The new ZE310 tyre is the successor of the ZIEX ZE914 ECORUN, winner of numerous awards from testing organisations. It offers outstanding traction and grip on both wet and dry roads coupled with low wear.
Tyre review data from 101 tyre reviews averaging 81% over 606,214 miles driven, and 25 tests with an average result of 7th.
First On Market | December 2017 |
Wheel Size | 14 - 19" |
Width | 165 - 265mm |
Profile | 35 - 70 |
Rolling Resistance | A - D |
Wet Grip | A - A |
Noise (dB) | 67 - 72 |
Winter Rating | Not Winter Rated |
The ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun is ranked 42nd of 153 Summer Premium Touring tyres.
This tyre replaced the Falken ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun and this tyre has been replaced by the Falken ZIEX ZE320.
In Depth Tyre Comparisons
25
3rd
15th
7th
Summary
The Falken Ziex ZE310 Ecorun, despite being seven years old, showed mixed performance across various tests. Its strengths were in aquaplaning resistance and refinement, performing well in both curved and straight aquaplaning tests and offering good cabin noise reduction and bump absorption. However, the tyre struggled significantly in wet and dry performance tests. It ranked near the bottom in wet braking, cornering, and handling, demonstrating less grip than its competitors. Dry performance was also subpar, with the tyre finishing last in dry braking and sixth in dry handling. Despite its age suggesting it might have good fuel efficiency, the Ecorun surprisingly showed poor rolling resistance. The overall results indicate that while the tyre has some strong points, there is considerable room for improvement in key performance areas.
Results
The Falken Ziex ZE310 Ecorun achieved an overall score of 97.80%, priced at £98.65. It performed well in aquaplaning tests, ranking 3rd in curved aquaplaning (92.70%) and tied for 4th in straight aquaplaning (97.30%). The tyre also tied for 3rd in cabin noise (95.40%). However, it struggled in wet conditions, ranking 7th in wet braking (93.00%), 8th in wet handling (96.20%), and tied for 6th in wet cornering (98.5%). Dry performance was also weak, with 8th in dry braking (94.30%) and tied for 6th in dry handling (98.50%). The tyre ranked 7th in rolling resistance (87.20%), indicating poor fuel efficiency.
.Size | Fuel | Wet | Noise |
---|---|---|---|
14 inch | |||
185/60R14 82 H | C | A | 67 |
15 inch | |||
185/65R15 88 H | D | A | 67 |
195/65R15 91 H | C | A | 67 |
195/65R15 91 V | C | A | 67 |
195/55R15 85 H | C | A | 67 |
16 inch | |||
205/55R16 91 V | C | A | 67 |
205/55R16 94 W XL | C | A | 69 |
205/55R16 94 V XL | C | A | 69 |
215/70R16 100 H | D | A | 67 |
205/60R16 96 W XL | C | A | 69 |
205/60R16 96 V XL | C | A | 69 |
205/60R16 96 V XL | C | A | 69 |
215/60R16 95 V | D | A | 67 |
215/60R16 99 H XL | C | A | 69 |
205/55R16 91 W | D | A | 69 |
205/55R16 91 V | A | A | 71 |
17 inch | |||
215/55R17 94 V | C | A | 67 |
215/55R17 98 W XL | C | A | 69 |
205/50R17 93 V XL | D | A | 69 |
205/50R17 93 W XL | D | A | 69 |
215/45R17 91 W XL | D | A | 69 |
225/45R17 94 W XL | D | A | 69 |
225/45R17 94 W XL | D | A | 69 |
225/60R17 99 V | C | A | 67 |
225/50R17 98 W XL | C | A | 69 |
225/45R17 91 W | D | A | 69 |
225/50R17 98 W XL | D | A | 70 |
18 inch | |||
245/45R18 100 W XL | C | A | 70 |
225/40R18 92 W XL | D | A | 69 |
225/40R18 92 W XL | D | A | 69 |
245/40R18 97 W XL | C | A | 70 |
225/40R18 92 Y XL | D | A | 70 |
255/35R18 90 Y | D | A | 70 |
2018-12-31 - I’m looking to replace a set of bridgestones which came with my Skoda Fabia Monte Carlo from new. It seems to be an awkward tyre size at 215/40/17. I was hoping for all seasons, but there’s only a choice of 2. So I decided on summer tyres. I’ve sort of narrowed it down to the Falken ZIEX ZE310 and the Hankook Ventus Prime 3. Which would you recommend ?
