% more points than the Vredestein Ultrac.

Best In Subj. Wet Handling: Vredestein Ultrac

See how the Subj. Wet Handling winner was calculated >>

Wet Circle

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun was better during zero wet circle tests. On average the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun had 6.55% higher lateral wet grip than the Vredestein Ultrac.

Best In Wet Circle: Vredestein Ultrac

See how the Wet Circle winner was calculated >>

Straight Aqua

Looking at data from five tyre tests, the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun was better during one straight aqua tests. On average the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun floated at a 1.36% higher speed than the Vredestein Ultrac.

Best In Straight Aqua: Vredestein Ultrac

See how the Straight Aqua winner was calculated >>

Curved Aquaplaning

Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun was better during one curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun slipped out at a 2.36% higher speed than the Vredestein Ultrac.

Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Vredestein Ultrac

See how the Curved Aquaplaning winner was calculated >>

Subj. Comfort

Best In Subj. Comfort: Vredestein Ultrac

See how the Subj. Comfort winner was calculated >>

Noise

Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun was better during two noise tests. On average the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun measured 0.25% quieter than the Vredestein Ultrac.

Best In Noise: Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

See how the Noise winner was calculated >>

Noise

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun and Vredestein Ultrac performed equally well in noise tests.

Best In Noise: Both tyres performed equally well

See how the Noise winner was calculated >>

Wear

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun was better during two wear tests. On average the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun is predicted to cover 40.92% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Vredestein Ultrac.

Best In Wear: Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

See how the Wear winner was calculated >>

Value

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun was better during one value tests. On average the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun proved to have a 41.29% better value based on price/1000km than the Vredestein Ultrac.

Best In Value: Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

See how the Value winner was calculated >>

Price

Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun was better during two price tests. On average the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun cost 1.55% less than the Vredestein Ultrac.

Best In Price: Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

See how the Price winner was calculated >>

Rolling Resistance

Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun was better during three rolling resistance tests. On average the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun had a 2.2% lower rolling resistance than the Vredestein Ultrac.

Best In Rolling Resistance: Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

See how the Rolling Resistance winner was calculated >>

Fuel Consumption

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Vredestein Ultrac was better during one fuel consumption tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac used 1.67% less fuel than the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun.

Best In Fuel Consumption: Vredestein Ultrac

See how the Fuel Consumption winner was calculated >>

Abrasion

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun was better during one abrasion tests. On average the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun emitted 29.89% less particle wear matter than the Vredestein Ultrac.

Best In Abrasion: Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

See how the Abrasion winner was calculated >>