Have YOU got experience with the Nokian Hakka Blue SUV? Help millions of other tyre buyers

Review your Nokian Hakka Blue SUV >

Really bad and expensive. I guess Nokian is better with winter tyres than with summer ones..

Was very pleased by performance of Hakka Z on my wife's 04 RAV4, especially in wet conditions. So bought Hakka Blue for my 09 Pajero Sport.
The first impression - noisy, but well handled on dry plain surface.
The second - awful riding comfort on bumpy roads, every hole respond by massive impact on front shocks. Tyres were stone bows absorbing every gravel and shooting at the whole horizon.
The third - superb wet grip, hadling and braking, especially for 4x4 2ton SUV. All blemishes washed away by first rain.
One more - awful riding comfort was eliminated by front shocks replacement. And don't forget - this tyre has aramid reinforced sidewall which protects your budget unlike yokohamas.
Third year of driving - mark '6' is visible on wear indicator.
Truly road tyre for rainy days.

Bought these tyres when displeased with OE fitted Goodyear Efficient grip. The Goodyears (not marked for SUV use) seemed to have soft and easily damaged sidewalls. Sidewall bulging occured without having kurbed the tyre. Very pleased with Hakka Blue. Very quiet ride. Can hear slight rumble noise during very low speed tight turns, probably due to sharpish edges on the outer treadpattern. I expect the claimed strong 'aramid' construction will give this tyre the necessary strength to keep my SUV and family safe. Let you know later if anything unusual shows up with this tyre. They are now, October 9th, hanging on the garage wall for the winter season although I expect they could have stayed on the car until the first snowfall.