Both are excellent tyres, getting great reviews. The Hankook might have the edge in wear, but overall they're very similar tyres.
2019-08-05 - Is the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun suitable for a SUV 4x4 which is only used on road? My car is a 2014 ford Kuga 2.0 titanium powershift. 235 x 55 R17 tyres
As long as you meet the load index required by your SUV, there's no reason not to use the ZE310.
2019-09-18 - I have a Golf 7 1.4TSi 122BHP with 205/55 X16 German OEM Dunlop Blue Response tyres. These are internally noisy and have very soft sidewalls leading to sloppy handling. I am proposing to chage them to other 205/55 X16V tyres. Falken ZE310, Hankook Prime 3 K125 and Bridgestone T005 have been suggested as possible replacements. The Falkens have a very low external noise performance but I not convinced that this is a reliable guide to the internal noise. I had a very bad expeiuence with German OEM Dunlop tyres on a new BMW 316i in the past and I wonder if the Blue Response tyres are of the same ilk? i.e. poor OEM tyres. Internal noise & wet grip are the most important parameters for the replacements and I am willing to trade off ride comfort with slightly stiffer sidewalls. Any comments you have would be much appreciated. Many thanks for the most helpful web site.
Unfortunately all modern tyres have soft sidewalls as it reduces rolling resistance. You are correct in thinking there isn't necessarily a correlation between external and internal noise, but there is often a link. I have no personal experience with the ZE310 but I have seen tests note it's a good handling tyre for its class, so maybe worth a try! One thing worth remembering is that stiffer sidewalls will transmit more vibration through to the chassis increasing internal noise.
2020-09-17 - I have a VW Passat 59 plate and need new tyres. Should I go for the Falken Ziex ZE310 Ecorun or the Falken Azenis FK510? Both look like good mid range tyres and recommended by your website.
If your priority is comfort, the ZE310, if it's sporty driving, the FK510 is the correct tyre.
2020-11-07 - The group test of the 205/55 X 16 tyres was really good. I have a Golf 7 1.4 with this size of tyre and am contemplating a change to Falken. VW fitted 205/55 X16 91H tyres to this car in late 2014. Could you please tell me why 94V Falken ZIEX ZE310 tyres were used in the test? Did Falken recommend them or were they the only ones available in this size? The 94V version is available locally at a very good price. Thanks BJ
This was the recommended size by Falken, but the 91H version has done well in other tests too.
2022-10-23 - Are these a good bet for a Lexus NX300h in 225/60/18?
If you can find the correct size and load rating I'm sure they'd be a very good match.
2022-12-29 - I’m looking for a the most sporty tyre in the not very popular 205/50r15 size, so that means no Michelin/Continental/Goodyear or even Maxxis Primetra. I’ve narrowed it down to the Falken ZE310 Ecorun and the Hankook Ventus V12 Evo2. I’m not worried about noise or comfort, just subjective handling. Which would you plump for?
I've not tried the Hankook but I would never recommend the ZE310 for a sporty feel.
2024-06-07 - What can you tell us, if anything, about the replacement for this? The upcoming ZE320. Cheers!
As of yet there is no official information about the ZE320, and it's not yet appearing in the EPREL database.
Size | Price Range | |
---|---|---|
195/45 R16 | £83.95 - £109.99 (3 Prices) | Compare Prices >> |
195/55 R16 | £102.46 - £102.46 (1 Prices) | Compare Prices >> |
205/40 R17 | £89.35 - £105.99 (3 Prices) | Compare Prices >> |
205/45 R17 | £98.86 - £112.36 (2 Prices) | Compare Prices >> |
205/55 R16 | £90.76 - £90.76 (1 Prices) | Compare Prices >> |
225/45 R17 | £91.10 - £95.99 (2 Prices) | Compare Prices >> |
Available in 73 tyre sizes - View all. |
Have YOU got experience with the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun? Help millions of other tyre buyers